• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Transubstantiation!!

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Matt Black:
Reconciliation is the mending of damage in a pre-existing relationship. To take a marital analogy, I am married to my wife (analogous to being born again and forgiven). However from time to time I regrettably offend her and hurt her feelings. That doesn't stop us being married but it does necessitate a reconciliation and mending of fences between us
Such mending and reconciliation is found only when we return to Cross which was done once for ALL, (not only for your time of salvation but also for your life thru !)

You would not find any new Reconciliation but the only one - Crucifixion of Jesus.

This is why you have to search for many things.
But for me, Jesus and His Crucifixion is everything and Jesus is ALL to me.

Have you ever prayed until you get the Answer from God, when you ask God the forgiveness of your sins? What was His answer?
 

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
His answer is Yes and He told me to tell you stop doubting His ability to do as He promises.
I am waiting for his own answer.

What you have to do is to verify whether you get the forgiveness at the time of Eucharist.

Were your sins not forgiven completely at the Cross?
Have you not ever believed this truth ?

YOu may be believing in hte INCOMPLETE Forgiveness !

This is what you have to worry about !
 

Chemnitz

New Member
I have no worries, I receive all of His forgiveness everytime, not in little pieces.

Why do I need to verify it? It's God's promises, His work, if He doesn't follow through it would make Him a liar but, God is no liar. So again, I have no worries.
 

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
I have no worries, I receive all of His forgiveness everytime, not in little pieces.
That is the typical confession by the people who have never experienced the True Salvation ONCE FOR ALL !

Do you get the salvation everytime ? How was it ?
 

Chemnitz

New Member
You know, I am sick of your questioning people's salvation.

So if I had experienced True Salvation Once FOR ALL by your means I would be living in continual doubt and worry?

I will not apologize for not basing my salvation on an empty emotional experience over the promises God. And He has promised to connect us to the salvation won on the cross through the means of Baptism, Communion, and the Word.
 

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
And He has promised to connect us to the salvation won on the cross through the means of Baptism, Communion, and the Word. [/QB]
but you are relying on the Works like Baptism, Communion. That'swhy you are saying the Incomplete Forgiveness at the Cross as one who needs to get the forgiveness every week by the Eucharist.

Any emotional experience is not the core of the salvation at all. It may follow the belief, but the core of the salvation is the invisible relationship with God. It is very much spiritual in depth.

For example, when Martin Luther realized about Romans 1:17, don't you think he had never read that part of Bible before? Holy Spirit comes with the Words. If anyone doesn't have the personal relationship with God, even though he or she knows much theory on Bible, that person is not saved.
(personal innuendo removed)

[ February 15, 2006, 01:47 AM: Message edited by: DHK ]
 

Chemnitz

New Member
I have asked and I have asked that you quit questioning the salvation of me and others, I ask no longer. I am reporting your last post.
 

Chemnitz

New Member
BTW since you keep throwing around Luther as if you knew what you are talking about, maybe you should read what he has actually written concerning various things such as Baptism and the Lord's Supper.

On Baptism
10] For to be baptized in the name of God is to be baptized not by men, but by God Himself. Therefore,
although it is performed by human hands, it is nevertheless truly God's own work. From this fact every one may
himself readily infer that it is a far higher work than any work performed by a man or a saint. For what work
greater than the work of God can we do?

17] Comprehend the difference, then, that Baptism is quite another thing than all other water; not on account of
the natural quality but because something more noble is here added; for God Himself stakes His honor, His
power and might on it. Therefore it is not only natural water, but a divine, heavenly, holy, and blessed water,
and in whatever other terms we can praise it,—all on account of the Word, which is a heavenly, holy Word, that
no one can sufficiently extol, for it has, and is able to do, all that God is and can do [since it has all the virtue
and power of God comprised in it]. 18] Hence also it derives its essence as a Sacrament, as St. Augustine also
taught: Accedat verbum ad elementum et fit sacramentum. That is, when the Word is joined to the element or
natural substance, it becomes a Sacrament, that is, a holy and divine matter and sign.

26] Here you see again how highly and precious we should esteem Baptism, because in it we obtain such an
unspeakable treasure, which also indicates sufficiently that it cannot be ordinary mere water. For mere water
could not do such a thing, but the Word does it, and (as said above) the fact that the name of God is
comprehended therein. 27] But where the name of God is, there must be also life and salvation, that it may
indeed be called a divine, blessed, fruitful, and gracious water; for by the Word such power is imparted to
Baptism that it is a laver of regeneration, as St. Paul also calls it, Titus 3, 5.

28] But as our would-be wise, new spirits assert that faith alone saves, and that works and external things avail
nothing, we answer: It is true, indeed, that nothing in us is of any avail but faith, as we shall hear still further. 29]
But these blind guides are unwilling to see this, namely, that faith must have something which it believes, that
is, of which it takes hold, and upon which it stands and rests. Thus faith clings to the water, and believes that it
is Baptism, in which there is pure salvation and life; not through the water (as we have sufficiently stated), but
through the fact that it is embodied in the Word and institution of God, and the name of God inheres in it. Now,
if I believe this, what else is it than believing in God as in Him who has given and planted His Word into this
ordinance, and proposes to us this external thing wherein we may apprehend such a treasure?
On the Lord's Supper
Answer: It is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, in and under the bread and wine which we
Christians are commanded by the Word of Christ to eat and to drink. 9] And as we have said of Baptism that it
is not simple water, so here also we say the Sacrament is bread and wine, but not mere bread and wine, such
as are ordinarily served at the table, but bread and wine comprehended in, and connected with, the Word of
God.
10] It is the Word (I say) which makes and distinguishes this Sacrament, so that it is not mere bread and wine,
but is, and is called, the body and blood of Christ. For it is said: Accedat verbum ad elementum, et fit
sacramentum. If the Word be joined to the element, it becomes a Sacrament. This saying of St. Augustine is so
properly and so well put that he has scarcely said anything better. The Word must make a Sacrament of the
element, else it remains a mere element. 11] Now, it is not the word or ordinance of a prince or emperor, but of
the sublime Majesty, at whose feet all creatures should fall, and affirm it is as He says, and accept it with all
reverence, fear, and humility.

12] With this Word you can strengthen your conscience and say: If a hundred thousand devils, together with all
fanatics, should rush forward, crying, How can bread and wine be the body and blood of Christ? etc., I know
that all spirits and scholars together are not as wise as is the Divine Majesty in His little finger. 13] Now here
stands the Word of Christ: Take, eat; this is My body; Drink ye all of it; this is the new testament in My blood,
etc. Here we abide, and would like to see those who will constitute themselves His masters, and make it
different from what He has spoken. It is true, indeed, that if you take away the Word or regard it without the
words, you have nothing but mere bread and wine. 14] But if the words remain with them, as they shall and
must, then, in virtue of the same, it is truly the body and blood of Christ. For as the lips of Christ say and speak,
so it is, as He can never lie or deceive.

23] On this account it is indeed called a food of souls, which nourishes and strengthens the new man. For by
Baptism we are first born anew; but (as we said before) there still remains, besides, the old vicious nature of
flesh and blood in man, and there are so many hindrances and temptations of the devil and of the world that we
often become weary and faint, and sometimes also stumble.

31] Therefore also it is vain talk when they say that the body and blood of Christ are not given and shed for us
in the Lord's Supper, hence we could not have forgiveness of sins in the Sacrament. For although the work is
accomplished and the forgiveness of sins acquired on the cross, yet it cannot come to us in any other way than
through the Word. For what would we otherwise know about it, that such a thing was accomplished or was to
be given us if it were not presented by preaching or the oral Word? Whence do they know of it, or how can they
apprehend and appropriate to themselves the forgiveness, except they lay hold of and believe the Scriptures
and the Gospel? 32] But now the entire Gospel and the article of the Creed: I believe a holy Christian Church,
the forgiveness of sin, etc., are by the Word embodied in this Sacrament and presented to us. Why, then,
should we allow this treasure to be torn from the Sacrament when they must confess that these are the very
words which we hear every where in the Gospel, and they cannot say that these words in the Sacrament are of
no use, as little as they dare say that the entire Gospel or Word of God, apart from the Sacrament, is of no
use?

Large Catechism
 

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
I have asked and I have asked that you quit questioning the salvation of me and others, I ask no longer. I am reporting your last post.
1)Is it wrong if a believer ask about the salvation of others?

2) Is it wrong if the believer comments on whether such person is holding on the wrong belief about the salvation ?

3) Read the followings:

2 Cor 13:5
Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?


Phil 4:3
intreat thee also, true yokefellow, help those women which laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and with other my fellowlabourers, whose names are in the book of life.

1 John 2:19
They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.


Gal 4: 16
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth ?
 

Eliyahu

Active Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
2 But as our would-be wise, new spirits assert that faith alone saves, and that works and external things avail nothing, we answer : It is true, indeed, that nothing in us is of any avail but faith, as we shall hear still further . 29]
Thus faith clings to the water , and believes that it
is Baptism, in which there is pure salvation and life;

Now I can understand what is wrong with Lutheran. If Martin Luther stated that, Luther is wrong. If any of his successors establishes such Catechism, they are wrong!

They started from Faith Only then finishes with Faith + Works as

Galatians 3:3
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?


Baptism means the official declaration of Salvation already received by Faith alone.
You don't understand this because you don't have the actual experience of this.
I was baptized 5 years before I was truly saived. After my salvation, I was baptized again.

If you are baptized without the actual Being Born Again, even though you are baptized thousand times, you are not saved !

Remember the Robber at the Cross. Was he baptized ? Didn't he get the assurance that he would go to Paradise ?
 

Chemnitz

New Member
Why am I not surprised that you completely missed Luther's point. You seemed to be very good at yanking phrases out of context and twisting their meaning. Luther states from the beginning it is not a work of man, it is a work of God.


Baptism means the official declaration of Salvation already received by Faith alone.
You don't understand this because you don't have the actual experience of this.
I was baptized 5 years before I was truly saived. After my salvation, I was baptized again.
Why do you insist on basing theological principles on extrabiblical sources such as your experiences? Why should I put my trust in something as ephemeral as my flawed experiences and recollections?

It is no wonder that Satan was able to trick you into doubting God's promises for you and thereby drive you to the brink of destruction.
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by Eliyahu:
Originally posted by Chemnitz:
2 But as our would-be wise, new spirits assert that faith alone saves, and that works and external things avail nothing, we answer : It is true, indeed, that nothing in us is of any avail but faith, as we shall hear still further . 29]
Thus faith clings to the water , and believes that it
is Baptism, in which there is pure salvation and life;

Now I can understand what is wrong with Lutheran. If Martin Luther stated that, Luther is wrong. If any of his successors establishes such Catechism, they are wrong!

They started from Faith Only then finishes with Faith + Works as

Galatians 3:3
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?


Baptism means the official declaration of Salvation already received by Faith alone.
You don't understand this because you don't have the actual experience of this.
I was baptized 5 years before I was truly saived. After my salvation, I was baptized again.

If you are baptized without the actual Being Born Again, even though you are baptized thousand times, you are not saved !

Remember the Robber at the Cross. Was he baptized ? Didn't he get the assurance that he would go to Paradise ?
Why were you baptised twice? And the thief on the cross did undergo baptism - re-read Matt 20:22 and Luke 12:50
 

Alexander

New Member
Chemnitz,

You hit the nail on the head.

So much of fundamentalist theology is based on extra-biblical sources. What is even more dangerous is the fact that the extra-biblical basis results in non-biblical theology.

So many of the posters here rely on flawed Biblical exegesis and rely instead on recent thinking that cannot be squared with God's promises, Scriptural norms and apostolic practice. When we take recent sociological, historical and personal thinking and project it backwards 2,000 years and then search for Scripture to support it, we can arrive at very flawed conclusions. However, if we take Scripture at its word and apostolic and early Church practice as the norm, we will more often arrive at the truth.


Alexander
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Exactly.

Re sola scriptura churches not having Tradition, well any fule kno that they do have their own Tradition, much of extra-Bibllcal or based on faulty exegesis outwith the mind of Christ's Church. I know that in my dealings with fundie Baptists here and elsewhere for example that despite their assertions that they are SS and practise 'soul liberty', you try exercising that soul liberty by trying to preach a sermon on baptismal regeneration in a Baptist church ( based on your interpretation of Scripture) and you will discover very quickly that they jolly well do have a Tradition!
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jude 3-4:" Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for THE FAITH which was once(FOR ALL) delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turing the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ." Emphasis and parenthetical mine.

The "traditions" of men are the problem, not "keeping the faith". Jesus put it like this: "In vain ye do worship, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." He was talking to the religious leaders--Scribes, Pharisees, High Priests, and other Right Reverend Doctors, who were blocking the gates of heaven with their false teachings.

Selah,

Bro. James
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But what if Tradition is the way of 'keeping the faith'? I'm not talking about the pharasaical traditions of men but the Tradition of the Church, the "pillar and foundation of the Truth" (I Tim 3:15). There are of course plenty of 'traditions of men' around - see my last post for an example.
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
For every truth there is a pseudo. The tradition to which you seem to refer comes from the Philosophy of Aristotle and the Hiearchy of the Roman Empire, through the tradition of man called: Pontifex Maximus.

These traditions cannot be found in scripture except for some Apocryphal writings, which are no scripture at all. This is why the "powers that be" did not want the scripture translated into the common vernacular. The doctrines of men are exposed for exactly what they are: false teachings from the father of lies.

This is also why sola scriptura is not a popular notion with the holy see, nor her daughters.

"Let God be true, and every man a liar."

Selah,

Bro. James
 

Matt Black

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
According to your opinion. Aristotelianism was only imported - unilaterally - into the medieval Catholic Church by the scholastics and Luther rightly rejected its consequences
 
Top