As a committed fundamentalist, all I can say is that I am glad you are an "ex-Fundy" because I don't want anything to do with people that have an attitude like yours.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I got one thing to say to you there buddy.
Go Jump in the lake!
Originally Posted by paidagogos
At the risk of sounding sharp, your tone and attitude is reminiscent of the worst spirits and attitudes found in Fundamentalism. Although you may have publicly repudiated the movement, you have retained the language and spirit of the very thing that you decry. You are blinded by your own bitterness and malice. One cannot judge a whole movement by its deviants as you have done. Remember that one of the twelve was a thief and traitor.
Let judgment begin at home before judging others of whom you cannot know their hearts and minds. Enough sin to be purged lies in our own hearts and lives before we begin castigating a whole group full of good, godly people who love God, do good and live righteously. Recant and repent. [emphasis added] :tear:
Ex-Fundy said:I got one thing to say to you there buddy.
Ex-Fundy said:Go Jump in the lake!
Ex-Fundy said:I got one thing to say to you there buddy.
Go Jump in the lake!
Ex-Fundy said:I got one thing to say to you there buddy.
Go Jump in the lake!
IFB Mole said:
2.) For some, fundamentalism has morphed into the "law of fundamentalism". In other words like the Jews with the Mosaic Law, these fundamentalists use the do's and don'ts as a barometer of their spirituality. (ie. vocal KJVO, no pants on woman, no shorts on men, short hair on men that has a part and is combed, make sure you go to every service dressed with a tie for men and long dresses on woman, no movies, make sure kids are home schooled or Christian school only, no southern gospel or CCM, husbands and wives can NEVER dance, you must get involved in some ministry, go soul-winning, DO NOT read any theology books, hit the alter now and then, extra points for no TV, No internet and mom stays at home and must wear dresses all the time that are from a 1960's Sears catalog, girls mustn't play sports or go swimming, yada, yada)
labaptist said:My church isn't against girls swimming, they are just against mixed swimming. Any red blooded male who sees a girl in a bathing suit (well maybe not those Muslim ones someone linked, but most normal ones) is going to think thoughts that he should only think about with his wife.
gb93433 said:When I was in college during one summer I worked at a Christian camp in the mountains and it was quite interesting to see what happened when the fundamentalist groups rented the camp. On the days girls swam, the boys were around the outside of the fence looking at the girls and on the days boys swam, the girls were around the outside of the fence looking at the boys. I never saw one exception during the entire summer by any of those groups. So much for teaching kids about swimming. The stood aginst mixed swimming but not against looking the entire time. There was not even a concrete area outide of the fence. The conrete deck around the pool was raised about 2 feet. Anyone who came by or worked there noticed. The first time I saw that I was surprised and I got quite an education about those groups.
av1611jim said:You can put a barbed wire fence around the pasture to keep the cows in but some of them will still cut themselves straining at the fence to get at the grass on the other side.
gb93433 said:That is because people are reading less and less books.
The great thing is how many archaeological discoveries have come about in the past 30 years or so which give credibility to the Bible. I think we are living in great times when we have so many reasons for our faith based on actual tangible evidence.
Baptist in Richmond said:Do you have any links to give us on this? I would really enjoy reading these.
PASTOR MHG said:I will state proudly that I am a "Fundamentalist" in the historic since of the word. That said, I will also state that i am recovering from the "UFO" movement. I have seen it from both sides and have been enlightened by the Word of God as I began to really study it and not just take another man's word for what it said.
That being said however, I see "Fundamentalism" in the same light as I see my religious rights as an American. Let me explain... As an American I have the freedom to worship God as I choose. At the same time, so does a Muslim, a Hindu, a Mormon, even a Satanist. I completely disagree wholeheartedly with each of these religions... I even actively oppose them. However, I would stand shoulder to shoulder with any and all adherents to these religions and fight for their right to believe and practice that religion if they so desire. Why would I do this? Because as a "fundamentalist" I believe in the "freedom of thought and religion" that stems from my fundamentalist beliefs of "the priesthood of the individual believer" and "the individual soul liberty of every person."
That said, I would think that on those to principles should lie our conviction that we would fight for the right of even the "UFO's" to practice as they please. They may be wrong, but they have that right. And because of my "fundamental beliefs" I will fight for them to maintain that right.
Just my perspective.
Max
Actually, these are historically Baptist positions rather than Fundamentalist positions. The average Fundamentalist would historically agree with these positions, but they did not grow out of the Fundamentalist movement. They were part of Baptist belief hundreds of years ago. :type:PASTOR MHG said:Because as a "fundamentalist" I believe in the "freedom of thought and religion" that stems from my fundamentalist beliefs of "the priesthood of the individual believer" and "the individual soul liberty of every person."
John of Japan said:Actually, these are historically Baptist positions rather than Fundamentalist positions. The average Fundamentalist would historically agree with these positions, but they did not grow out of the Fundamentalist movement. They were part of Baptist belief hundreds of years ago. :type:
That's admirable, but Fundamentalism does not stem from an urge towards freedom of thought. It stems from a desire to stand up for what is right and rebuke wrong thought. In particular, Fundamentalism historically arose from the desire to evict liberalism from major denominations such as the SBC, the ABC, PCUSA (Presbyterian), ETC. So while I agree completely with you on freedom of thought, I don't believe it is a core belief of Fundamentalism.PASTOR MHG said:Amen JoJ! That I completely agree with. That is why I said that my position as a "fundamentalist" STEMS FROM those two positions.
My "fundamentalism" is the logical conclusion of adhereing to these positions.
Max