1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Unanswered Q's from KJBOism

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by DesiderioDomini, May 9, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 5 of 5
  1. standingfirminChrist

    standingfirminChrist New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    It is only the devil who questions the Word of God...

    Yea, and hath God said...?
     
    #81 standingfirminChrist, May 10, 2006
  2. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is not wrong , but God-honoring to have competent scholars ( I'm not one ) question the legitimacy of a particular rendering in any version of the Bible . BTW, I am talking about academics who are ardent believers -- lower critics , not from the higher , destructive school .
     
    #82 Rippon, May 10, 2006
  3. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Standingfirm,

    Is it wrong to add to the word of God, YES OR NO?
     
    #83 DesiderioDomini, May 10, 2006
  4. Soulman

    Soulman New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe to intentionally add or take away from God's word is wrong. However when translating the bible took place, preserving the meaning of the text from one language to another at times must have been a real challenge.
     
    #84 Soulman, May 10, 2006
  5. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Many times it is not possible to have a one-to-one correspondence between languages . Phrase by phrase may sometimes be better than word-for-word .
     
    #85 Rippon, May 10, 2006
  6. DesiderioDomini

    DesiderioDomini New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand this, however, this reading found in Revelation 17:8 does not exist anywhere on the planet.

    I want standingfirm to explain why he feels the KJV is correct when this reading NEVER EXISTED before it was introduced into Erasmus' text due to a TYPO in 1516. The KJV unknowingly brought this error into its text.

    Now, this is FACT. I ask that if you disagree, then prove it. However, I think it is clear that your claim of KJVO will die here. I am not attacking God's word, but rather the addition to it by the KJV translators.
     
    #86 DesiderioDomini, May 10, 2006
  7. Keith M

    Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yet you question and belittle the word of God as long as it is in any version other than the KJV.

    Yea, and hath God said that there is only one valid English Bible version? (The answer is NO.)
     
    #87 Keith M, May 10, 2006
  8. Keith M

    Keith M New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    1
    If there are those who do not want to see this proof, then they should leave this discussion alone. You have been asked repeatedly to show this alleged proof yet you fall back on feeble excuses why you cannot produce this proof. You cannot produce this alleged proof because it does not exist. This proof is to be found nowhere in the word of God - it is merely in the words and minds of man.
     
    #88 Keith M, May 10, 2006
  9. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    We are past the five page limit. This thread is accomplishing nothing.

    It is closed and any reopenings will also be closed.
     
    #89 NaasPreacher (C4K), May 10, 2006
Page 5 of 5
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...