• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump judge nominee, 36, who has never tried a case, wins approval of Senate panel

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
You agree with sotomayor and the other liberals over Thomas and Scalia?
I believe Justices should honor their conservative judicial philosophy and practice judicial restraint even when it is their own ox being gored. Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito suddenly abandoned their principles and became activist judges when presented with a law they disagreed with politically. So much for "principle."
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I believe Justices should honor their conservative judicial philosophy and practice judicial restraint even when it is their own ox being gored. Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito suddenly abandoned their principles and became activist judges when presented with a law they disagreed with politically. So much for "principle."
No, they recognized that the statute was Unconstitutional as written and refrained from the activism of fixing the law from the bench. Fixing a law instead of interpreting it is the classic example of activism. It is legislating from the bench.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, they recognized that the statute was Unconstitutional as written and refrained from the activism of fixing the law from the bench. Fixing a law instead of interpreting it is the classic example of activism. It is legislating from the bench.

Agreed. It's up to the legislators designate somethings as a tax, not judges.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, they recognized that the statute was Unconstitutional as written and refrained from the activism of fixing the law from the bench. Fixing a law instead of interpreting it is the classic example of activism. It is legislating from the bench.
Shocking
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You don't get it. In today's world the founding Fathers would be call far right but they are the standard in this country. The far left are those who are on the opposite end of the standard for this country. Those who support the founding principles are only supporting the primary standard for this country therefore they cannot be far anything. They are right where they should be unlike those who support your extreme (being hat which is in opposition to the founding of this country)
The founders of America were revolutionaries. In no sense were they conservative. The conservatives of that time supported the British and were traitors.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The founders of America were revolutionaries. In no sense were they conservative. The conservatives of that time supported the British and were traitors.

There were no American conservatives at that time on either side as there were no national values yet to conserve. Conservatives are those that support our founding documents, the declaration of independence and the constitution.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
So you don't accept recommendations from the American Bar Association?
Why would I accept a recommendation from the radical left wing lawyers union?

What about the American medical Association?
Why would I support a group that counts only about 25% of doctors among its members but spends more on lobbying than all other such organizations combined? Do you support their endorsements? They endorsed Obamacare then endorsed Trump's choice for secretary of health and human services, Representative Tom Price, an orthopedic surgeon-turned-congressman who’s led the charge to overturn Obamacare. Duh!

What about the Nobel prize Committee?
What about them? They gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize before he ever did anything. You mean the same Nobel committee who refused to give Henry Eyring a prize because he was a Mormon? Or how about Fritz Haber who developed poison gas used in World War I who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918.

No thanks, to all of the above.
 

Squire Robertsson

Administrator
Administrator
FTW, I beg to differ. The Founders were conservatives. Initially, all they sought was their expectations as free-born Englishmen. They expected the king to rule through their legislatures. They expected to have their representatives vote on their taxes. The problem is it took London about 100 years and the AmRev to figure out how to deal with its colonies (at least those settled by Europeans.
London thought it could treat its American colonies in the same fashion as it did Ireland.
 

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The founders of America were revolutionaries. In no sense were they conservative. The conservatives of that time supported the British and were traitors.

They were? Alright, so -80+ years later, the northern government wanted things to keep the south under its control and force them to buy their own industrialized products for more than it should cost them to buy foreign. If you define "traitors" as they those opposed to independence, then who were the traitors?
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Man you are just lost
Why do you think they called it the Revolutionary War. Were Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale and Samuel Adams quiet, unassuming keepers of the status quo? They were radicals intent on overthrowing the government by the British.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They were? Alright, so -80+ years later, the northern government wanted things to keep the south under its control and force them to buy their own industrialized products for more than it should cost them to buy foreign. If you define "traitors" as they those opposed to independence, then who were the traitors?
Do you even know what the term conservative means? It means someone who wants to maintain the status quo. Yes, our forefathers were liberal even radical. The Civil War was about slavery pure and simple (and I'm a Southerner). Should Christians support slavery? I say not.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I rank him among the worst and I am far from the radical right.

C Span. Well, there is an unbiased source! LOL!

Stupid move. Political move. But perfectly constitutional.
... What CSpan does is broadcast meetings of the Congress. That's "liberal?"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top