poncho
Well-Known Member
Yep. The Washington Post had to retract their own column. The writer himself said that the Pentagon was not his source. The Administration was not pushing the false story. If there is any record of Bush giving a speech and praising PFC Lynch for "fighting her way out of the hospital" I have not seen nor heard of it.
You don't even see what you're doing here do you NS?
Let me clue you in. You are desperately clinging to one tiny as yet unproven detail in a sea of utter deceit to try and convince the readers or maybe even yourself that there is no sea of deceit.
The evidence of this sea's existance is overwhelming. The Bush administration and the Pentagon were deeply involved in the dissemination of propaganda that has since been proven to be false.
One reporter's solemn word or straight faced denial is simply not enough to drain the sea. Especially a reporter employed by the Washington Post.
Fagitabotit.
Many Americans still insist or persist in believing that we have a free press, while getting most of their news from state-controlled television, under the misconception that reporters are meant to serve the public. Reporters are paid employees and serve the media owners, who usually cower when challenged by advertisers or major government figures. Robert Parry reported the first breaking stories about Iran-Contra for Associated Press that were largely ignored by the press and congress, then moving to Newsweek he witnessed a retraction of a true story for political reasons. In 'Fooling America: A Talk by Robert Parry' he said, "The people who succeeded and did well were those who didn't stand up, who didn't write the big stories, who looked the other way when history was happening in front of them, and went along either consciously or just by cowardice with the deception of the American people."
Major networks are primarily controlled by giant corporations that are obligated by law, to put the profits of their investors ahead of all other considerations which are often in conflict with the practice of responsible journalism. There were around 50 corporations a couple of decades ago, which was considered monopolistic by many and yet today, these companies have become larger and fewer in number as the biggest ones absorb their rivals. This concentration of ownership and power reduces the diversity of media voices, as news falls into the hands of large conglomerates with holdings in many industries that interferes in newsgathering, because of conflicts of interest. Mockingbird was an immense financial undertaking with funds flowing from the CIA largely through the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) founded by Tom Braden with Pat Buchanon of CNN's Crossfire.
Media corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other large corporations including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care, pharmaceutical, and technology companies. Until the 1980's, media systems were generally domestically owned, regulated, and national in scope. However, pressure from the IMF, World Bank, and US government to deregulate and privatize, the media, communication, and new technology resulted in a global commercial media system dominated by a small number of super-powerful transnational media corporations (mostly US based), working to advance the cause of global markets and the CIA agenda.
Our friendly red faced Washington Post reporter "Vern" seems to be succeeding and doing quite well these days doesn't he?
Last edited by a moderator: