The real reason for the Russian invasion isn't neo-nazis, it's resources.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ukraine Sits On Raw Materials Worth Trillions
- Thread starter Squire Robertsson
- Start date
That's what the USA and world billionaires wants to get their hands on. That why they wanted NATO to turn Ukraine into one of them, so US and EU billionaires could make the profits off these sources. Now you understand why we against all logic wanted them to join NATO, pushing for war. They want to reap the rewards, and war doesn't bother them. They will make trillions off of the war. USA tax payers pay for the trillions in air craft and weapon systems. The huge super companies make huge profits. Politicians get their huge chunks of cash and favors. And we get the shaft. Where is my profits as a tax payer who financed all these weapons of war? Why do they get all the profits when all they did was pay bribes? Quit using our tax money to make billionaires even richer. Let them invest their money into the weapon systems and sell/use them. Quit using tax payer money to finance these things.
Conan, it's not so much western oligarchs that want to control Ukraine's resources as it is the Kremlin's.
Konstantin
Member
The United States is not ruled by Forbes billionaires. The owners of money are in the shadows. They are no longer interested in profits. They print money in the right quantities. They are interested in unlimited power over the whole world. Russia is an obstacle on the way to this absolute power. Nazified and militarized Ukraine was to become a battering ram against Russia. Therefore, for the last 8 years, the owners of money have been "pumping up" Ukraine with weapons and brainwashing Ukrainians with Bandera ideology.
The Bible says that the owners of money will be defeated in this war against Russia.
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
If I stated you have really drank the Putin cool-aid, would you know what I meant?
peace to you
Konstantin
Member
If I stated you have really drank nothing, would you know what I meant? )))
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
Well, it sure is not the Kremlins oligarchs that want to take away the right to keep and bare arms is it? Its not the kremlins O's that control msnbc, cnn, abc and all of the major news media. It's not the O's that is bringing CRT to you. I could go on and on. You have seen what they have done before our very faces. I wish were were the good guys and believed it all my life until now. Why did the cia experiment on Americans with LSD seeing if he could make them go insane without them knowing it? Ted lezenski was one of the victims of that program. Look how that worked out for us? The only reason we know about it is through the freedom of information act, after all those who did it are long dead and can't be held accountable, but were protected. Why won't they release the warren commission's reports on Kennedy's assassination? Why was the former head of the cia put on the commission when Kennedy had fired him?
Sorry for rambling. I'll stop now.
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
Just so you know, the phrase “drinking the cool-aid” comes from an atrocity in South America about 1979 or so.
A maniac preacher named Jim Jones, took a congregation to Ghana, I think, and persuaded over 900 men, women and children to drink poisoned cool-aid.
They followed the man so blindly, they couldn’t see the truth of who he was. It cost them their lives.
I’m sure there is a lot of regional politics in this conflict that I am unaware of, but you are obviously pushing pro Russian propaganda throughout.
You are probably a Russian patriot. Sometimes blind loyalty leaves you… well… blind to the truth.
peace to you
As a San Franciscan, I remember Jim Jones and his People's Temple. My congressman at the time Leo Ryan was killed and my current Jackie Spiers then his aide was wounded.
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
Well, I knew a congressman had been killed, but I’m glad the aide, Jackie Speirs survived and has continued to serve in that district. That is remarkable.
Hard to believe that was more than 40 years ago. I was in high school.
Thanks for the info
peace to you
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
What I remember was several international agencies “verified” what Saddam Hussain, himself, was claiming; ie that he had WMD’s and would use them if invaded.
I remember Colin Powell, the SOS under bush was opposed to the invasion but made a strong case before the UN for the existence of WMD in Iraq.
Peace to you
That whole fiasco was a blunder from the git-go AFAIC. That butcher had plenty of warning that “W” was coming for the WMDs, so he had plenty of time to relocate them - if in reality they existed - or just sit tight if he (Sadam) had been lying about having them.
May have been a bluff all the time, but if so it sure backfired on him!
May have been a bluff all the time, but if so it sure backfired on him!
canadyjd
Well-Known Member
I remember Libya (I think) admitting to the UN they had WMD buried in the sand, just after Saddam was killed. So, I guess some WMD was destroyed after all. Whether or not it came from Iraq, I dint know, but I don’t think any agency thought Libya had WMD before that.That whole fiasco was a blunder from the git-go AFAIC. That butcher had plenty of warning that “W” was coming for the WMDs, so he had plenty of time to relocate them - if in reality they existed - or just sit tight if he (Sadam) had been lying about having them.
May have been a bluff all the time, but if so it sure backfired on him!
peace to you
Bless you! Remember, W himself said he was wrong about Sudam having WMD. He didn't have them.That whole fiasco was a blunder from the git-go AFAIC. That butcher had plenty of warning that “W” was coming for the WMDs, so he had plenty of time to relocate them - if in reality they existed - or just sit tight if he (Sadam) had been lying about having them.
May have been a bluff all the time, but if so it sure backfired on him!
I take note that he used no weapons of mass destruction against us or his people, but was run down like a dog and shot. Maybe, just maybe they said that to justify taking him out.
I know, I was trained as a kid to not like him. To see him as the enemy. But did we take him out because he wouldn't do business with our billionairs?
Bless you canadyjd!