Heavenly Pilgrim
New Member
HP: I suppose the real crux of this whole issue we are currently discussing is whether or not one can be right with God without having eternal life. I see Adam as before the fall right with God in a state of holiness and obedience. For one to deny that in that state he was not in possession of eternal life is to me a simply not reasonable or according to Scripture.Brother Bob: I have no problem whatsoever with the way you explain if Adam had not of eaten. I agree he was free to eat of all the trees except the tree of knowledge but the Bible is silent whether he ate of the Tree of Life.
The idea, that man, in this present world in possession of a hope of eternal life, cannot fall from that state and come under the condemnation of the law, is beyond the scope of the nature of salvation. For one to assume that any future acts of disobedience are literally already paid for simply circumvents the “sword” of repentance you obviously believe in. I maintain that no man can have assurance of sin forgiven apart from sincere repentance and faith. For one to entertain a hope of eternal life, while possessing an evil conscience, is simply nothing short of presumptuously believing in forgiveness apart from repentance, an unscriptural idea at best, eternally dangerous at worst.
Please do not read into this in any way that I am criticizing a personal belief you have represented. I am unsure how you feel in many areas. I am just addressing the issues as I see them, and you happen to be so kind as to be responding. I am sure I have much to learn from your thoughts. God has taken you down some roads and revealed to you some things I have yet to travel or understand. I am grateful for the testimony you have, that God is sufficient for every trial and circumstance. I am also grateful for your clear stand on the necessity of heartfelt repentance and a holy walk before the Lord.