Skandelon
<b>Moderator</b>
Sounds like you're making a case for Sovereign Grace to me.Originally posted by JBHorn:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Skandelon:
Jesus himself did not seem to have been a believer in Total Inability. We read in Mark 4:11,12 that he spoke in parables as a judgment against the obstinate Jews. The purpose of parables was to keep his message from entering their ears, "otherwise they might turn and be forgiven" (v.12). Had those stiff-necked people been allowed to hear the truth straight out, they might have turned to receive it. But how? Calvinism tells us that no one can turn and receive the forgiveness of sins because of Total Inability passed from Adam. There must first be an inward miracle of the heart, an "effectual call."
Calvinist preachers will sometimes say that they can never persuade natural men of the gospel no matter how openly, clearly and earnestly they may preach it. It is like presenting a sermon to a corpse - there is no response. Jesus, however, felt it necessary to obscure his message in parables to keep certain people from responding to it. Had he preached the truth openly they would have turned and been forgiven. This fact alone is fatal to the Calvinist dogma, for it contradicts the notion that all men have a native inability to believe.
more here
JB </font>[/QUOTE]If you mean by "sovereign grace" the dogma called, "Calvinism," then you obviously don't understand the point of my argument. Go back and read it one more and try again.
If you mean something else by the term "sovereign grace" then please explain.