The Ultimate Con

[NiteShift]

Al Qaeda tried to blow up the World Trade Center before. I wouldn't be surprised if al Qaeda used explosives and also used the airliners for the visual effect it would have.

Well, the only problem with that is that the seismographic record doesn't support it. But at least it is within the realm of possibility.

 

[carpro]

Al Qaeda tried to blow up the World Trade Center before. I wouldn't be surprised if al Qaeda used explosives and also used the airliners for the visual effect it would have.

I wouldn't be surprised , either. But there is no solid indication that they did so. No proof.

I know. All proof was destroyed in the collapse. But we found out who the hijackers were and I'm sure that, somewhere in all the myriad investigations, we would have discovered evidence of other involvement , if there had been any.

Next, I guess we accuse our government of finding such evidence, but suppressing it. There seems to be no end. But again, no proof.

Round and round we go.:BangHead:

 

[Rufus_1611]

I wouldn't be surprised , either. But there is no solid indication that they did so. No proof.

I know. All proof was destroyed in the collapse. But we found out who the hijackers were and I'm sure that, somewhere in all the myriad investigations, we would have discovered evidence of other involvement , if there had been any.

Next, I guess we accuse our government of finding such evidence, but suppressing it. There seems to be no end. But again, no proof.

Round and round we go.:BangHead:

Who do you believe the hijackers were and what is your proof?

 

[James_Newman]

I wouldn't be surprised , either. But there is no solid indication that they did so. No proof.

I know. All proof was destroyed in the collapse. But we found out who the hijackers were and I'm sure that, somewhere in all the myriad investigations, we would have discovered evidence of other involvement , if there had been any.

Next, I guess we accuse our government of finding such evidence, but suppressing it. There seems to be no end. But again, no proof.

Round and round we go.:BangHead:

No, all proof was destroyed in the 'clean-up' which any other day would have been called 'tampering with a crime scene'.

 

[poncho]

Al Qaeda tried to blow up the World Trade Center before. I wouldn't be surprised if al Qaeda used explosives and also used the airliners for the visual effect it would have.

Al Qeada? How was "Al Qeada" (CIA, ISI creation) supposed to gain entry to a building complex being guarded by Marvin Pierce Bush and Securacom long enough to plant the massive amounts of explosives and steel cutting thermate charges that would be needed to cause 110,000 supports to fail at the same time? I can see it now...half a dozen drunken and promiscuous but otherwise devout muslims (like the alleged hijackers) carrying boxes of the stuff past Bush's security guards, making openings in the walls on every floor in plain view of everyone fixing packages to the steel supports for weeks on end. Not very likely Ken.

More likely the stuff was planted by intelligence (demo experts) people acting as construction workers or whatever during the "power downs" the WTC buildings underwent just prior to 9/11.

The reason "Al Qeada" (CIA, ISI creation) was able to get explosives in the WTC basement in 1993 was that the FBI was holding the door open for them Ken. Looks like you got some catching up to do amigo. Take a gander at this archive of mainstream news articles. Nevermind the folks that'll start screaming and whining (and making their little jokes) that these articles from the mainstream media are no longer credible because they just happen to be archived on a "conspiracy site". The fact is all this stuff did come out in the mainstream corporate media the same MSCM in fact that the people who always do all the screaming whining and joking trust sooooo much for their daily half hour of news and information. So let em scream their lungs out. Or do alittle reading of their own. :smilewinkgrin:

No, all proof was destroyed in the 'clean-up' which any other day would have been called 'tampering with a crime scene'.

Being a prosecutor himself, I find it hard to believe that Rudy didn't know he was commiting a crime ordering the destruction of evidence. Destruction of evidence is a crime in New York is it not?

 

[carpro]

Al Qeada? How was "Al Qeada" (CIA, ISI creation) supposed to gain entry to a building complex being guarded by Marvin Pierce Bush and Securacom long enough to plant the massive amounts of explosives and steel cutting thermate charges that would be needed to cause 110,000 supports to fail at the same time?

Oh, but they weren't!

Only the President's men could do that.

 

[poncho]

Oh, but they weren't!

Only the President's men could do that.

I doubt that very much Carpro, but to think of this president as the "mastermind" of anything but the regular and long vactions at the ranch is rather humorous isn't it?

 

[carpro]

I doubt that very much Carpro, but to think of this president as the "mastermind" of anything but the regular and long vactions at the ranch is rather humorous isn't it?

Really?

I believe your implication was clear, so I treated it with all the respect it was due.

 

[poncho]

Really?

I believe your implication was clear, so I treated it with all the respect it was due.

I believe I've made my implication clear also. Many times here on BB and that is George W. Bush and his administration is now and always has been strictly middle management. There are higher powers in this world than presidents. A few of them have even said so themselves.

 

[carpro]

I believe I've made my implication clear also. Many times here on BB and that is George W. Bush and his administration is now and always has been strictly middle management. There are higher powers in this world than presidents. A few of them have even said so themselves.

OK. Don't be bashful, now.

Name the top level "management".

Maybe I'll recognize their names.

 

[poncho]

OK. Don't be bashful, now.

Name the top level "management".

Maybe I'll recognize their names.

Again? C'mon man start readin my posts. I've named em ten thousand times here already where have you been all this time? Hint, it's the same people that Ron Paul is making very nervous these days and I ain't talkin about no democrats or republicans.

P.S. If Carpro doesn't catch on soon could someone please explain to him what an oligarchy is and how it works? Apparently I am unable to get the idea across.

 

[KenH]

Is this the neverending thread? :laugh:

 

[poncho]

Is this the neverending thread? :laugh:

I was thinking the mods must have taken a mid summer siesta six pages ago. Hope they're okay.

 

[Ed Edwards]

The first principle of taking over the World Conspiracy Theories:

They who know, speak not
They who know not, speak.

There are no other principles.

The first and only principle of taking over the
World Conspiracy Theories:

They who know, speak not
They who know not, speak.

 

[poncho]

The first principle of taking over the World Conspiracy Theories:

They who know, speak not
They who know not, speak.

There are no other principles.

The first and only principle of taking over the
World Conspiracy Theories:

They who know, speak not
They who know not, speak.

Yeah okay Ed, a bunch of past presidents are conspiracy theorists then too. Eisenhower was a conspiracy theorist, Smedly Butler was a conspiracy theorist, George Washington was a conspiracy theorist, why for goodness sakes even Thomas Jefferson was conspiracy theorist. Even Richard Nixon was a conspiracy theorist and come to think of it so was Billy Grahm when he was talking to Nixon.

Yer old cliche has been debunked enough already dude. :smilewinkgrin:

 

[Ed Edwards]

Ed belabors the obvious :laugh: : Poncho speaks a lot :type:

 

[poncho]

Ed belabors the obvious :laugh: : Poncho speaks a lot :type:

Well, there ya have it folks. Ed wins the debate by not debating.

And bidi bidi bidi that's all folks! :laugh:

 

[Ed Edwards]

... And bidi bidi bidi that's all folks! :laugh:

Ed searches the smilie sites for a smilie that
doesn't open it's mouth

 

[carpro]

Again? C'mon man start readin my posts. I've named em ten thousand times here already where have you been all this time? Hint, it's the same people that Ron Paul is making very nervous these days and I ain't talkin about no democrats or republicans.

Name them one more time. No mystery. No qualifying comments. Just the names.

I'm beginning to think all your talk is just empty rhetoric.

 

[carpro]

Again? C'mon man start readin my posts. I've named em ten thousand times here already where have you been all this time? Hint, it's the same people that Ron Paul is making very nervous these days and I ain't talkin about no democrats or republicans.

Duck, dodge, weave. It's a long thread, but you have not named your upper "management" in it.

Let's have the names.