• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

United We Stand---What happened to that Sentiment?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Read what the founding fathers said. "We will either hang together or we will all hang separately." If you hate the idea of the UNITED Sates of America, what kind of government are you proposing to take its place? A Fascist Dictatorship?

Cops: Men shouted 'Heil Hitler' before firing shot after Spencer speech

Don't try to quote the founding fathers your idea of government is so far from what they created all of your ideology is antithetical to the founding of this country.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
For somebody who thinks he is smarter than most of middle America I would expect more in-depth responses than:
Touché....of course I laugh! After all, contemplating the world today with any insight must convince one that it is absurd. This makes for pure entertainment value.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your basing that on what?
When Democracy breaks down we lose the cherished American history of peaceful transitions between leaders. We're starting to see that happen with Trump. With regard to not following Trump's orders, I believe the chain of command would start to unravel if Trump issued the command to launch nuclear missiles either as a first strike of as a result of his perceived idea that N Korea had fired on us. I consider the current Trump Presidency is in much the same situation as was Richard Nixon's at the height of Watergate.

Debate Over Trump’s Fitness Raises Issue of Checks on Nuclear Power

Debate Over Trump’s Fitness Raises Issue of Checks on Nuclear Power
By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER AUG. 4, 2016

"Then, in 1974, in the last days of the Watergate scandal, Mr. Nixon was drinking heavily and his aides saw what they feared was a growing emotional instability. His new secretary of defense, James R. Schlesinger, himself a hawkish Cold Warrior, instructed the military to divert any emergency orders — especially one involving nuclear weapons — to him or the secretary of state, Henry A. Kissinger.

It was a completely extralegal order, perhaps mutinous. But no one questioned it.

“Although Schlesinger’s order raised questions about who was actually in command,” Eric Schlosser writes in “Command and Control,” a 2013 book, “it seemed like a good idea at the time.”

What would be Trump's authority over the military be if such an incident happened?
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes,but the eventual goal of the left is to make this country and all it's citizens subserviant to a one world government.

Simply put, the left wants to destroy the country, making your point, such as it is, completely moot. If they have their way, the United States of America will cease to exist.

The fight is here and now. The future of your grandchildren is at stake. The real question is , do you want to lay down and let the left roll over you , or not. End of subject.
There is no substance in nor proof of your statements. Arguing for taking down our form of government is clearly treason. Arguing to try to resolve our differences and fix our problems is not. But that can never happen unless we are willing to have constructive meaningful discussions involving everyone.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There is no substance in nor proof of your statements. Arguing for taking down our form of government is clearly treason. Arguing to try to resolve our differences and fix our problems is not. But that can never happen unless we are willing to have constructive meaningful discussions involving everyone.
Are you talking to me?
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The government as originally proposed by the founders. A coalition of sovereign states banded together for the common defense to insure continued liberty. That ended with the Civil War. We need to get back to it. We need to revitalize the 10th amendment.
The Federalist Papers were written to support the ratification of the Constitution, specifically in New York. . They raised a very interesting question:

"It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force.[3]"
Many times America was looked at as an experiment in government by the people. Many that experiment is failing now under the pressures of inequality.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Are you talking to me?
No. Sorry.
Ben Franklin didn't say "We will either hang together or we will all hang separately", what he said was "we must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately".

They must hang together because they needed to form the union, because if they didn't, they would be tried for treason if they failed.
I said exactly the same thing.
We will either hang together or we will all hang separately.
We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.
Please tell me the difference in meaning. OK, I should have looked up the exact quote.
 

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Neither do the right wing Republicans.
These radicals always show up at rallies to support Trump. Who do you think they are marching for. Actually, there're no more radical than many here who call for a violent overthrow of the government through a second civil war.
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. Sorry.

I said exactly the same thing.
We will either hang together or we will all hang separately.
We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.
Please tell me the difference in meaning. OK, I should have looked up the exact quote.

No, you're an engineer, or you were, so I don't see why I have to explain it to you, but your statement was an either/or, Frankiin's was if/then. Either A or B is different than If not A then B.
 

Sapper Woody

Well-Known Member
No, you're an engineer, or you were, so I don't see why I have to explain it to you, but your statement was an either/or, Frankiin's was if/then. Either A or B is different than If not A then B.
Mathematically you'd be correct. But in every day English, either/or is equivalent to if/else.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top