By the same logic, there is no such thing as the Trinity, either.Originally posted by TCassidy:
No such thing as a "universal church." There is no such languaged ever used anywhere in the bible.![]()
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
By the same logic, there is no such thing as the Trinity, either.Originally posted by TCassidy:
No such thing as a "universal church." There is no such languaged ever used anywhere in the bible.![]()
Wrong! The Trinue nature of the Godhead is all through the scriptures.Originally posted by StefanM:
By the same logic, there is no such thing as the Trinity, either.
Any faithful church is His Bride. Remember the first rule of understanding, "never try to make a metaphor walk on all fours." "Bride" is a metaphor meaning "faithful." Every local church should be faithful to her Lord.Originally posted by OldRegular:
Which local church is the Bride of Jesus Christ or is He a polygamist as the Mormons would claim?
This is also clearly the meaning in 2 Corinthians 8:1.The churches of Asia greet you. Aquila and Prisca greet you heartily in the Lord, with the church that is in their house. NAS
But Paul also uses the word in another sense. This can be seen particularly in instances where it appears that the term should have been made plural. (e.g. Acts 9:31)“Now, brethren, we wish to make known to you the grace of God which has been given in the churches of Macedonia. NAS
[It’s interesting to note that there are textual variants where the word ‘church’ has been pluralized].“So the church throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria enjoyed peace, being built up; and going on in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Spirit, it continued to increase.” NAS
It could be argued that the church refers to the local body but the word church is surrounded by superlatives; “all things,” “all rule and authority and power and dominion,” “every name,” ‘…even in ages to come…, “the fullness of Him who fills all in all,” AND the word once again is in the singular tense. IMHO this once again is an instance of the collective or ‘universal’ church.” I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened, so that you will know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, and what is the surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe. These are in accordance with the working of the strength of His might which He brought about in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all.” NAS
Wrong! The Trinue nature of the Godhead is all through the scriptures. </font>[/QUOTE]There is "no such language" of the Trinity. It's implied, but it's not explicit.Originally posted by TCassidy:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by StefanM:
By the same logic, there is no such thing as the Trinity, either.
I will ask you the same question I used to ask my children when they made outlandish statements. Where is it written that, in this instance,Originally posted by TCassidy:
"Bride" is a metaphor meaning "faithful."
"Bride" is a metaphor meaning "faithful."
I hope you are not holding your breath garpier.Originally posted by garpier:
Would someone be so kind as to show where the local church is called a "bride." There is in Ephesians the illustration of the husband and wife as the way in which Christ loves the church. In Revelation where the Bride of Christ is mentioned, it is not in connection with a local church. The word for church as you know is ekklesia which was understood in the first century as a local visible assembly called out for a specific purpose. There is no usage of ekklesia in the New Testament which cannot be understood in this way.
Originally posted by garpier:
Holding my breath? No, I don't look good with a blue face.![]()