Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
sag38 said:You didn't just dive in. You are shaking a hornet's nest.
When I use the KJV I use it because:
#1: It is the Word of God
#2: Most scripture that I have memorized is in KJV
#3: The language used in the Psalms and other poetry used in the KJV is great for weddings, funerals, etc.
When I use a MV I use it because:
#1: It is the Word of God
#2: I find it easier to understand
#3: The people I preach to find it easier to understand
Are you also calling the majority of black people in the USA "archaic" due to their ebonic dialect as being rooted in the same vernacular as found in the KJB?StefanM said:Top 3 Reasons against KJVO/pro MV:
1) The KJV's language is archaic.
Thank the Good LORD!2) The KJV does not reflect the results of scholarship over the past 400 years.
And as the world turns so does scholarship in the very same anit-God circles. Just ask nearly any modern scholar.3) MVs use contemporary language and reflect the centuries of scholarship.
The word of God does that already for us, so we need not answer the folly of men.:godisgood:small fry said:You are not what I would define as KJVO since you use both the KJ and MV. I am looking for died in the wool KJVO to defend the KJVO view. Maybe I need to add this to the OP.
Salamander said:Are you also calling the majority of black people in the USA "archaic" due to their ebonic dialect as being rooted in the same vernacular as found in the KJB?
Thank the Good LORD!
And as the world turns so does scholarship in the very same anit-God circles. Just ask nearly any modern scholar.