• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Was the Serpent in Genesis 3 a Literal Snake?

Was The Serpent in Genesis 3 a Literal Snake?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 4 26.7%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 2 13.3%

  • Total voters
    15

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do not understand the way that you are using the word "manifestation" in this reply so I do not how to respond to this reply.
I think I am using "manifestation" in the usual way. Satan "appeared" to be one of the creatures in the Garden. Eve was fooled completely, she did not realize she was being led astray. But the harmless creature was not what it appeared to be, it was Satan in disguise.

Now it might not seem just to hold an animal accountable for an inadvertent action, but for a greater purpose (indicating the value of human life) God does hold animals accountable. If an ox kills a person, the ox is to be killed. Not because it did anything it knew was wrong, but to teach mankind about the value of human life.

Here we have an animal (all of that kind) being held accountable to teach mankind.
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
Angels are in the image of God. They're called sons of God, among other names. They are morally aware beings, created directly by God. Adam is also called the son of God, being directly created (Luke 3:38), but he's the only one, since we're the result of procreation. We are sons of Adam until we accept Christ and become children of God by adoption.

Animals, for sure, are not made in the image of God. The contrast is clear in Genesis 1.

I disagree. The Scripture specifies that humans were made in God's image, but it never says that angels were.

I do not ever remember reading any theological materials in all my seminary training that took the position that angels are in the image of God. Here are two articles that take somewhat differing positions:

Are Angels in the Image of God? - BJU Seminary

Were Angels Created in the Image of God?
 
I disagree. The Scripture specifies that humans were made in God's image, but it never says that angels were.

I do not ever remember reading any theological materials in all my seminary training that took the position that angels are in the image of God. Here are two articles that take somewhat differing positions:

Are Angels in the Image of God? - BJU Seminary

Were Angels Created in the Image of God?


Dwayne: I am inclined to believe that the serpent in the garden was a real snake that had legs and could talk, and that he somehow conspired with satan to deceive Eve. If the serpent was satan himself in the form of a snake why would God punish real snakes for something they had no part in?
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
Dwayne: I am inclined to believe that the serpent in the garden was a real snake that had legs and could talk, and that he somehow conspired with satan to deceive Eve. If the serpent was satan himself in the form of a snake why would God punish real snakes for something they had no part in?
Broadly speaking, this has been my position for some time now.

God created serpents as good animals. He pronounced them as good when He declared that everything that He had made was very good.

For Him to later curse one of His very good creatures because another one of His creatures chose merely to appear in the same form as the very good creature and do evil while appearing in that form does not commend itself to me as something that a just God would do.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Broadly speaking, this has been my position for some time now.

God created serpents as good animals. He pronounced them as good when He declared that everything that He had made was very good.

For Him to later curse one of His very good creatures because another one of His creatures chose merely to appear in the same form as the very good creature and do evil while appearing in that form does not commend itself to me as something that a just God would do.
You and @Dwayne McDowell my very well be correct in your conclusions. But I personally do not think there is enough evidence to make those conclusions. Just saying.
 

Reformed1689

Well-Known Member
Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Some believers hold that the serpent in Genesis 3 was not a literal snake. They believe that Satan appeared to Eve in a snake-like form.

Other believers hold that the serpent in Genesis 3 was a literal snake whom Satan somehow directed to deceive Eve.

Do you believe that this serpent was a literal snake?
There is nothing in the text to indicate that it is not literal.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I disagree. The Scripture specifies that humans were made in God's image, but it never says that angels were.

I do not ever remember reading any theological materials in all my seminary training that took the position that angels are in the image of God. Here are two articles that take somewhat differing positions:

Are Angels in the Image of God? - BJU Seminary

Were Angels Created in the Image of God?

Angels are sons of God and morally aware. Thus they can sin and are responsible. Animals cannot sin. If you're seminary taught you animals can sin, you're been mislead.
 

MB

Well-Known Member
What makes you think Satan has the power to do this?
The angles have the power to assume the likeness of men. Satan was a powerful angle. What better way to be the master at deception.Demons are fallen angels and they are recorded to enter men and pigs. This is why I said that Satan entered the snake. He possessed the snake.
MB
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
...For Him to later curse one of His very good creatures because another one of His creatures chose merely to appear in the same form as the very good creature and do evil while appearing in that form does not commend itself to me as something that a just God would do.

Well, then you'd have big problems with Paul.

Rom. 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; 21 because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.​

All creation was cursed because of Adam. All groan in anticipation of Christ who will restore all things.
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
The angles have the power to assume the likeness of men. Satan was a powerful angle. What better way to be the master at deception.Demons are fallen angels and they are recorded to enter men and pigs. This is why I said that Satan entered the snake. He possessed the snake.
MB
Entering a snake and possessing a real snake is very different from just appearing in a snake-like form. I believe that Satan did do something along the lines of the former, but I reject that he did do or could have done the latter.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My seminary did not teach me that. God's punishing the serpent shows that He did hold the serpent accountable for what it did.

And the Serpent is identified as Satan. Satan often uses instruments to do his mischief (for lack of a better word). God altered the instrument of the snake, but the snake itself does not feel this punishment. He is one of the most successful animals on the planet.
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
Well, then you'd have big problems with Paul.

Rom. 8:19 For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; 21 because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.​

All creation was cursed because of Adam. All groan in anticipation of Christ who will restore all things.

What Romans 8:19-22 teaches is different from the specific curse on the serpent. I do not have any problems with what Romans 8:19-22 teaches.

Genesis 3:14 was not a punishment imposed on the serpent because of Adam; it states directly that God told the serpent that it was being cursed because of what it had done.
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And the Serpent is identified as Satan. Satan often uses instruments to do his mischief (for lack of a better word). God altered the instrument of the snake, but the snake itself does not feel this punishment. He is one of the most successful animals on the planet.

And he likely was not the only only animals changed at the time of the Curse. We know thorns were given to some plants. We can infer that stingers and quills may have been added to some animals along with other defense/attack structures.

An interesting read: How Did Defense/Attack Structures Come About?
 

Calminian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What Romans 8:19-22 teaches is different from the specific curse on the serpent. I do not have any problems with what Romans 8:19-22 teaches.

Genesis 3:14 was not a punishment imposed on the serpent because of Adam; it states directly that God told the serpent that it was being cursed because of what it had done.

I've already affirmed the physically changes of the snake were in response to the devil's sin. You have not responded yet to my argument.
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
And he likely was not the only only animals changed at the time of the Curse. We know thorns were given to some plants. We can infer that stingers and quills may have been added to some animals along with other defense/attack structures.

An interesting read: How Did Defense/Attack Structures Come About?

I agree that there were likely many animals changed after the Fall. That article was a good read. Thanks.
 

MB

Well-Known Member
Entering a snake and possessing a real snake is very different from just appearing in a snake-like form. I believe that Satan did do something along the lines of the former, but I reject that he did do or could have done the latter.
To me as I have read the story Satan entered the snake. the reason the Snake was cursed is because the snake was a willing participant. Being possessed is by willingness or passiveness or not caring about it one way or the other. The reason is my opinion and, is not as far as I know scriptural.
MB
 

Scripture More Accurately

Well-Known Member
I've already affirmed the physically changes of the snake were in response to the devil's sin. You have not responded yet to my argument.
I do not believe that the physical changes were due to the devil's sin that he perpetrated through an unwilling instrument (the snake). I believe that both the snake and the devil were punished because both teamed up in some manner to do what was done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MB
Top