Virus and Vaccine Experts and "Experts"

[JonC]

You admitted it. In plain English. You were not kidding. Context proved you were not. I don't think you are a bad person, but you have become tunnel vision vaccine obsessed.
I am done with this. It is not worth it. "Rules for me and rules for thee" gets old fast.

No. This is spreading false information about another person. .I was not being literal (I suspect you know it).

I responded tongue in cheek to a conversation I though private and light hearted.

I thought it was humorous and that you took it as such.

But to correct your mistake - no, I was not being literal. Attached is the screen shot you said you'd post.

 

[Reformed1689]

What I posted on the public forum is not trolling. Now that you know this it will be lying to say otherwise.

Claiming something doesn't make it so if actions show otherwise.

 

[JonC]

I will give an example....Reformed1689 posted "Claiming something doesn't make it so if actions show otherwise." (Calling me a troll)

@Reformed1689 has replied to me, insulted me, on over 20 posts fairly recently. None of this has been in response to my posts to him (I don't post to him).

By your definitions @Reformed1689 is the biggest troll on this forum.

But maybe he is just posting to threads that interest him.

That is what I am doing. I am interested in how people defend their views on the vaccine and what sources they use.

But I do not mind @Reformed1689 posting to my posts even though you guys consider it trolling. He has that right. I just do not read his replies because I do not care what he has to say.

I do care what Revmitchell says because I believe him an intelligent Christian and even though he and I disagree I want to see what he says.

 

[Reynolds]

Be fair....you never cared about my view. I was here before you and we have bothn here a long time. We all know the only view you have ever cared about is your own.

That said, do not lie and say my behavior constitutes trolling. @Reynolds said that from a tongue in cheek comment I made on a pm when he called you stupid.

You call anybody a troll that disagrees with you. But the fact is I have just as much a right to argue against you as you have to argue against me.

OR were you trolling me when you responded to my posts???

I did not call him stupid. I called something he said stupid. "Getting stupid" means having a crazy interpretation of an issue. It is not a generality. You know that. Huge difference.

 

[Reynolds]

No. This is spreading false information about another person. .I was not being literal (I suspect you know it).

I responded tongue in cheek to a conversation I though private and light hearted.

I thought it was humorous and that you took it as such.

But to correct your mistake - no, I was not being literal. Attached is the screen shot you said you'd post.


View attachment 5422

That's actually not nearly all of it. My comment was about, and only about, DNA sequencing of Covid. To that particular issue, Rev was getting stupid.
Quit twisting stuff.

 

[Reynolds]

"Ok....I admit it to you (don't want hard feelings).....I'm pushing the covid-vax thing a bit of out of bounds to see what happens.

The Nazi thread was way over the line.

Then I read the global conspiracy thing, and Revmitchell's two threads where he didn't realize his op's were actually pro-vovid vaccine.

Scott's stuff have been way out in left field.

So I figured I'd go the opposite direction.

This stuff happens when I get bored.

I guess I'm a natural born antagonist. "

Remember posting that Jon? That's what started the exchange.

 

[Revmitchell]

"Ok....I admit it to you (don't want hard feelings).....I'm pushing the covid-vax thing a bit of out of bounds to see what happens.

The Nazi thread was way over the line.

Then I read the global conspiracy thing, and Revmitchell's two threads where he didn't realize his op's were actually pro-vovid vaccine.

Scott's stuff have been way out in left field.

So I figured I'd go the opposite direction.

This stuff happens when I get bored.

I guess I'm a natural born antagonist. "

Remember posting that Jon? That's what started the exchange.

And there you have it. Clear evidence of trolling. But it’s not new. He as much admitted in an open thread.

 

[JonC]

I did not call him stupid. I called something he said stupid. "Getting stupid" means having a crazy interpretation of an issue. It is not a generality. You know that. Huge difference.

If you get to say what I mean then I get to say what you mean. You said he was getting stupid.

Or are you trolling?

You know from our conversation what I meant but that did not stop you from misrepresenting me.

 

[JonC]

And there you have it. Clear evidence of trolling. But it’s not new. He as much admitted in an open thread.

No. I have said over and over again that arguing is my spiritual gift and that I am a natural born antagonist. Those things were tongue in cheek. Hence the smilies.

But yes, I have been pushing the issues. That is not the same as trolling.

And no, you are bearing false witness. I have never claimed to be trolling.

 

[JonC]

Thread is closed at the request of the OP and because a few have chosen to use it as an opportunity to slander.

Please feel free to start another.....but not using me or my pms. Any ermisdion rescinded because of gossips.