Ed Edwards:
I always assumed the opposite:
"glossa" mentioned in the Bible is the same as "modern glossa".
If you assume your assumption, then must of the use of "glossa"
in the Bible is contradicted.
How can it be the language of the angels, if it is of men's language?
How can it be talking to God alone, if it is of men's langauage?
Why is an interperter needed, if it is of men's langauge?
Why should only two or three speek glossa in one meeting --
what if there are people of six different languages
in the meeting?
I'm sure i could think of more, but i've got to be off to work.
hi Ed,
thanks for sharing your precious time here
btw, I came to this assumption just a few months ago. so before that, I, was just like you, believed that "glossa" can be the human-language and also the "modern glossa" (really really meaningless language for us).
but a few months ago, when I was having a debate with a fellow Indonesian in an Indonesian Christian mailing list, I started to change my mind.
(btw, the guy I debated is a charismatic movement follower. well, I started to debate him because he stated that Billy Graham is without the Holy Spirit since he doesn`t receive "glossa" gift
)
I found writings of Prof. William Samarin. He did a vast research about this topic. He recorded the "sound" and he said that, those kind of things are not languages at all....and fyi, the "sounds" are different from country to country.
should "glossa" depend on the speakers` nationality ??
Walguy has mentioned about it in his posting (Nov.25).
and as I started to compare those verses with "glossa" then I began to be sure that I would come to a conclusion that "modern glossa" is different from the real "glossa."
the only reason I still called it "assumption" is because I`m still trying to find anything that could tell me that I`m wrong....and for some reason, I cannot continue this research for awhile.....huh, I think I also need to learn some Greek to do that
and what about things that you said will contradict my assumption......
>How can it be the language of the angels, if it is of men's language?
I think I`d refer you to DHK`s answer for this one (posted Nov 30).
I think the Corinthians who received Paul`s letter understood that Paul didn`t mean that he could speak of an angelic "glossa"....he used that to stress that even such thing would be useless without love. that`s just a hyperbolic expression.....
and also, if Paul did mean he could speak the angelic "glossa" then we would come to an idea that the angels` language would cease too....??
human languages do cease....many, I guess, have ceased at this moment.
>How can it be talking to God alone, if it is of men's langauage?
let say that someone talks in Japanese and no person around him understands him....
then, would it be wrong to say that he is talking to God alone ?? especially, when even he, doesn`t understand Japanese
>Why is an interperter needed, if it is of men's langauge?
if I speak in Japanese in an english congregation.....what would you do ? prepare someone who can interpret my Japanese, or ask me to interpret it myself or just ask me to stay silence, right....
>Why should only two or three speek glossa in one meeting --
remember that Paul told us not do it in the same time....that could mean a loooong time for one person
let me refer a writing of Justin Martyr here.
(at the close of his larger Apology, describes the public worship more particularly, as it was conducted about the year 140)
"On Sunday a meeting of all, who live in the cities and villages, is held, and a section from the Memoirs of the Apostles (the Gospels) and the writings of the Prophets (the Old Testament) is read, as long as the time permits. When the reader has finished, the president, in a discourse, gives all exhortation to the imitation of these noble things. After this we all rise in common prayer. At the close of the prayer........"
please note...."as long as the time permits"
I think that if someone does "glossa" he would be allowed to do that "as long as the time permits"....since that would edify the congregation.
anyway, reading Martyr`s writing, it seems also that even the real "glossa" was not practised in the service anymore.
well, bye for now.
Gby,
-ken-