Humblesmith
Member
That which determines the will is that which causes it to choose. If the will is determined, then there must be a determiner. What is it that determines the will? We reply, the strongest motive power which is brought to bear upon it. What this motive power is, varies in different cases. With one it may be the logic of reason, with another the voice of conscience, with another the impulse of the emotions, with another the whisper of the Tempter, with another the power of the Holy Spirit; whichever of these presents the strongest motive power and exerts the greatest influence upon the individual himself, is that which impels the will to act. (Pink, The Sovereignty of God, 162)
The great majority of these die in utter ignorance of the Way of Peace. Now are we not obliged to conclude that it was not God’s will to communicate grace to them? Had His will been otherwise, would he not have actually communicated His grace to them? . . . it was the will of God, in time, to refuse to them His grace . . . Therefore from His actually leaving some men in final impenitency and unbelief we assuredly gather it was His everlasting determination so to do; and consequently that He reprobated some from before the foundation of the world. (Pink, The Soveignty of God, 102-103)
the wicked are made for the Day of Evil; that God fashions some vessels unto dishonor; and by His eternal decree (objectively) fits them unto destruction; that they are like brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, being of old ordained unto this condemnation. (Pink, The Sovereignty of God, 122)
the decree of reprobation neither interferes with the bent of man’s own fallen nature, nor serves to render him the less inexcusable. (Pink, The Sovereignty of God, 124.)
What Pink does not explain is how God can 'make the evil' people, and ‘reprobate some from the foundation of the world’ yet ‘not interfere with the bent of man’s own fallen nature.’ He does clearly teach that he believes men are as brute beasts, that God makes to be taken and destroyed. He also clearly believes that salvation is "impelled" on man by the "strongest motive force" of the Holy Spirit. Johnathan Edwards speaks at length to support the same idea, saying that "the will is always determined by the strongest motive." (Johnathan Edwards Reader, 196).
So what I don't understand is why people today hold that they never taught the will is impelled (forced) into salvation, when they clearly teach that..........and that the image of God is stil present, when Pink clearly describes them as brute beasts.
The great majority of these die in utter ignorance of the Way of Peace. Now are we not obliged to conclude that it was not God’s will to communicate grace to them? Had His will been otherwise, would he not have actually communicated His grace to them? . . . it was the will of God, in time, to refuse to them His grace . . . Therefore from His actually leaving some men in final impenitency and unbelief we assuredly gather it was His everlasting determination so to do; and consequently that He reprobated some from before the foundation of the world. (Pink, The Soveignty of God, 102-103)
the wicked are made for the Day of Evil; that God fashions some vessels unto dishonor; and by His eternal decree (objectively) fits them unto destruction; that they are like brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, being of old ordained unto this condemnation. (Pink, The Sovereignty of God, 122)
the decree of reprobation neither interferes with the bent of man’s own fallen nature, nor serves to render him the less inexcusable. (Pink, The Sovereignty of God, 124.)
What Pink does not explain is how God can 'make the evil' people, and ‘reprobate some from the foundation of the world’ yet ‘not interfere with the bent of man’s own fallen nature.’ He does clearly teach that he believes men are as brute beasts, that God makes to be taken and destroyed. He also clearly believes that salvation is "impelled" on man by the "strongest motive force" of the Holy Spirit. Johnathan Edwards speaks at length to support the same idea, saying that "the will is always determined by the strongest motive." (Johnathan Edwards Reader, 196).
So what I don't understand is why people today hold that they never taught the will is impelled (forced) into salvation, when they clearly teach that..........and that the image of God is stil present, when Pink clearly describes them as brute beasts.