The total irreversable inability of fallen nature

[The Biblicist]

God is literally speaking about the war He placed between fallen man and Satan right then and there.

Funny! Neither Christ or Paul agree with your interpetation as they teach Satan is the FATHER of the lost and they strive to be like him, and the lost are his WILLING SERVANTS and that the Lost LOVE the world which is Satan's system.

 

[The Biblicist]

Again, you seem unable to understand that scripture cannot contradict itself.

When you interpret each text by the facts of the immediate context it does not contradict itself. YOU JUST NEVER DO THAT! Instead you CONSISTENTLY JUMP FROM TEXT TO TEXT whenever you are challenged by the immediate contextual facts of any given text.

For example, my exposition of Romans 8:7-8 cannot be proven wrong as the langauge demands it. If you could prove it wrong BY THE FACTS OF THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT you would but you can't and so you RUN.

 

[Winman]

When you interpret each text by the facts of the immediate context it does not contradict itself. YOU JUST NEVER DO THAT! Instead you CONSISTENTLY JUMP FROM TEXT TO TEXT whenever you are challenged by the immediate contextual facts of any given text.

For example, my exposition of Romans 8:7-8 cannot be proven wrong as the langauge demands it. If you could prove it wrong BY THE FACTS OF THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT you would but you can't and so you RUN.

You are funny.

How can one verse contradict itself? :laugh:

 

[quantumfaith]

There is quite a difference in egotism and just plain factual truth. I stated the plain factual truth and those who do not like it respond as you do with egotistical jabs, distractions, JRP's, personal insults, etc.

It was not a jab, it was as you said, the plain factual truth. I understand how difficult it is to "own up" to things about ourselves that are unattractive, one of the qualities of being human we all share.

 

[Iconoclast]

When you interpret each text by the facts of the immediate context it does not contradict itself. YOU JUST NEVER DO THAT! Instead you CONSISTENTLY JUMP FROM TEXT TO TEXT whenever you are challenged by the immediate contextual facts of any given text.

For example, my exposition of Romans 8:7-8 cannot be proven wrong as the langauge demands it. If you could prove it wrong BY THE FACTS OF THE IMMEDIATE CONTEXT you would but you can't and so you RUN.

yes...this is a pattern in each thread...the run faster than Usain Bolt.:thumbsup:

 

[Skandelon]

yes...this is a pattern in each thread...the run faster than Usain Bolt.:thumbsup:

Yeah, you got us pegged. Is this how we all look to you because we are so scared?

Killer Rabbits!!! RUN!!! :laugh:

 

[quantumfaith]

yes...this is a pattern in each thread...the run faster than Usain Bolt.:thumbsup:

Who is Usain Bolt?