To make it clear, I did not say that criminals are not to be held accountable, they are in fact to be dealt with according to man's law. Even if they couldn't help acting out their crimes, it doesn't free them from the rest of society needing to be protected from them.
Looking at a drug addict, which has come to the Lord, but because of physical perversions from his prior addiction, he goes back into his sin. where is the responsiblity for this sin since it is a form of "sickness" out of the control of the individual?
He was forgiven for the "initial" act of taking drugs at the time of his conversion. But because of the initial act of "getting hooked on drugs", he was weakend by that act physically, mentally and chemically. The initial acts left him scared for life with a weakness for taking drugs. That weakness was a physical pervertion created by the sin which has now been forgiven. How can he now be held accountable for this new sin which is only cause directly from the old sin which was forgiven?
And please don't sidetrack this by thinking this applies to ALL addicts, I know it doesn't. But there are many who with God's help will stay off drugs, but there are also many that can't stay off dispite their really wanting to. If they have a perversion of their mind or chemical makeup, does that make them destined for Hell? I don't believe so. If that were so, then it would be God's fault that he did not restore the addict to full health upon conversion, thus making it God's fault for the addicts continued sinning ways. And that isn't the way it works.
Therefore, there can be criminals that are guilty of crimes from Man's view and that can certainly be sin's from the Bible's view, but which are not held against them from God's view.
[ October 28, 2002, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: post-it ]
Looking at a drug addict, which has come to the Lord, but because of physical perversions from his prior addiction, he goes back into his sin. where is the responsiblity for this sin since it is a form of "sickness" out of the control of the individual?
He was forgiven for the "initial" act of taking drugs at the time of his conversion. But because of the initial act of "getting hooked on drugs", he was weakend by that act physically, mentally and chemically. The initial acts left him scared for life with a weakness for taking drugs. That weakness was a physical pervertion created by the sin which has now been forgiven. How can he now be held accountable for this new sin which is only cause directly from the old sin which was forgiven?
And please don't sidetrack this by thinking this applies to ALL addicts, I know it doesn't. But there are many who with God's help will stay off drugs, but there are also many that can't stay off dispite their really wanting to. If they have a perversion of their mind or chemical makeup, does that make them destined for Hell? I don't believe so. If that were so, then it would be God's fault that he did not restore the addict to full health upon conversion, thus making it God's fault for the addicts continued sinning ways. And that isn't the way it works.
Therefore, there can be criminals that are guilty of crimes from Man's view and that can certainly be sin's from the Bible's view, but which are not held against them from God's view.
[ October 28, 2002, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: post-it ]