• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Thoughts on Biblical Inspiration

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
Biblical Inspiration as defined, means:

“The Supernatural action of the Holy Spirit on the mind of the sacred writers whereby the Scriptures were not merely their own but the word of God. Scripture not merely contains but is the Word of God.”

2 Peter 1:20-21 and 2 Timothy 3:15-17 are two important passages that deal with Biblical Inspiration.

“Above all else, however, remember that none of us can explain by ourselves a prophecy in the Scriptures. For no prophetic message ever came just from the human will, but people were under the control of the Holy Spirit as they spoke the message that came from God” (GNB)

“And that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (NKJV)

I believe the Inspiration of the Holy Bible is Dictational. This is from the website, GotQuestions, which defines it well.

“The dictation theory states that God “dictated” His Word to the writers of Scripture, who were nothing more than human stenographers for the Holy Spirit. The dictation theory says that the Spirit wrote through the agency of human writers who were fully under God’s control. With the authors in a state of relative passivity, God dictated every word written with pinpoint accuracy. In this way, human personality and human error could not interfere with God’s intended message. The human writers did not personally contribute anything to the content of Scripture since they were passive instruments of God’s will”

This is what the Apostle Peter says in the passage that I have quoted above. The words “under the control”, or as other translations have it, “moved”, etc, come from the Greek, “φερόμενοι”, which is a present passive participle, which is from the verb φέρω. A good example of this verb in the passive voice, can be found in Acts 27:15 and 17, “And when the ship was caught and could not face the wind, we gave way to it and were driven along (ἐφερόμεθα)… After hoisting it up, they used supports to undergird the ship. Then, fearing that they would run aground on the Syrtis, they lowered the gear, and thus they were driven along (ἐφέροντο)” In both cases the ship was “driven” by the wind. Likewise, the Writers of the Books of the Holy Bible, were “passive” in what they wrote, as they were “dictated” to by the Holy Spirit. Because the Words that they wrote, “came from God” (ἀπὸ θεοῦ)., with God being the “source” of what they wrote. John Trapp, in his commentary on 2 Peter 1:21, says, “As they were moved] φερομενοι. Forcibly moved, acted, carried out of themselves to say and do what God would have them”

We accept that the Writers of the Original Autograps, were directly Inspired by God the Holy Spirit, and wrote down they very Words that they were told to. So that the Holy Bible is only The Word of God, and not a mixture of, The Word of God, and the word of humans.

This Inspiration means, that when we read in the Holy Bible, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”, as in Genesis 1:1, we accept this is “The Word of God”, that they are also “Inerrant”, which is, “free from any error”, and because of this, they are “Infallible”, that is, they are “completely trustworthy and dependable”. The Words of the Holy Bible as in the Original Autograps, are The Inspired Word of God, “once for all time”, which makes the Holy Bible Unique, without any equal or comparison.

I would like to propose the “theory” of “continued Inspiration”. By which I do not mean that any of the ttranslations of the Original Autographs, like the King James Version, etc, are “Inspired” by God, as the Originals are “God-breathed”, which is impossible, as this phenomenon, is unrepeatable, and only applies to the Original Autographs. However, the very Words of the Holy Bible, that were written in the Original Autographs, like Genesis 1:1, are the same in the King James Version, which is a translation made by men, without the same “Inspiration” given to the Writers of the Original Autographs, as they are in the the originals. If the translations that are faithfully made from faithful manuscripts of the Original Autographs, do have “The Word of God”, and are Infallible and Inerrant. Then, even though these “translations” are not in themselves “Inspired” by God the Holy Spirit, are nonetheless products of the Original Autographs, which were so Inspired. Is it possible, that since these “translations” and “manuscripts”, are indeed very faithful in reproducing the Original Autographs, that the “Inspiration” that is in these Original Autographs, in some way “continues”, or “transfers” to these “copies”? Though we may used a “Version” of the Holy Bible, like the King James, yet we accept this as “The Word of God”, and build our theology on it. We read verses like John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”, and we can say with confidence, that this verse teaches, that Jesus Christ existed from all eternity, with the Father, Who is a distinct Person from “The Word”, and is “God”. And that “The Word”, is also in this verse said to be “God”, equally to the Father. We believe and accept this, because it says so in our Bible, even though this Bible is a “translation”, made by human beings. But, it is a very faithful translation, unlike, for example, the New World Translation, made by the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which cannot be considered a “faithful” translation, because of its deliberate changes, in places, to suit their theological bias.

This confidence that we have when we read and teach from the Holy Bible, is based on the fact that they are very faithful “translations” made from very faithful “copies” of the manuscripts of the Original Hebrew and Greek Books of the Holy Bible. If these “translations” are very faithful in what they have produced, as being true to the Original Autographs, which were “God-breathed”, then, I believe this this “Inspiration” is “preserved” in these faithful “copies”, by God the Holy Spirit. And we can say with the greatest of confidence, when we read our Bible, that we are indeed reading the Word of God!

Just some thoughts. I would like to hear what others think of this?
 
Last edited:

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Scriptures are the specific revealed, written words of God given by the miracle of inspiration to the prophets and apostles. According to the Scriptures, God revealed His Word to the prophets and apostles by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 3:5, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Rom. 15:4, 1 Cor. 2:10-13, Rom. 16:25-26, Heb. 1:1-2, Acts 1:2, Eph. 2:20, Acts 3:21, John 16:13, John 17:8, 14, John 3:34, 2 Sam. 23:2, Luke 24:25, 27, 44). The word of the LORD came to the prophets and apostles (1 Sam. 15:10, 2 Kings 20:4, Isa. 38:4, Jer. 1:4, Jer. 29:30, Ezek. 6:1, Dan. 9:2, Jonah 1:1, Zech. 7:8, Acts 3:21). A true prophet spoke from the mouth of the LORD (2 Chron. 36:12, Luke 1:70, Jer. 1:9, Acts 3:21, 2 Sam. 23:2, Deut. 18:22). The actual specific words that proceeded out of the mouth of God or that God breathed out are those original language words given by inspiration to the prophets and apostles (Matt. 4:4, Deut. 8:3, Luke 4:4, Isa. 55:11). God’s Word is “the Scriptures of the prophets” (Rom. 16:26, Matt. 26:56). God gave His words or spoke by the mouth of the prophets (Luke 1:70, Jer. 1:9, Acts 1:16, Acts 3:21, Ps. 68:11, 2 Chron. 36:12). All Scripture was given by inspiration of God to those prophets and apostles (2 Tim. 3:16, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Eph. 3:5, Eph. 2:20, Jude 1:3). While 2 Timothy 3:16 may not directly mention the prophets and apostles, the parallel verse concerning inspiration (2 Pet. 1:21) clearly connected the miracle of inspiration to them when considered with other related verses in the whole of Scripture. Comparing scripture with scripture, the holy men of God moved or borne along by the Holy Spirit in the miracle of inspiration were clearly the prophets and apostles (2 Pet. 1:21, Eph. 3:5, Eph. 2:20, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Rom. 16:26, Luke 1:70, Matt. 26:56). The exact same words that the psalmist wrote in Psalm 95 the Holy Spirit spoke or said (compare Ps. 95:7 with Hebrews 3:7). What Moses said to Pharaoh as the LORD told him (Exod. 9:13), the Scripture said (Rom. 9:17, Exod. 9:16). The whole counsel of God or the overall teaching of the Scriptures would indicate that there can be no new inspired works without living apostles or prophets (2 Peter 1:21, Eph. 3:3-5, Heb. 1:1-2, Luke 1:70, 24:27, 44-45, Acts 1:16, 3:21, 26:27, Matt. 2:5, Rom. 1:2, Rom. 16:25-26, Jer. 29:19, 2 Chron. 36:12, Dan. 9:10, Amos 3:7).
 

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
The whole counsel of God or the overall teaching of the Scriptures would indicate that there can be no new inspired works without living apostles or prophets

Thanks very much for your important contribution.

I am not saying that any translations of the Bible are "Inspired" afresh by the Holy Spirit, as the Original Autographs were. What I am saying is, that since the Original Autographs are "God-breathed", and those Bible versions that we do have, like the KJV, NASB, ESV, that are very faithful to the Original Autographs, that this Original "Inspiration" has continued intro these translations, because when we refer to the Holy Bible, we say that it IS The Word of God. I would take the words in Hebrews 4:12, "For the Word of God is Living, and Active, and Sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing even to the dividing of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and quick to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart", as referring to the entire 66 Books of the Bible. The Greek "ζῶν" (Living), is the Present, Active, Participle. The "present" tense of the verb is used to show a "continuance". The Bible in the Original Autographs, were "The Living Word of God", and this is no less true today, even in the Versions that we use today.
 

SavedByGrace

Well-Known Member
“This question is best answered by Scripture itself. It defines its own terms. Let us turn, then, "to the Law and to the Testimony In 2 Tim. 3 :16 "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God."The word "inspired" means literally "God-breathed." It is composed of two Greek words theos =God; and pnein = to breathe. The term "given by inspiration" signifies, then, that the writings of the Old Testament, of which Paul is here speaking, are the result of a certain influence exerted by God upon their authors. The meaning of the word "breathed," as here used, is brought out very forcibly by the comparison of two other words translated in the same way. The one is the Greek word psuchein =to breathe gently, while in 1 Tim. 3 :16 the term denotes a forcible respiration. The other is the Hebrew word ah-ayrh =to breathe unconsciously, while 2 Tim. 3 :16 denotes a conscious breathing. Inspiration, then, as defined by Paul in this passage, is the strong, conscious inbreathing of God into men, qualifying them to give utterance to truth. It is God speaking through men, and the Old Testament is therefore just as much the Word of God as though Ood spake every single word of it with His own lips. The Scriptures are the result of divine inbreathing, just as human speech is uttered by the breathing through a man's mouth. 2 Pet. 1 :21 "For not by the will of man was prophecy brought at any time, but being borne by the Holy Spirit, the holy men of God spoke." (This is a literal rendering, and brings out the sense more clearly.) The participle "moved" may be translated “when moved," so this passage teaches that holy men of God wrote the Scripture when moved to do so by the Holy Spirit Further, the participle is passive, and denotes "to be moved upon” This distinctly teaches that the Scripture was not written by mere men, or at their suggestion, but by men moved upon, prompted, yea indeed, driven by the promptings of the Holy Spirit This declaration of Peter may be said to intimate that the Holy Ghost was especially and miraculously present with and in the writers of the Scriptures, revealing to them truths which they did not know before, and guiding them alike in their record of these truths, and of the transactions of which they were eye and ear witnesses, so that they were enabled to present them with substantial accuracy to the minds of others.” (William Evans, The Great Doctrines of The Bible, pp. 194-195)
 
I believe as I think you do that every word is placed in Scripture exactly as God intended, perfect and infallible in the original. I think God is omniscous enough to be able to allow for each writer’s personality and still perfectly express exactly what He intended (the ship is still a ship with its marine engineering characteristics even when driven by the wind). Examples for that to me would be the differences between First and Second Peter which are most likely explained by two different amanuenses. Also, Paul’s genius as well as his personality and style to me is evident in fascinating ways, especially with the first two chapters of Romans. Amos and Psalms (David’s) might be another example of personality seen but never diminishing or interrupting God’s perfect expressions of what is in His mind or on His lips. David’s use of chiasms and the Bible with hundreds of chiasms that the Holy Spirit directed, how can they not be wonderful grist for meditating on biblical truth? I don’t think God is limited by the personalities of the writers nor is He hindered or limited by allowing the writer’s personalities and styles to be evident.

As far as copies, even with mistakes or errors in copying/translations, most are “undone” by other passages or context found either near the errant translation or in the verse itself. I think it’s wonderful that the power of God’s Word is still efficacious for any believer seeking a relationship with God who studies and desires to know Him, regardless of language as long as, like you said, the translators are not filled with their own screwed up agendas.

That He went through so much trouble to preserve His truth so that each “I” who is interested in knowing Him, His standards, His provisions, His requirements, His attributes, His benefits can easily do so with the power of the Holy Spirit, never ceases to amaze and I am so grateful that He did it.
 
Top