Voter Fraud Evidence Poll - Part 1- General Operation

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Do you know what quotation marks mean?

Yes, and how to use them. You used them claiming you were citing Barr’s exact words when all you did was quote an article saying approximately what he said. But perhaps you don’t know which antecedent went with the pronoun “he.”

You should have done earlier what you were finally forced to do here, namely quote Barr, not the article. But admittedly your way is more fun. Your comments are silly and sillier, and lots of laughs. You get two F’s, one for Failure and another for Funny. Thanks for playing.

 

[777]

One correction. It is entirely possible that Biden received 80 million votes. It's impossible that Biden received 80 million legal votes, or even close. The only way Biden wins this is by the massive cheating being allowed to stand.

here is the real plan:

 

[Revmitchell]

Here it is exactly: "Barr said Tuesday that the Justice Department has not found evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the vote."
No reason to change the result. OK? You are wasting taxpayer money and potentially causing civil unrest by perpetrating Trump's lie that the election results should be overturned because of widespread fraud.

Its not what barr said. In fact he clarified his statement after the lame stream press and folks like you lied about it.

 

[Baptist Believer]

here is the real plan:

The Supreme Court didn't say that rules don't matter. They ruled that Texas did not have standing to file the suit.

The "solution" you presented is inane and the Supreme Court would definitely shut down that foolishness.

 

[777]

It was supposed to be a joke. Like the election Biden won by theft.

 

[Benjamin]

Interesting to hear these guys spelling out how the Dems plan to game the system on the election and cause all kinds of chaos back on Aug 24, 2020 just like it went down. They also talked about that we may not know who the President is on January 20th. If not determined by Jan 20th the acting President becomes the Speaker of the House.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Yes, and how to use them. You used them claiming you were citing Barr’s exact words when all you did was quote an article saying approximately what he said. But perhaps you don’t know which antecedent went with the pronoun “he.”

You should have done earlier what you were finally forced to do here, namely quote Barr, not the article. But admittedly your way is more fun. Your comments are silly and sillier, and lots of laughs. You get two F’s, one for Failure and another for Funny. Thanks for playing.

What do you claim were Barr's exact words?

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

What do you claim were Barr's exact words?

Wait...are you now saying you still haven't managed to properly quote Barr, or only that your suspect sources failed? LOL. Your posts are a riot.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Wait...are you now saying you still haven't managed to properly quote Barr, or only that your suspect sources failed? LOL. Your posts are a riot.

I'm simply asking you a question.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

I'm simply asking you a question.

LOL. No, far from it. For reasons that escape me, your posts indicate an inability to follow the flow. Go back and carefully reread all of our posts. Then respond to my simple questions. Or not. But, if you are able to follow the flow, you will be able to answer your own question, since you already have.

 

[Benjamin]

Sidney Powell - still on a mission, confident, determined, working hard, says standing will not be problem with her cases:

Another copy in case they are removed:

 

[Benjamin]

WOW! Concrete evidence that there is no integrity to the Georgia voting results!!