• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Twitter Finally Reins Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
Anyone in doubt that these rules are directed at President Trump?

Can’t wait to see the firestorm when any of his tweets are censored

Our highest priority is to protect the health of the public conversation on Twitter, and an important part of that is ensuring our rules and how we enforce them are easy to understand. In the past, we’ve allowed certain Tweets that violated our rules to remain on Twitter because they were in the public’s interest, but it wasn’t clear when and how we made those determinations. To fix that, we’re introducing a new notice that will provide additional clarity in these situations, and sharing more on when and why we’ll use it.

Serving the public conversation includes providing the ability for anyone to talk about what matters to them; this can be especially important when engaging with government officials and political figures. By nature of their positions these leaders have outsized influence and sometimes say things that could be considered controversial or invite debate and discussion. A critical function of our service is providing a place where people can openly and publicly respond to their leaders and hold them accountable.

With this in mind, there are certain cases where it may be in the public’s interest to have access to certain Tweets, even if they would otherwise be in violation of our rules. On the rare occasions when this happens, we'll place a notice – a screen you have to click or tap through before you see the Tweet – to provide additional context and clarity. We’ll also take steps to make sure the Tweet is not algorithmically elevated on our service, to strike the right balance between enabling free expression, fostering accountability, and reducing the potential harm caused by these Tweets.

Who does this apply to?

We will only consider applying this notice on Tweets from accounts that meet the following criteria. The account must:

  • Be or represent a government official, be running for public office, or be considered for a government position (i.e., next in line, awaiting confirmation, named successor to an appointed position);
  • Have more than 100,000 followers; and
  • Be verified.
That said, there are cases, such as direct threats of violence or calls to commit violence against an individual, that are unlikely to be considered in the public interest.

What will the notice look like?

The notice will be immediately visible in your home timeline and across other areas like search.

publicnotice.png.img.fullhd.medium.png

How will we decide when to use this notice?

A cross-functional team including Trust and Safety, Legal, Public Policy and regional teams will determine if the Tweets are a matter of public interest based on the criteria listed above and the following considerations:

  • The immediacy and severity of potential harm from the rule violation, with an emphasis on ensuring physical safety;
  • Whether preserving a Tweet will allow others to hold the government official, candidate for public office, or appointee accountable for their statements;
  • Whether there are other sources of information about this statement available for the public to stay informed;
  • If removal would inadvertently hide context or prevent people from understanding an issue of public concern; and
  • If the Tweet provides a unique context or perspective not available elsewhere that is necessary to a broader discussion.
In instances where a Tweet violates our rules and our review doesn’t find that it would be in the public interest to leave it up, we will require the account owner to remove the Tweet. Either way, this notice will make our decision-making clearer.

What happens to the Tweet that gets this notice placed on it?

When a Tweet has this notice placed on it, it will feature less prominently on Twitter, and not appear in:

  • Safe search
  • Timeline when switched to Top Tweets
  • Live events pages
  • Recommended Tweet push notifications
  • Notifications tab
  • Explore
This notice won’t be applied to any Tweets sent before today and, given the conditions outlined above, it’s unlikely you'll encounter it often. We cannot predict the first time it will be used, but we wanted to give you more information about this new notice before you come across it on Twitter.

Over time, public interest and how it’s defined on Twitter may change as we observe different types of behavior. We’ll continue to evaluate how our rules and enforcement actions can be clearer and keep working to make our decision-making easier to understand
.


Defining public interest on Twitter
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, Twitter was fun while it lasted.

If they do this and it becomes intrusive, it's the end of Twitter.

Can’t wait to see the firestorm when any of his tweets are censored

People will leave Twitter in droves. Not just conservatives but liberals that believe in free speech. Yes, I understand Twitter is a corporation and it's not technically free speech to post Tweets. However, if they start putting disclaimers on people's posts it will be the death of Twitter. Tweet volume will drop like a lead balloon and so will ad revenues.

Twitter needs to stop pretending it's in the public interest. It's a for-profit enterprise that I view as being entertainment, and I bet most other people see it as entertainment.

This new policy is insanely dumb.
 
Last edited:

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
This new policy is insanely dumb.

They are in a fix, doomed if they do, damned if they don’t. Free speech has limits. There are no checks whatsoever in Gab and it’s full of garbage.

What I’m certain is, any censored tweet will be greatly debated over. What would you suggest they handled fake news, terrorism and hatred?
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They are in a fix, doomed if they do, damned if they don’t. Free speech has limits. There are no checks whatsoever in Gab and it’s full of garbage.

What I’m certain is, any censored tweet will be greatly debated over. What would you suggest they handled fake news, terrorism and hatred?

How should they handle it? Do nothing. Let almost everything be posted, except for clearly illegal things. People can figure this stuff out without someone policing them.

They could also have a very strongly worded warning when you sign up for Twitter that it may contain offensive content. If you don't acknowledge, you don't get in. They could retroactively require current users to opt-in again.
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
They are in a fix, doomed if they do, damned if they don’t. Free speech has limits. There are no checks whatsoever in Gab and it’s full of garbage.

What I’m certain is, any censored tweet will be greatly debated over. What would you suggest they handled fake news, terrorism and hatred?
Why do anything about it, at all? Free speech is free speech, especially the speech that others find offensive or false. The whole point behind freedom of speech is that even offensive speech is included. The whole problem with the Left is that they want to censor what they disagree with. They want to silence people on Twitter, YouTube, and FB. That is precisely what makes the Left so unamerican.

The Left is all about what they can take away from you, what they can ban. They want to take away meat, airplanes, cows, fossil fuel, soda, plastic straws, private health insurance, they want to ban certain books and songs and statues and even ban God from the public square. Their whole tack is: "If I don't like it, you are not allowed to enjoy it."

Free speech has limits, but the Left thinks that those limits pertain to what they find offensive, or what is not politically correct.

The limits of free speech pertain to threats against others' lives, family, property, as well as slander and libel.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
Why do anything about it, at all? Free speech is free speech, especially the speech that others find offensive or false. The whole point behind freedom of speech is that even offensive speech is included. The whole problem with the Left is that they want to censor what they disagree with. They want to silence people on Twitter, YouTube, and FB. That is precisely what makes the Left so unamerican.

The Left is all about what they can take away from you, what they can ban. They want to take away meat, airplanes, cows, fossil fuel, soda, plastic straws, private health insurance, they want to ban certain books and songs and statues and even ban God from the public square. Their whole tack is: "If I don't like it, you are not allowed to enjoy it."

Free speech has limits, but the Left thinks that those limits pertain to what they find offensive, or what is not politically correct.

The limits of free speech pertain to threats against others' lives, family, property, as well as slander and libel.

I was labeled anti-Semite and warned that such has no place in a ‘Christian board’ such as this. Clearly ‘free speech’ simply means right to offend without taking offense lol.

Have you seen how much hate Ilhan Omar receive from the Right for criticizing Israel?

There’s is nothing like free speech in this world,and it’s extremely delusional demanding ‘free speech’ from a private company when it exists nowhere else. Twitter is hard on hateful right and left. It’s a level playing field. Only hypocrites and those devoid of intellect would whine when their hate is not accommodated.
 
Last edited:

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
I was labeled anti-Semite and warned that such has no place in a ‘Christian board’ such as this. Clearly ‘free speech’ simply means right to offend without taking offense lol.
No, it doesn't. Free speech doesn't mean that we silence what we don't like.

There’s is nothing like free speech in this world,and it’s extremely delusional demanding ‘free speech’ from a private company when it exists nowhere else.
The problem is when said company is promoting itself as promoting free speech and free exchange of ideas in the public arena, all the while limiting what they don't like or what they don't agree with, such as in the case of shadow banning.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
No, it doesn't. Free speech doesn't mean that we silence what we don't like.


The problem is when said company is promoting itself as promoting free speech and free exchange of ideas in the public arena, all the while limiting what they don't like or what they don't agree with, such as in the case of shadow banning.

Free speech is not absolute. If you want that go to Gab. Twitter is more civilized. They don’t ban what they don’t like, but what is wrong( illegal,false,discriminatory etc)

I wonder what kind of Christians are unsettled by Twitter’s very open policy. What content do you wish to be on Twitter that you can’t put there?

Give me practical examples
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
Free speech is not absolute. If you want that go to Gab. Twitter is more civilized. They don’t ban what they don’t like, but what is wrong( illegal,false,discriminatory etc)
No one is saying that free speech is absolute. The problem is that the Left doesn't like free speech and wants to control speech and when the given the chance to either promote ideas they don't like or ban those ideas, they ban them.

I wonder what kind of Christians are unsettled by Twitter’s very open policy. What content do you wish to be on Twitter that you can’t put there?

Give me practical examples
I am not on Twitter, but I have seen it reported in the news more than once that they shadow ban the content of conservatives on a pretty regular basis. So, it's not the case that there is information that you cannot put on there; rather, it is the case that there is information you put on there, but is shadow banned so that no one can see it.
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
Have you seen how much hate Ilhan Omar receive from the Right for criticizing Israel?
She has gotten a lot of blowback and she deserves it. Free speech is a two-way street. Omar can hate on Israel all she wants and we can respond with the fact that she is promoting anti-Semitism.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
She has gotten a lot of blowback and she deserves it. Free speech is a two-way street. Omar can hate on Israel all she wants and we can respond with the fact that she is promoting anti-Semitism.

Bigots and racists even question her Americanness. They never respond to the substantive points she raised but on her gender, race etc.

Bullies are the most empty headed but I digress
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
I am not on Twitter, but I have seen it reported in the news more than once that they shadow ban the content of conservatives on a pretty regular basis. So, it's not the case that there is information that you cannot put on there; rather, it is the case that there is information you put on there, but is shadow banned so that no one can see it.

You rely on others to rate Twitter for you? That's a rabbit hole. You open yourself up to conspiracy theories. I can almost bet the same gang who whine about 'shadow ban' believe Obama was born in Kenya and he is Muslim.
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
Bigots and racists even question her Americanness. They never respond to the substantive points she raised but on her gender, race etc.

Bullies are the most empty headed but I digress
She doesn't make any substantive points. She reflects the anti-Semitic notions of her Islamic religion.
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
You rely on others to rate Twitter for you? That's a rabbit hole. You open yourself up to conspiracy theories. I can almost bet the same gang who whine about 'shadow ban' believe Obama was born in Kenya and he is Muslim.
I don't depend on anyone to rate Twitter for me. I am simply stating what has been in teh mainstream news cycles. And while Twitter and Google and FB all claim to promote free speech, they don't and everyone knows that they don't. And when they are caught, every time they are caught, they claim it was a "glitch." It's interesting that those "glitches" only seem to affect conservatives and conservative sites.

It's not a conspiracy theory at all.
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
She doesn't make any substantive points. She reflects the anti-Semitic notions of her Islamic religion.
It's not a slur when it is true. She is anti-Semitic and every single one of her tweets about Israel have been racist/anti-Semitic to the core. They reflect, some cases, centuries' old libels about Israel that are simply not true but are promoted by Islam.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
I don't depend on anyone to rate Twitter for me. I am simply stating what has been in teh mainstream news cycles. And while Twitter and Google and FB all claim to promote free speech, they don't and everyone knows that they don't. And when they are caught, every time they are caught, they claim it was a "glitch." It's interesting that those "glitches" only seem to affect conservatives and conservative sites.

It's not a conspiracy theory at all.

If you are not on the platform then all you know about it is fed on you. They digest their experiences for you, concoct all sorts of theories and they have a ready audienta in your ilk.

I asked for a practical example and you lacked any.

Twitter is fair to all sides; right,ccenter,left. But it's never fair for hateful bigots and anyone indulging in what I shared. Ever read Twitter policy?
 

GoodTidings

Well-Known Member
Bigots and racists even question her Americanness. They never respond to the substantive points she raised but on her gender, race etc.

Bullies are the most empty headed but I digress
She is anti-American. It is not racist to say so because being anti-American is not a racial issue; it's a worldview issue and she comes from an Islamic worldview that hates both the US and Israel with near equal passion.
 

Agent47

Active Member
Site Supporter
It's not a slur when it is true. She is anti-Semitic and every single one of her tweets about Israel have been racist/anti-Semitic to the core. They reflect, some cases, centuries' old libels about Israel that are simply not true but are promoted by Islam.

Just as pro-Israeli policies are promoted by Jewish lobbies the likes of AIPAC.

Ilhan Omar is a fine young and intelligent nd lea judging by the hate she receives. It's always about her faith, gender,descent,age but never her points.

Nobody is dumb enough to challenge facts
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top