I didn't lock down the first time, but who knows? I might take 6 months off work and get me some of that mail box money this time.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Warning sounds of a new lock down coming here?
- Thread starter Scott Downey
- Start date
I am kind of enjoying staying away from the crowds. I have been Deer, hog, Turkey, Dove, Fox, Bobcat, and Coyote hunting much more than usual. Fishing a lot more. Being around non-family is over rated.
Good. In SC (SC Code, Title 56, Section 56-5-6520) seat-belts are "manditory".
Now I know they can't give me a ticket.
Probably not, no state was willing to lose it's Federal Highway funding.
Didn't think of finding. It is still odd to me that in SC I have to wear a seatbelt but can do 70 on a motorcycle without a helmet.
Feds have not dangled a carrot and waved a stick about helmets I guess.
What does it say at the top of the page?
On the top of the SC page?
It says:
UNIFORM ACT REGULATING TRAFFIC ON HIGHWAYS
Section 56-5-6520 - Mandatory use of seat belt.
Can you do 70 in a car without a helmet?
South Carolina’s Child Safety Seat and Seatbelt Laws
This is what it says on the top of the page that I linked. Maybe your link favored your mandate debate to debunk my earlier post.
Yep. Do you have to have a seat belt on your motorcycle?
I don't give a hill of dung about your source. I am talking about SC Code, Title 56, Section 56-5-6520.
It is law, but the language used is "manditory". The idea that if it says "manditory" it is not law us just stupid.
But……but…..what if it says mandatory & it is not law? That was the whole point, eh? Your non point made for another negative on this board, so thanks for that.
Oh... I see. You mean if the people who make laws say "manditory" then it is law....but if the people who do not make laws say "manditory" then it is not a law.
I agree. I have been places where masks were manditory and I could be fined because it was a city statute. But I have also been places where masks were manditory and all they could do was not allow me in or fire me.
I don't have a motorcycle now.
Me neither.