• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump being Trump

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Trump was being himself at the debate - some say he was a bully

But I was thinking - if he has a showdown with another world leader,
I am confident that Trump will not back down

NOTE: not saying he would use the A bomb - but he doesent mess around

OPen for discussion
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
IMO, POT:S has the best political instincts of any candidate I can think of in my life time. It is crude and unconventional at times, but he always has a purpose.

He was being himself, but it was a strategy. His conduct in the debate was planned. His purpose was to frustrate Bid:n into making a mistake.

I have often been surprised at the public reaction to these types of incidents. I haven’t seen many polls which makes me think it’s trending his way.

If that is true, it is more evidence his political instincts are great.

peace to you
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Trump was being himself at the debate - some say he was a bully

But I was thinking - if he has a showdown with another world leader,
I am confident that Trump will not back down

NOTE: not saying he would use the A bomb - but he doesent mess around

OPen for discussion
I am tired of the left calling everybody a bully. My son came home from school talking about bullies. I find out they are having bully education and sensitivity training. I told him to go back to school and tell his teacher that "y'all think every real man that has a pair is a bully. Dad says he is not raising a queer, he is raising a man."
That's what he told them. They know better than to call me.

Queer is now a proper and acceptable term thanks to LBGTQ+.
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Trump is not a bully, but he’s not intimidated by them either. This is why the Dems and their MSM hate him so much. He stands up to their bullying. He would work with them if they were interested, but they want to control, and are willing to destroy America to have it.

On the world stage, Trump takes a similar stance. If you play right, we can play together. If not, we can fight, and “We’ll knock the stuffing out of ‘em.”

While that’s not really possible, you can make them less able to use “the snip in ‘em.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Please watch your language. It's bad enough if a non-Christian adult came on this board and read such language, even worse if a child read that. We are to be witnesses to the world, not act and talk and write like the world.
Your sanctimonious attempt to be condescending carries little weight considering the bottom line morality results of your reasoning that is far worse than anything in RT's argument.
 

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A stunning accusation to make toward someone who was a virgin until he got married at 38 years of age. Care to explain?
Bud, you really have a serious following the premises in an argument. Your pre-marital virginity has nothing to do with "the results of your reasoning" concerning this election.
yercrazy.gif
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Bud, you really have a serious following the premises in an argument. Your pre-marital virginity has nothing to do with "the results of your reasoning" concerning this election.

If we are discussing voting, then why did you bring morality into it?
 

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If we are discussing voting, then why did you bring morality into it?

LOL... YOU brought the morality issue into THIS! That is why I used the word in describing your argument above, "sanctimonious". The morality issue rained back down on you. Try to keep up, eh...
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Trump was being himself at the debate - some say he was a bully

But I was thinking - if he has a showdown with another world leader,
I am confident that Trump will not back down

NOTE: not saying he would use the A bomb - but he doesent mess around

OPen for discussion

I was just telling my wife this AM that as much as I hate to listen his rhetoric, but love his actions, he is just doing what he has been doing since he started his campaign.
And if, as I believe, God has placed him here for a specific purpose, he had best just keep on "being the obnoxious egotist that he has always been" - hey, it's worked so far!!
How many times have "the walls closed in" on him, but just like the energizer bunny that keeps on running& a Timex watch that takes a lickin but keeps on tickin he has outlived the worst critic's condemnation!!!
I say just let him keep on keepin' on!!!:Thumbsup:Thumbsup:Thumbsup
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
I am tired of the left calling everybody a bully. My son came home from school talking about bullies. I find out they are having bully education and sensitivity training. I told him to go back to school and tell his teacher that "y'all think every real man that has a pair is a bully. Dad says he is not raising a queer, he is raising a man."
That's what he told them. They know better than to call me.

Queer is now a proper and acceptable term thanks to LBGTQ+.
The more you post, the more I doubt

peace to you
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
Trump is not a bully, but he’s not intimidated by them either. This is why the Dems and their MSM hate him so much. He stands up to their bullying. He would work with them if they were interested, but they want to control, and are willing to destroy America to have it.

On the world stage, Trump takes a similar stance. If you play right, we can play together. If not, we can fight, and “We’ll knock the stuffing out of ‘em.”

While that’s not really possible, you can make them less able to use “the snip in ‘em.”
Oops. Sorry. If the word is too strong, the least they could do is consistently edit it, in which case the "snip" should also be "stuffing."

Of course, had it not been a direct quote, the word wouldn't have been there anyway, at least not in context. Next time, maybe I'll try substituting "devil" for "[stuffing]." :Rolleyes Or will it have to reduced to the proverbial "fool"? (Prov. 27:22; 22:15) :Wink
 
Top