Sis. Sarah
New Member
Can't split apples and oranges?
I have been thinking about what both of you have written Bros. David and Mike. And I can't say the Church split because of unbelief because those who have not believed, whether in the first coming of Christ or the second, are just not part of the Church. So this is not the way to say it. Hmm...I mean those who view the Kingdom as a natural, earthly kingdom vs. those who believe it Spiritually yet that Christ reigns over our flesh...I just haven't had the time to talk to the one Elder I know would have been at the association split in West Union but I hope to see him again some day. So in all your years of experience, would you both say that by and large the United, Regular and Primitives have generally regected this doctrine? I have always thought all baptist denominations have but it is very prevalent around here now I would say. I am just surprised that fellowship with a place that teaches this would be acceptable because it is to me more than a difference in custom. I just worry about the children that I know are begged and pushed into being baptized in water at such a place. Do you think it is more dangerous than them not even going anywhere to a real church than to be taken in by this doctrine? It hurts me that the United name would be on such a place but I have learned from my own experience that even while I was in some customary practices from my new birth that God was leading and guiding me through it all. Do you think these children know they are not saved, or can they be so deceived as to believe they are? This worries me more than churches splitting over customs. Well, just more of my thoughts in weariness tonight....God help us and pray for our children always. Some days I am so tired. Good Evening,
I have been thinking about what both of you have written Bros. David and Mike. And I can't say the Church split because of unbelief because those who have not believed, whether in the first coming of Christ or the second, are just not part of the Church. So this is not the way to say it. Hmm...I mean those who view the Kingdom as a natural, earthly kingdom vs. those who believe it Spiritually yet that Christ reigns over our flesh...I just haven't had the time to talk to the one Elder I know would have been at the association split in West Union but I hope to see him again some day. So in all your years of experience, would you both say that by and large the United, Regular and Primitives have generally regected this doctrine? I have always thought all baptist denominations have but it is very prevalent around here now I would say. I am just surprised that fellowship with a place that teaches this would be acceptable because it is to me more than a difference in custom. I just worry about the children that I know are begged and pushed into being baptized in water at such a place. Do you think it is more dangerous than them not even going anywhere to a real church than to be taken in by this doctrine? It hurts me that the United name would be on such a place but I have learned from my own experience that even while I was in some customary practices from my new birth that God was leading and guiding me through it all. Do you think these children know they are not saved, or can they be so deceived as to believe they are? This worries me more than churches splitting over customs. Well, just more of my thoughts in weariness tonight....God help us and pray for our children always. Some days I am so tired. Good Evening,