• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Titles

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
I agree. Jesus said not to address an other Christian by an elevated title; that would include: pastor, father, reverend, deacon, teacher, apostle, bishop, etc.
We are all brothers.

Reference please
 
I believe the passage referred to here is Matthew 23:1-12. I used to volunteer at a hospital with a 7th Day Adventist Pastor and he used this passage to explain why his church did not allow titles including Reverend or Deacon.

Matt.23

[1] Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples,
[2] Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
[3] All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
[4] For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
[5] But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
[6] And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
[7] And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
[8] But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
[9] And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
[10] Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
[11] But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
[12] And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.

I always wondered how Catholic Priests justify the use of the title Father when they read this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

padredurand

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I always wondered how Catholic Priests justify the use of the title Father when they read this.

I always wonder how Paul justified claiming to be the father of the Christians at Corinth.

1 Corinthians 4:15-16 NAS77
15 For if you were to have countless tutors in Christ, yet you would not have many fathers; for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel.
16 I exhort you therefore, be imitators of me.
 

Zenas

Active Member
I always wondered how Catholic Priests justify the use of the title Father when they read this.
Jesus was using hyperbole when he said to call no man father. He of course meant not to give any man the honor that is due only to God. Here are other examples of hyperbole that we can't (and don't) take literally:

[W]hen you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, when you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, Matthew 6:3.

If your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 If your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to go into hell. Matthew 5:29-30.

But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you. Matthew 6:6.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is a challenging argument to make in light of Scripture.

Though our titles have changed, indeed, evolved, since the first century. However, in that context titles were used.

Jesus is called "Rabbi" or "Rabbioni" numerous times in the first four books. The Apostles clearly were given a title, and elders or pastors were also, as well one can see the emerging title of "Deacon" "Prophet" and "Presbyter" emerge as legitimate titles by the end of the first century.

Maybe sometimes we baptists just try to be too baptist. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Perhaps the key word in the Drfuss quote is "elevated."

Pastor, deacon, bishop were all titles of office indicating service with special responsibility. However, such titles were not "elevating" a person over another as more special in access to the Father.

Such came later along with confessionals, praying to saints, and relics.

I do think (if in fact I am right in my discernment of what was stated) that Drfuss has a good point to make.
 

Gregory Perry Sr.

Active Member
What I think....

I will call my pastor Pastor, preacher, brother, my friend, and at times when in private I may even call him by his first name....but I will NOT call him or any other preacher "Reverend" or even "Rev." The only place that word appears in scripture is in Psalm 111:9 and it is a term used to describe how holy, special and worthy of reverence, fear and respect God's name is. No mere mortal man is deserving of this term and it was never intended to be used as a "title" anyway. I also have the same objection to the use of the term "Father" as applied to the so-called "priests" of the RCC in complete disregard of what the Word of God teaches in Matt. 23.

Bro.Greg:saint:
 

saturneptune

New Member
I will call my pastor Pastor, preacher, brother, my friend, and at times when in private I may even call him by his first name....but I will NOT call him or any other preacher "Reverend" or even "Rev." The only place that word appears in scripture is in Psalm 111:9 and it is a term used to describe how holy, special and worthy of reverence, fear and respect God's name is. No mere mortal man is deserving of this term and it was never intended to be used as a "title" anyway. I also have the same objection to the use of the term "Father" as applied to the so-called "priests" of the RCC in complete disregard of what the Word of God teaches in Matt. 23.

Bro.Greg:saint:

Bro. Greg,

This is just purely my opinion. No I would not use the terms you mentioned if I was a pastor. I think more important is the mindset of the person carrying a title. If the title gives a sense in the person of pride, arrogance, or above the average church member, then it is not the title that is evil, it is the person wearing it.

Sincerely,

His Royal Highness,

Michael
 

Thomas Helwys

New Member
Perhaps the key word in the Drfuss quote is "elevated."

Pastor, deacon, bishop were all titles of office indicating service with special responsibility. However, such titles were not "elevating" a person over another as more special in access to the Father.

Such came later along with confessionals, praying to saints, and relics.

I do think (if in fact I am right in my discernment of what was stated) that Drfuss has a good point to make.

Right! There is a difference in a title as an office and an artificial title such as Reverend which ascribes to man that which rightly belongs only to God.
 

Thomas Helwys

New Member
I will call my pastor Pastor, preacher, brother, my friend, and at times when in private I may even call him by his first name....but I will NOT call him or any other preacher "Reverend" or even "Rev." The only place that word appears in scripture is in Psalm 111:9 and it is a term used to describe how holy, special and worthy of reverence, fear and respect God's name is. No mere mortal man is deserving of this term and it was never intended to be used as a "title" anyway. I also have the same objection to the use of the term "Father" as applied to the so-called "priests" of the RCC in complete disregard of what the Word of God teaches in Matt. 23.

Bro.Greg:saint:

Totally agree!
 

Thomas Helwys

New Member
Bro. Greg,

This is just purely my opinion. No I would not use the terms you mentioned if I was a pastor. I think more important is the mindset of the person carrying a title. If the title gives a sense in the person of pride, arrogance, or above the average church member, then it is not the title that is evil, it is the person wearing it.

Sincerely,

His Royal Highness,

Michael

:laugh:

Shall I kiss your hand? :)
 

Thomas Helwys

New Member
Jesus was using hyperbole when he said to call no man father. He of course meant not to give any man the honor that is due only to God. Here are other examples of hyperbole that we can't (and don't) take literally:

[W]hen you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, when you give to the poor, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, Matthew 6:3.

If your right eye makes you stumble, tear it out and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 If your right hand makes you stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; for it is better for you to lose one of the parts of your body, than for your whole body to go into hell. Matthew 5:29-30.

But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you. Matthew 6:6.

Hyperbole? Incorrect.
 
Top