Featured Update on bicycle accident case..

About 10-12 years ago, a guy I was working with (a Mormon) and I would discuss religion and theology. One day he came in and shared with us that he'd gotten a ticket that morning for doing 70 in a 55. Asked him how much the fine was; he said it didn't matter, he was going to fight it and get out of the ticket. Asked him if he had actually been speeding; he admitted that yes, he was. Asked him why he was going to try to get out of the ticket; he just didn't want to pay it. We didn't have too many talks about religion or theology after that.

So Evangelist went before the judge, the judge found him guilty, but waived the fine. Sounds to me like the event's over.

 

Sounds to me like the event's over.

That's correct. End of subject.

One who takes exception to another always relies upon language such as, "You" did this; "You" did that; "He" said; "He" did; "He" admitted, etc.

The guy has already been before 'da judge. If the resulting verdict is inappropriate then one needs to take it up with the judge. Not criticize the one who was judged.

In keeping with the intent and purpose of our Constitution and spirit of the law, benefit of the doubt is to be afforded to the citizen. It's really that simple.

 

What is a walking class?

 

What is a walking class?

Folks like me are considered in the walking class.

Those most refined, polished, and sanitized by the Word of God who believe themselves to float along, are a notch above the walking class.

...you know, like the Penguin in the Movie, Blues Brothers? :laugh:

 

When I lived in Ohio it was not only legal to ride facing oncoming traffic, it was advised in some areas for safety reasons.

I think a lot of this depends on where one lives and how the roads and such are designed.

It's probably also quite possible for traffic density to change, areas to build up or become more deserted, and change the safety of the area for bicyclists. Changing the laws are not high priority, so I can see how it could happen that an area might become unsafe to follow the written laws in.

I don't know if it has changed, but Ohio didn't consider a bicycle to be a vehicle. There were some motorized vehicles that weren't considered such, so you would occasionally see someone with too many DUI's driving a small piece of farm machinery around because it wasn't considered a vehicle. One father used to come pick up his kiddo for visitation this way after he lost his license for a time for DUI's. That was pretty crazy to see!

 

1 Cor. 14:38 KJV.