• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

TV Star Turned Baptist Minister

Alive in Christ

New Member
Arbo...

2. Why the push to impose acceptance by those of us who believe women are Biblically prohibited from holding a pastorate?

1st...because this is a "debate" forum, and so, we get to do that.

And 2ndly...because we believe that Gods scriptures prove our side to be correct, and the other side in great error.



If you disagree, go to a church more in line with your views.

We dont want to. Without bringing these issues up, how can scriptural change occur? If we flee, the erronious practices will never be replaced with truth.

Arent you glad that those opposing slavery in the USA didnt just disapear, but rather kept the pressure on for positive change? :wavey:

I know I am.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alive in Christ

New Member
Arbo...

Based on what Scripture specifically? Chapter and verse, if you please.

This is a great start...


We can summarize the Apostle’s position regarding women as follows: First, men and women are created equally in the image and glory of God, and participate equally in the grace of redemption. Second, marriage relationships are not to be ordered according to an externally imposed hierarchy “according to the law,” but by an internally embraced expression of self-giving love through mutual submission. Third, women have just as much right as men to exercise their spiritual gifts in the Church and fulfill their ministry, especially if they are called to preach. The wholeness and the health of the Church depends upon the freedom of each individual to exercise his or her spiritual gift and calling to the fullest.

All that we have seen thus far leads us to affirm that Paul’s attitude toward women is best set forward in his strong Declaration of Spiritual Emancipation: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. . . . It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery” (Gal. 3:28; 5:1).

And here is much more scripture for you... (Its quite long)

http://www.ccel.us/place.praise.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
Arbo...



This is a great start...




And here is much more scripture for you... (Its quite long)

http://www.ccel.us/place.praise.html

I was rather hoping for a reference from Scripture that speaks directly to the issue rather than a link and a quote of a commentator.

Does anyone have Scripture, for it is (or should be) what our faith is based on, that directly and expressly approves of female pastors? I have found none, and so far none have been given by those who contend it does.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alive in Christ

New Member
Arbo...

I was rather hoping for a reference from Scripture that speaks directly to the issue rather than a link and a quote of a commentator.

Does anyone have Scripture, for it is (or should be) what our faith is based on, that directly and expressly approves of female pastors? I have found none, and so far none have been given by those who contend it does.

This is very interesting to me.

You ask for scripture.

I give you an article that was published by Christianity Today magazine, and it is dripping with scripture in support of mine, and others viewpoint regarding women in leadership.

...and you return without haveing read it all (nobody could read it thoughtfully in that amount of time) declaring that its unsastisfactory because it hs some commentary.

C'mon brother..man up.

I think the you are just wooried about what you might find in that material, and you dont want to have to deal with a well done artical (with scriptural support} advocating women in leadership, that you will have to deal with.

The truth is not going anywhere. Its not going away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Arbo...



This is a great start...




And here is much more scripture for you... (Its quite long)

http://www.ccel.us/place.praise.html

AIC....
here is some info on this author;
It is popular on NazNet, particularly by site overseers, to support a Bible not fully reliable.


NazNet basically claims the Word of God is errant. That is, it has errors in it.


Therefore, one is left to pick and choose what is error and what is not error. Imagine the hubris of the mortal, especially in deciphering the divine revelation.


NazNet Manager G. R. ‘Scott’ Cundiff supports the errant position of Dr. C.S. Cowles of Point Loma Nazarene University. Cowles puts forth his thesis here: http://www.naznet.com/inerrant.htm


Cowles’ presentation is entitled: “Scriptural Inerrancy? ‘Behold, I Show You A More Excellent Way’: An Open Letter by C. S. Cowles / Spring, 2009 Point Loma Nazarene University.”


NazNet Moderator Hans Deventer echoes Cundiff’s praise for Cowles’ lecture that the Scriptures have errors in them. Hans says regarding Cundiff’s writing: “I have only one comment: WOW! Thank you, Dr. Cowles. This is a keeper.”


There can be no doubt that NazNet fosters biblical errancy. There is no doubt that NazNet encourages theological liberalism.

Here is a reply to this wrong article;
http://www.ondoctrine.com/2cow0001.htm


This heretic does not believe the bible is inerrant.....another who rejects the historic teaching of the historic church.....not a good source AIC.

read here;
http://www.pointloma.edu/sites/default/files/filemanager/Wesleyan_Center/excellent-way.pdf
 

Michael Wrenn

New Member
Erronious practices that have been around for centuries? Was the Church wrong all this time?



This issue is hardly comparable to slavery.

The ancient Celtic Church, which developed apart from the patriarchal, paternalistic teaching and influence of the RCC and other Catholicism for centuries, included women in positions of leadership from the beginning. Why? Because they were closer to what the scriptures actually taught and meant in context.
 

Arbo

Active Member
Site Supporter
The ancient Celtic Church, which developed apart from the patriarchal, paternalistic teaching and influence of the RCC and other Catholicism for centuries, included women in positions of leadership from the beginning. Why? Because they were closer to what the scriptures actually taught and meant in context.

Never heard of the Celtic Church.

If you subscribe to that belief you have the freedom to go there.

I'll ask you the same question posed in an earlier post: Does anyone have Scripture, for it is (or should be) what our faith is based on, that directly and expressly approves of female pastors? I have found none, and so far none have been given by those who contend it does.

I'm not interested in links or articles from magazines. Book, chapter, and verse from Scripture which contradicts the requirement that a pastor must be the husband of one wife is what I'm asking for.

I believe at this point no such passage exists.
 

revmwc

Well-Known Member
Revmwc

Here is some excellant material for you.

Here is part, with a link to the entirety....




http://www.ccel.us/place.praise.html

So back to my original question when you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alive in Christ
"No, I see any women who are good, qualified teachers of the scriptures, being fully able to teach ANYONE the truthes of Gods scriptures.

Kids, teens, women and men.

I, a man, have been blessed abundantly listening to the excllent teaching of women like Kay Arthur, Beth Moore and others.

There is abundant evidence in the scriptures to support women teaching men.

The "problem" here is not with the women teachers, and pastors.

The "problem" is clearly with the men. "

When a "good, qualified women teachers of the scriptures" come to this verse how would they teach that scripture doesn't clearly state a woman is not to teach a man nor usurp mans authority. How would she teach the truth there based on what the original language Paul through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit wrote? Based on the culture of the people at Ephesus who worship Goddess and had female priest (priestess) as their culture. This would have been out of their normal worship practices, but throughtout Asia Minor in Macedonia and even Rome the practice was quite acceptable to have women as Priest especially at temples of Dinah.

Here it is in several versions with the text including the new living:


1 Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

NIV
12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.

American standard
12 But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness.
13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not beguiled, but the woman being beguiled hath fallen into transgression

NLT

12 I do not let women teach men or have authority over them. Let them listen quietly.
13 For God made Adam first, and afterward he made Eve.
14 And it was not Adam who was deceived by Satan. The woman was deceived, and sin was the result.

Then the Greek words for:
Suffer = Epitrepo
to turn to, transfer, commit, instruct, to permit, allow, give leave
Not = Ou
no, not; in direct questions expecting an affirmative answer
Woman = Gune
a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or married, or a widow
a wife, of a betrothed woman
Teach = Didasko
to teach, to hold discourse with others in order to instruct them, deliver didactic discourses, to be a teacher, to discharge the office of a teacher, conduct one's self as a teacher, to teach one, to impart instruction, instill doctrine into one, the thing taught or enjoined, to explain or expound a thing
to teach one something,

He continues nor to usurp or snatch the:
Authority = Authenteo
one who with his own hands kills another or himself, one who acts on his own authority, autocratic, an absolute master, to govern, exercise dominion over one

and it continues "over the man", so how would a woman who is a "good, qualified women teachers of the scriptures" expound this and still show she is qualified to teach, to have Authenteo over, to pastor a man?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DaChaser1

New Member
AIC....
here is some info on this author;
It is popular on NazNet, particularly by site overseers, to support a Bible not fully reliable.


NazNet basically claims the Word of God is errant. That is, it has errors in it.


Therefore, one is left to pick and choose what is error and what is not error. Imagine the hubris of the mortal, especially in deciphering the divine revelation.


NazNet Manager G. R. ‘Scott’ Cundiff supports the errant position of Dr. C.S. Cowles of Point Loma Nazarene University. Cowles puts forth his thesis here: http://www.naznet.com/inerrant.htm


Cowles’ presentation is entitled: “Scriptural Inerrancy? ‘Behold, I Show You A More Excellent Way’: An Open Letter by C. S. Cowles / Spring, 2009 Point Loma Nazarene University.”


NazNet Moderator Hans Deventer echoes Cundiff’s praise for Cowles’ lecture that the Scriptures have errors in them. Hans says regarding Cundiff’s writing: “I have only one comment: WOW! Thank you, Dr. Cowles. This is a keeper.”


There can be no doubt that NazNet fosters biblical errancy. There is no doubt that NazNet encourages theological liberalism.

Here is a reply to this wrong article;
http://www.ondoctrine.com/2cow0001.htm


This heretic does not believe the bible is inerrant.....another who rejects the historic teaching of the historic church.....not a good source AIC.

read here;
http://www.pointloma.edu/sites/default/files/filemanager/Wesleyan_Center/excellent-way.pdf


Basically...

Whenever the Bible agrees with their positions, its trustworthy and fully infallible, but when it clashes with current comtemporat thought...

they know better/more than the Apostles, based upon current understanding, and seek to bring it "up to date!"
 

DaChaser1

New Member
So back to my original question when you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alive in Christ
"No, I see any women who are good, qualified teachers of the scriptures, being fully able to teach ANYONE the truthes of Gods scriptures.

Kids, teens, women and men.

I, a man, have been blessed abundantly listening to the excllent teaching of women like Kay Arthur, Beth Moore and others.

There is abundant evidence in the scriptures to support women teaching men.

The "problem" here is not with the women teachers, and pastors.

The "problem" is clearly with the men. "

When a "good, qualified women teachers of the scriptures" come to this verse how would they teach that scripture doesn't clearly state a woman is not to teach a man nor usurp mans authority. How would she teach the truth there based on what the original language Paul through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit wrote? Based on the culture of the people at Ephesus who worship Goddess and had female priest (priestess) as their culture. This would have been out of their normal worship practices, but throughtout Asia Minor in Macedonia and even Rome the practice was quite acceptable to have women as Priest especially at temples of Dinah.

Here it is in several versions with the text including the new living:


1 Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

NIV
12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.

American standard
12 But I permit not a woman to teach, nor to have dominion over a man, but to be in quietness.
13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not beguiled, but the woman being beguiled hath fallen into transgression

NLT

12 I do not let women teach men or have authority over them. Let them listen quietly.
13 For God made Adam first, and afterward he made Eve.
14 And it was not Adam who was deceived by Satan. The woman was deceived, and sin was the result.

Then the Greek words for:
Suffer = Epitrepo
to turn to, transfer, commit, instruct, to permit, allow, give leave
Not = Ou
no, not; in direct questions expecting an affirmative answer
Woman = Gune
a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or married, or a widow
a wife, of a betrothed woman
Teach = Didasko
to teach, to hold discourse with others in order to instruct them, deliver didactic discourses, to be a teacher, to discharge the office of a teacher, conduct one's self as a teacher, to teach one, to impart instruction, instill doctrine into one, the thing taught or enjoined, to explain or expound a thing
to teach one something,

He continues nor to usurp or snatch the:
Authority = Authenteo
one who with his own hands kills another or himself, one who acts on his own authority, autocratic, an absolute master, to govern, exercise dominion over one

and it continues "over the man", so how would a woman who is a "good, qualified women teachers of the scriptures" expound this and still show she is qualified to teach, to have Authenteo over, to pastor a man?


Think that Paul was referring to the bibical doctrine of the positions of spiritual authority residing within local churches were to be filled by godly men, as they would be His represenantives to the assembly, would be accountible to God for how church was allowed to be run!
 

revmwc

Well-Known Member
Think that Paul was referring to the bibical doctrine of the positions of spiritual authority residing within local churches were to be filled by godly men, as they would be His represenantives to the assembly, would be accountible to God for how church was allowed to be run!

Well that is how I see this passage too but I was asking those who say this passage doesn't mean that.
 

DaChaser1

New Member
Never heard of the Celtic Church.

If you subscribe to that belief you have the freedom to go there.

I'll ask you the same question posed in an earlier post: Does anyone have Scripture, for it is (or should be) what our faith is based on, that directly and expressly approves of female pastors? I have found none, and so far none have been given by those who contend it does.

I'm not interested in links or articles from magazines. Book, chapter, and verse from Scripture which contradicts the requirement that a pastor must be the husband of one wife is what I'm asking for.

I believe at this point no such passage exists.

You would be correct!

ONLY way is to "read back into" what somw think it SHOULD has said, not WHAT it said!
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You're getting all that from this verse?

Young's Literal Translation:
and a woman I do not suffer to teach, nor to rule a husband, but to be in quietness

Really?
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Is SBC President Bryant Wright a 'theological liberal', 'leftist', ''someone whose church you should march out of', etc.? [His church has an adult coed Sunday School class taught by a [gasp!] woman]
 

Michael Wrenn

New Member
Never heard of the Celtic Church.

If you subscribe to that belief you have the freedom to go there.

I'll ask you the same question posed in an earlier post: Does anyone have Scripture, for it is (or should be) what our faith is based on, that directly and expressly approves of female pastors? I have found none, and so far none have been given by those who contend it does.

I'm not interested in links or articles from magazines. Book, chapter, and verse from Scripture which contradicts the requirement that a pastor must be the husband of one wife is what I'm asking for.

I believe at this point no such passage exists.

As has been stated, you have been given articles and scriptures; you don't want to accept the meaning of those scriptures as they were originally written, in context.
 
Top