Wrong.
God the Son is not Biblical. It is explicitly of two errors: Tritheism and Modalism.
John 1:1-2, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God.
Note, with God is being someone other than God. And was God is being God.
The Word is identified as the Son, John 1:18, Proverbs 30:4, John 14:6; 1 Timothy 2:5.
The Word, who is the Son of God is both someone other than God with God and was God too.
Not Tritheism. Not Modalism.
I agree with you that God the Son is not of the word of God. That being said I ask;
Relative to John 1:1-2 Is the Word that was with God and the Word that is God, the Word that was made flesh, in reality, the mind thoughts and intent of the Living God rather than some concept of, "person"? In other words, the thoughts and intent of God, the Word, came in the flesh as a person the Son of the Living God, the Christ?
I will be who i will be, came in the flesh as, I Am! ----- Emmanuel
Does the Word of God actually say something other than that? If so, what?
Is what the following heard, what became flesh?
And
the LORD spake unto you out of the midst of the fire: ye heard
the voice of the words, but saw no similitude; only
ye heard a voice. Duet 4:12
For who
is there of all flesh, that hath
heard the voice of the living God speaking out of the midst of the fire, as we
have, and lived? Duet 5:26
Heb 1:1,2 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by
his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
Is the Word made flesh, what God speaks to us, in Person of Son?