• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Trump working to flip the 9th Circuit

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think the 9th Circuit has been demonstrating that under a strong majority of Progressives that they will abuse their power to further their political agendas. A stronger Conservative presence will help keep this in check whereas a Conservative majority would bring the court back into upholding the Constitution and away from legislating from the bench rather than flip the abuses of Left over to the Right therein doing the same thing in reverse. But, yes, putting the 9th Circuit's focus back on their true responsibilities would be a huge hit on the Progressive's war machine.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
While it's true that it turns out the Ninth Circuit being liberal is a working out of the checks and balance venue I'll be glad to see it get flipped.

The Liberals have a similar distressing view of the SCOTUS leaning conservative, too bad :).
OH MY what will they do when President Trump has to replace the retiring Justice Ginsburg!?

Mass hysteria.

Imagine this : 2020

President Trump reelected.
Republican Congress.
Republican Senate.
Amy Barrett to replace Justice Ginsburg.
Ninth Circuit flipped.

:eek::eek::eek:
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
I still think the Ninth should be broken up, it's just too large. I have heard that Trump is shifting it to the right, which really isn't hard to do, all the court has to do is to move at all. There was a good ruling by them today:

Abortion clinic referral restrictions can take effect, 9th Circuit rules - CNNPolitics

but it's a lottery. Two of those judges were appointed by Bush, the other one by Reagan.
From the decision:
The harms that Plaintiffs would likely suffer if a stay is granted are comparatively minor. The main potential harms that Plaintiffs identify are based on their prediction that implementation of the Final Rule will cause an immediate and steep decline in the number of Title X providers. But these potential harms obviously rely on crediting Plaintiffs’ predictions about the effect of implementing the Final Rule, over HHS’s predictions that implementation of the final rule will have the opposite effect.
http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/06/20/document.pdf
Other than that they are in the “family planning” business mainly for the money to be made murdering babies in the womb, is there a reason that there would be a sudden drop in provider participation under the Final Rule?

It is strikingly clear that this is a battle between good and evil. I am heartened by their decision, temporary though it is.
 
Top