Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Seek ye first the kingdom of God.Guess as an Independent Fundamental Baptist this will be my new home! I’m a new member if you can’t tell.
Something intresting to discuss, what is your guy’s view on how romantic relashionships should be done? I’ll start general and as we talk about it we can get specific.
Dating has changed, I learned.The modern mentality even among Baptists is "Dating = Mating". I attended two fundamental Baptist colleges with very strict dating regulations. Of course, I didn't LIKE restrictions, but it certainly was the best to develop spiritual relationship and not just physical.
It is not legalism anymore than the guard rail on the side of the road. It’s there to prevent you from going in the ditch.You should spend time together n groups at first to see if you are compatible, spiritually and socially, etc. Then carefully date, not coming over to each other's places to hang out. That is only danger waitng to happen. You don't need chaperones, that is legalism.
My wife and I were both Virgins when married, and never kissed even until at time of the ceremony, but celebrating 27 years this montha nd 2 grown boys laterThe modern mentality even among Baptists is "Dating = Mating". I attended two fundamental Baptist colleges with very strict dating regulations. Of course, I didn't LIKE restrictions, but it certainly was the best to develop spiritual relationship and not just physical.
When my wife and I first met, we usually could meet one day per week and on weekends only, and my commute was 90 miles to get there, and only week day could meet was Wen so always was in Church and was helping to teach childrens church with herIt is not legalism anymore than the guard rail on the side of the road. It’s there to prevent you from going in the ditch.
The advice you gave could be called legalism. What are groups but extra chaperones. So you suggest many chaperones instead of one? I don’t know what your experience is with chaperones but a dictionary definition is
chaperone /shăp′ə-rōn″
A chaperone is merely a companion. You may be focused on the restrictions. You have a legalism mentality.
- A guide or companion whose purpose is to ensure propriety or restrict activity.
- An older person who attends and supervises a social gathering for young people.
Chaperones are absolutely not legalism. Legalism is thinking that rules make you righteous. Chaperones are there to help the young people keep from temptation. These are two totally different things.You should spend time together n groups at first to see if you are compatible, spiritually and socially, etc. Then carefully date, not coming over to each other's places to hang out. That is only danger waitng to happen. You don't need chaperones, that is legalism.
The Joshua Harris "chaperones are required and only courting is allowed" is legalism, IMHO.Chaperones are absolutely not legalism. Legalism is thinking that rules make you righteous. Chaperones are there to help the young people keep from temptation. These are two totally different things.
Apparently he doesn’t either.The Joshua Harris "chaperones are required and only courting is allowed" is legalism, IMHO.
There is no need for them.Apparently he doesn’t either.
It seems he ha also changed his opinion.
“I no longer agreed with the central idea of I Kissed Dating Goodbye, that dating should be avoided,” he wrote. Harris also announced that he and his publisher had agreed to discontinue the book and its sequels in 2018.Harris apologized specifically to the “LGBTQ+ people” for “any pain or exclusion” his writings caused. Since renouncing his earlier work, Harris’ marriage ended in 2019, and he said he no longer identifies as an Evangelical Christian.
I have not read his book but I don’t think much of him now. I probably wouldn’t have then. But chaperones are not legalism anymore than a classroom monitor or a police officer on the street. They are there to help people stay out of trouble.
I am not saying this about you. I don’t know you. Anyone I have known who hated chaperones (in their place) ended up finding a time without them and regretting it.
I fail to see the value of avoiding them.
Years ago, someone told us: " Every date is a potential Mate!"My son was "talking" to a girl for about a year. This means they were friends. Went to a movie now and then. Then they discussed whether they should date.
Dating is done, apparently, with marriage in mind sometimes in the future if things work out.
So, Harris taught you can't be saved unless you follow some kind of courtship model?Joshua Harris "chaperones are required and only courting is allowed" is legalism, IMHO.
Armor is added weight, extra expense, and it doesn’t always seem to be effective. For hundreds of years people didn’t see the value of it. Sometime after the Civil War people began reconsidering the value of personal protection. You may not see the value of it but that doesn’t mean the value isn’t real.There is no need for them.
Get married.Guess as an Independent Fundamental Baptist this will be my new home! I’m a new member if you can’t tell.
Something intresting to discuss, what is your guy’s view on how romantic relashionships should be done? I’ll start general and as we talk about it we can get specific.