Trump Caves Second Time

[Reynolds]

Proving it was not is just as a burden

You made the claim. Prove it.

 

[Reynolds]

There were no WMD in Iraq, no stockpiles whatsoever. The lie that Sadaam quickly moved or destroyed them is unsupported by any proof. If you could share any verifiable proof of this I will back down.

Whatever you do with your life is your business. You can’t throw fake news around and get away unchallenged. You may sincerely believe in lies but in a public forum they will be challenged.

Then just bring the proof the allegations are based on. That’s called evidence in other circles.

More human life has been wasted from the US imperialism than Iran will ever accomplish in a hundred years. Terrorism is in the eyes of the beholder

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. All is fair in love and war. Anyone opposing the USA is an enemy. Call them soldiers or terrorists, if they are our enemy; it's our job to swiftly and awfully defeat them in battle.

 

[Agent47]

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. All is fair in love and war. Anyone opposing the USA is an enemy. Call them soldiers or terrorists, if they are our enemy; it's our job to swiftly and awfully defeat them in battle.

Which is why Iran is as credible as Trump when it comes bombing the tankers and downing the drone. Culpability is a matter of faith

So far Iran has won and is winning.

JCPOA is supported by many including US allies despite Trump pulling out,and Iran will breach parts of the agreement as the consideration for compliance is no more.

Nobody apart from US is convinced Iran blew up the tankers

And only Trump believes the drone was on international waters

 

[Reynolds]

Which is why Iran is as credible as Trump when it comes bombing the tankers and downing the drone. Culpability is a matter of faith

So far Iran has won and is winning.

JCPOA is supported by many including US allies despite Trump pulling out,and Iran will breach parts of the agreement as the consideration for compliance is no more.

Nobody apart from US is convinced Iran blew up the tankers

And only Trump believes the drone was on international waters

Nothing about Iran in modern history is credible.
England backed the U.S. assessment that the mines were Iranian.
What foreign powers, other than Iran, have said the drone was in Iranian airspace?
The nuclear deal was a disaster.

 

[Agent47]

Nothing about Iran in modern history is credible.
England backed the U.S. assessment that the mines were Iranian.
What foreign powers, other than Iran, have said the drone was in Iranian airspace?
The nuclear deal was a disaster.

Russia has evidence the drone was well inside Iranian airspace.

What is so credible about US? Fake ‘war in terror’ while partnering with the biggest exporter of terrorism,Saudi Arabia? Regime changes in Libya ,Iraq? Come on. UN called for independent investigations. Absent of that I’d say US shouldn’t be trusted. Britain has yet to share its own evidence. Point is, it’s not about how many believe Iran did it but evidence.

It was a disaster only as far as Trump is concerned. Britain, France, Germany, Russia all are firmly behind it. And it worked. Israel attempted to forge ‘evidence’ of breaching the agreement but couldn’t even convince themselves.

Obama’s ME policy was very clear. Can you tell me what Trump’s policy is?

 

[Revmitchell]

Which is why Iran is as credible as Trump when it comes bombing the tankers and downing the drone. Culpability is a matter of faith

So far Iran has won and is winning.

JCPOA is supported by many including US allies despite Trump pulling out,and Iran will breach parts of the agreement as the consideration for compliance is no more.

Nobody apart from US is convinced Iran blew up the tankers

And only Trump believes the drone was on international waters

Nothing about this post is true