OldRegular
Well-Known Member
You are hardly qualified to declare whose doctrine is eisegesis and exegesis, lol.
You can show yourself competent in discussion of the issues, but you refuse to do that.
No thanks. My doctrine is not based on the work of others, but my own.
The only way you cur own view is through slander of others and their views, rather than presenting Biblical presentation to negate the veracity of the Rapture.
Honestly...you are stuck, my friend. You are consumed. You post false witness against people...you don't even know. You want to tell me what my doctrine is? Or do you actually want to address my doctrinal view?
Again, you have been given opportunity to, but you hide behind accusations and slander of people I am not even involved with, nor are many other Rapture adherents.
You will never, and I mean never...take the catching away of the Church out of the Bible.
And you will never, and I mean never...make Scripture conform to your doctrine, which is greatly lacking in reconciling that which is actually presented in Scripture and Prophecy.
The Church will not be caught up at the end of the Tribulation. The church will not be caught up prior to the establishment of the new heavens and earth.
The Church will be caught up in an event we cannot place within Tribulation events. The best place to see that is prior to the Tribulation.
Why would I want to, particularly when I have presented Biblical declarations which cannot be refuted?
But that's a problem for you. If it isn't taught by your group...it isn't true. Who cares what the Bible has to say about it...
God bless.
You have presented nothing that supports Darby's invention of the pre-trib-"snatching away" of the Church. Darby himself says it is based on Isaiah 32. Read Isaiah 32 and see if you can find the pre-trib-"snatching away" of the Church.
You present a lot of verbiage but your ramblings prove nothing. I have challenged this BB for 10+ years to present Scripture that clearly teaches a pre-trib-"snatching away" of the Church. To date no one has.
I can present Scripture that clearly teaches a General Resurrection and Judgment but you pre-tribbers prefer to believe the invention of Darby rather than the words of Jesus Christ! One more time:
John 5:28, 29
28. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,
29. And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
John MacArthur in his book Charismatic Chaos, page 94 writes:
The Reformers used the expression scriptura scripturam interpretatur, or ‘Scripture interprets Scripture.’ By this they meant that obscure passages in Scripture must be understood in light of clearer ones. If the Bible is God's Word, it must be consistent with itself. No part of the Bible can contradict any other part. One divine Author, the Holy Spirit, inspired the whole Bible, so it has one marvelous, supernatural unity. The synthesis principle puts Scripture together with Scripture to arrive at a clear, consistent meaning. If we hold to an interpretation of one passage that does not square with something in another passage, one of the passages is being interpreted incorrectly, or possibly both of them. The Holy Spirit does not disagree with himself. And the passages with obvious meanings should interpret the more arcane [obscure] ones. One should never build a doctrine on a single obscure or unclear text.
Unfortunately MacArthur himself does not cosistently follow the Synthesis Principle. As a dispensationalist he incorrectly interprets John 5:28, 29 which clearly teach a general resurrection and judgment. But John 5:28, 29 is not obscure. It clearly teaches a General Resurrection and Judgment and any other teaching is manifestly FALSE! So DC you are spouting a false doctrine!