Was the Nkjv translated from same sorce texts as used by the 1611 translators for Kjv then?

[Logos1560]

"Which Bible is the Word of God?"​

©2000 by James M. Frye;​

"Of all the "Bibles" that are readily available today, there is only one that comes from the Textus Receptus
and is translated according to the Formal Equivalency method - the Authorized Version (KJV).

James Frye fails to prove his opinion to be true. The KJV is not the only Bible available today that comes from the Textus Receptus.

English Bible translations such as the 1833 Webster’s Bible, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Baptists, the 1982 NKJV, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the 1994 21st Century King James Version, the 1998 Third Millennium Bible, the King James 2000 Version, 2000/2013 Jubilee Bible, the 2014 Modern English Version, the 2022 Simplified KJV, and Nick Sayers’ 2023 King James Version New Testament can be considered as being based on the same multiple editions of the Textus Receptus as the KJV. The 1833 Webster's Bible was reprinted in 1987 so it was made available again.

 

[Logos1560]

How do KJV-only advocates rationalize or excuse in their minds the improper, bogus, non-true attempt to associate the word of God in present standard English in the NKJV with the New World Translation of Jehovah's Witnesses? Is this use of the guilt-by-association fallacy?