• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump lawyer says James Comey made ‘unauthorized disclosures’ of privileged talks

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
All I can say is, you mess with the bull, you get the horns. Knowing Trump, I don't know what these guys were thinking. You may not like him, but no one thinks he's stupid, and everyone knows he's a fighter. Comey may now be in the battle of his life, and for what? To spread some temporary fake news, sure to be debunked? I have a feeling he's going to find himself in jail.


Trump lawyer says James Comey made ‘unauthorized disclosures’ of privileged talks

David Jackson , USA TODAY Published 2:12 p.m. ET June 8, 2017 | Updated 17 minutes ago

WASHINGTON — While President Trump stayed unusually silent on James Comey, his lawyer stressed Thursday that Comey's testimony proved that Trump did not collude with Russia during last year's election, and he went on to accuse the former FBI director of directing unauthorized news leaks to intentionally damage the president.

"Mr. Comey’s testimony also makes clear that the president never sought to impede the investigation into attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election," his attorney Marc Kasowitz said.

"And in fact, according to Mr. Comey, the president told Mr. Comey 'it would be good to find out” in that investigation if there were “some ‘satellite’ associates of his who did something wrong.'"

Kasowitz criticized Comey for his testimony, though, noting the ex-director "admitted that he unilaterally and surreptitiously made unauthorized disclosures to the press of privileged communications with the president."

Trump's lawyer was referring to the memos Comey kept on conversations he had with the president.

In testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey said he moved to make aspects of his contemporaneous memos public by enlisting a friend to share contents of his own notes with a reporter, after the president suggested in a tweet there might be secret recordings of his conversations with Comey.
Comey said he hoped news reports would prompt the appointment of a special counsel. Indeed, the Justice Department appointed former FBI director Robert Mueller as special counsel to oversee the Russia probe just one day after the existence of the memos was disclosed.

Yet Kasowitz said the New York Times reported on the memos before that presidential post. Calling Comey's action "retaliatory," Kasowitz said that "we will leave it the appropriate authorities to determine whether this leaks should be investigated along with all those others being investigated."

However, there is no evidence that the Times quoted from Comey memos before Trump tweeted about possible "tapes" of their conversations in a post dated May 12. The first Times story on the memos appeared May 16.

Trump himself discussed his "privileged conversations" with Comey during an interview with NBC News two days after his abrupt firing of the director on May 9.

Kasowitz's statement did not address Comey's testimony before the Senate panel that he kept notes out of concern that Trump might later lie about the nature of their conversations.

Comey said he began documenting his interactions with the president starting with his first meeting on Jan. 6 after a tense briefing at Trump Tower. “It was the subject matter and the person I was interacting with," he said. “It was the nature of the person. I was honestly concerned that he would lie about the nature of our meeting."

Critics of Trump, including Democratic lawmakers, said Comey's accounts could add up to an effort by Trump to obstruct justice in an investigation of links between Trump campaign associates and Russians who tried to influence last year's election.

Comey said Trump repeatedly asked him to somehow resolve the Russia investigation, and pressed him to drop the inquiry into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

"He (Trump) described the Russia investigation as 'a cloud' that was impairing his ability to act on behalf of the country," Comey testified. Comey said he told the president that "we were investigating the matter as quickly as we could, and that there would be great benefit, if we didn’t find anything, to our having done the work well."

Kasowitz said in a written statement that Trump "never pressured Mr. Comey" into dropping the Russia investigation, and never sought a loyalty oath from the FBI director. "It is now established that there the president was not being investigated for colluding with the or attempting to obstruct that investigation," Kasowitz said "As the committee pointed out today, these important facts for the country to know are virtually the only facts that have not leaked during the long course of these events."

White House spokesperson Sarah Sanders declined comment on the former FBI director's testimony on Thursday, deferring instead to Kasowitz's statement, but she did dispute one aspect of Comey's testimony. "I can definitely say the president is not a liar," Sanders said. "It’s frankly insulting that that question would be asked.”

In the hearing, Comey also said Trump “defamed me and the FBI’’ after the president dismissed him last month. "Those were lies, plain and simple, and I am so sorry the FBI workforce had to hear them, and the American people were told them," Comey said.

As Comey testified that he would welcome the release of any tapes of conversations he had with Trump, Sanders also said she has "no idea" if there is a taping system in the White House.

Trump watched parts of the hearing with top aides, including members of his legal team, in a private dining room at the White House.

He did not tweet about the Comey hearing, nor did he mention the testimony specifically during a midday speech to a group of religious conservatives. Trump did, however, tell supporters that "we're under siege," and "we will come out bigger and better and stronger than ever."
In his testimony, Comey also essentially confirmed the president's claim that on three occasions the FBI director told the president he was not personally under investigation – statements Comey said Trump urged him to make public.

In his written statement, Comey said the FBI and Justice Department believed there were a number of reasons not to make that kind of statement publicly, "most importantly because it would create a duty to correct, should that change."

In addition to the Comey hearing, Trump has what spokesman Sean Spicer called "a full day" of presidential activity on Thursday.

It included the midday speech to the Faith and Freedom Coalition's Road to Majority Conference, and a mid-afternoon meeting with a group of mayors and governors to discuss infrastructure plans.

Trump's focus, Spicer said, "is going to be on pursuing the agenda and the priorities that he was elected to do."

source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-james-comey-hearing-marc-kasowitz/102588032/
 
Last edited:

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
All I can say is, you mess with the bull, you get the horns. Knowing Trump, I don't know what these guys were thinking.
Knowing Trump, I think "these guys" are doing what needs to be done.

You may not like him, but no one thinks he's stupid, and everyone knows he's a fighter.
You are forgetting his massive self-destructive streak and his compulsive need to strike out at everyone he thinks might not adore him. Trump has set in motion much of what is transpiring now. For instance, Trump's suggestion that there may be "tapes" of his conversations with Comey (and the implied threat) kicked off this latest drama. And it is interesting that the Trump administration - including Trump - will not answer the question regarding whether or not the conversations are recorded. A simple denial of that would be easy to give, but since they haven't committed to that, it suggests that something exists - and Comey wants it come out. That is telling.

Comey may now be in the battle of his life, and for what?
I don't see him in a "battle" at all. He comes across as quite credible. I realize that Trump and his supporters claim that Comey vindicates Trump by his testimony - except where Comey does not - and Comey's testimony should be accepted as credible where it supports Trump's account, but not should be considered credible where it makes Trump look bad.

So let's hear those recordings and see who is credible. Comey wants them released and Trump can't seem to answer a question about whether or not they exist after trying to intimidate Comey with the suggestion of their existence. Very telling.

President Trump can't have it both ways. Moreover, there are a lot of things that were apparently revealed in a confidential session yesterday afternoon.

To spread some temporary fake news, sure to be debunked?
Nothing Comey has said seems to be "fake news." However, I look forward to the debunking, since it should be relatively easy to do with official switchboard records, visitor logs, testimony of others in the administration and the heads of the FBI to corroborate what Comey told them and when.

I may be incorrect, but I haven't seen any part of Comey's testimony debunked yet. Moreover, Comey has substantial evidence for his testimony that can be verified. I'm sure some diligent reporters are attempting to review the dates and times of contact, as well as other aspects of the story.

I have a feeling he's going to find himself in jail.
Comey in jail? Not unless Trump takes over the government and begins jailing people he does not like.

On the other hand, I anticipate that there may be a number of people in Trump's campaign and administration who wind up in jail - possibly including Trump.

We will see how this plays out.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
For instance, Trump's suggestion that there may be "tapes" of his conversations with Comey (and the implied threat) kicked off this latest drama. And it is interesting that the Trump administration - including Trump - will not answer the question regarding whether or not the conversations are recorded. A simple denial of that would be easy to give, but since they haven't committed to that, it suggests that something exists - and Comey wants it come out. That is telling.

So let's hear those recordings and see who is credible. Comey wants them released and Trump can't seem to answer a question about whether or not they exist after trying to intimidate Comey with the suggestion of their existence. Very telling.

Trump: "Obama put tapp on my phones in Trump Tower." (no evidence has emerged.)

Q: "Are there tapes of the Comey/Trump conversations?"
White House: "We don't know."
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
President Trump promises he will testify under oath about the Comey matter ("One hundred percent"), but that promise is only as good as his word.

He also claimed he will answer the question about whether or not he has recordings of Comey "...sometime in the near future." Since we are still waiting for his tax returns from previous years and this year, so I'm not holding my breath.

Anyone want to express confidence that Trump will stand by these assurances?

Calminian?
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The WH didn't say they didn't know whether there were these tapes or not, they just refused to comment on it:

Conway dodges on existence of Trump-Comey 'tapes'

I doubt there are any tapes. Trump was just playing mind games again, to try to keep Comey honest. I'm still glad Comey is gone, he's been a tool for ages. Loretta tells him not to call the case a case and he does. He trusts Obama but couldn't trust Trump, so he kept notes then leaked his own note to some professor in NYC and ran to the press with it just so Comey would get a special prosecutor appointed. Then he asked for a private meeting with Trump and later claims he freaked out because it was a private meeting.

Then there was Comey's behavior during the election - he makes a strong case for Hillary to be indicted then backs off at the last minute, mumbling something about "intent", runs away until days before the election, then opens up the case again (and why?), drops it right before Election Day, "clearing" Hillary again. Good riddance.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The WH didn't say they didn't know whether there were these tapes or not, they just refused to comment on it:

Conway dodges on existence of Trump-Comey 'tapes'

I doubt there are any tapes. Trump was just playing mind games again, to try to keep Comey honest.
If so, that's an incredibly stupid thing to do.

Comey has documented things for months with multiple witnesses regarding the alleged conversations. Moreover, Comey welcomes any recordings because he believes that will corroborate his testimony.

So now we have a President who will not say if there are recordings, but is pressed for them now, with a legal adversary that Trump has claimed has perjured himself who WANTS the recordings released.

If there are recordings and Comey has perjured himself, then Trump can simply say that there are recordings and that they are preparing to release them, shifting credibility to Trump. But Trump's evasiveness about the existence of recordings points to either (1) there are no recordings and Trump was simply trying to pressure Comey; or (2) that there are recordings and they do not help Trump's assertions.

Comey has all the credibility and Trump has little, if any, until Trump can produce evidence to refute Comey's testimony.

Loretta tells him not to call the case a case and he does.
And did you noticed that he brought that out in his testimony when it did not help the Democrats? That actually enhances his credibility since he demonstrated his resentment when politicians interfere with investigations. It shows he is non-partisan.

He trusts Obama but couldn't trust Trump...
He had almost no dealings with Obama and Obama apparently didn't make those kinds of alleged requests from him.

...so he kept notes...
That's a standard thing to do. I have had to document an encounter before to protect myself and I did something quite similar. Fortunately the authority figure who threatened me did not follow through on the threats or attack me in public, so that was the end of it.

...then leaked his own note to some professor in NYC and ran to the press with it...
Yep, that's the way you have to do it when the regular systems of checks and balances break down. I would have gone to the press with my aforementioned documentation to protect myself if the threatener had gone after me.

...just so Comey would get a special prosecutor appointed.
He didn't do that alone. President Trump created the conditions where Comey decided to act and Comey was considered credible enough for there to be a special prosecutor appointed.

Then he asked for a private meeting with Trump and later claims he freaked out because it was a private meeting.
Comey denies that he requested a private meeting with Trump - that's one of the major issues - but that assertion can likely be verified through a few different means.

Then there was Comey's behavior during the election - he makes a strong case for Hillary to be indicted then backs off at the last minute, mumbling something about "intent"...
Mumbling? You are quite creative. I think the issue was that he found her to be technically incompetent when it comes to servers, email, proper security, and the dangers of hacking. That's actually easy to believe, since I spend quite a bit of time sorting out the technological difficulties of family members over 65 years of age.

That said, I'm quite unhappy with the way Ms. Clinton handled all of that. I am also unhappy with the current Republican line that Trump is also incompetent and he doesn't know he is not supposed to ask people leading investigations into his political allies to drop them.

...runs away until days before the election...
Where did he go? Did he tie up his possessions in a bandanna and hang them off the end of a pole while he rode the rails?

...then opens up the case again (and why?)...
Because new email came to light through the Weiner investigation.

[/quote]...drops it right before Election Day, "clearing" Hillary again.[/quote]
His team reviewed the evidence - the vast majority of the email was duplicate - and was able to determine that there was nothing incriminating in the new emails discovered.

Good riddance.
Not a big fan of Comey myself, but he is credible.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah, but what are the odds that he will actually testify under oath?
I think they are exceptionally low that he will voluntarily testify under oath. Again, I will believe his promises for transparency when he actually starts following through with them, like releasing his taxes.
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I've been amused by how both sides have cherry picked the testimony to suit their sides. It's hilarious that when Comey's testimony serves their side it might as well be the gospel and then he is a tool that can't be trusted when he made statements that didn't serve a particular side. Probably means you are doing what you are supposed to when both sides hate you.

Like those here (Carpro especially) who has been staying for weeks that the investigation "never ended" is right here to post the article saying that Trump was never under investigation.
 
Top