Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I would love to think that Adam and Eve were eventually saved.
But, there is no account of it occurring.
Neither Adam nor the Woman repented with Godly sorrow, but blamed, excused and were ashamed.
I have wondered if those two would be fit for an example of Hebrews 6.
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
For the earth which drinks in the rain that comes oft upon it, and brings forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receives blessing from God: But that which bears thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
[SIZE=+0]Hebrews does not deal with what Adam and Eve did. It is speaking to the Jew.. It is speaking about someone who has all the proof that can be given and even took part in the ceremonies and feasts and still never gets saved, but walks away. There is no more that can be revealed to them to renew then again unto repentance.[/SIZE]
Adam and Eve both knew God, they walked with Him and after their fall He covered them. He did not cover them because they were cold. It is a symbol that they were saved and how all men must be saved.
or were they lost sinners?
I would love to think that Adam and Eve were eventually saved.
But, there is no account of it occurring.
Neither Adam nor the Woman repented with Godly sorrow, but blamed, excused and were ashamed.
I have wondered if those two would be fit for an example of Hebrews 6.
For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
For the earth which drinks in the rain that comes oft upon it, and brings forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receives blessing from God: But that which bears thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
Do you really assume this by the limited appearance of Adam and Eve in the biblical narrative? Is it not possible that somethings about God et al are not even addressed in our scriptures?
You asked two questions. The first is asking my assumptions.
I do not assume, but I merely speculating.
There is no proof of redemption that I have found.
Because both Cain and Able brought sacrifices to the Lord, they had some thoughts of a need to make offerings to God.
But, that is as it is in all cultures. Humankind has always needed and performed some offering/sacrifices to their god.
Was it out of the imprint in the heart, or the training of Adam. The Scriptures are silent - one would have to speculate. And speculation is not proof.
The second question you asked is about something not addressed in Scriptures, to which I would reply that; I suppose that there are a great number of items not addressed in the Scriptures.
The Bible does not answer every question, such as the one in the OP.
For one to lock in an answer based upon supposition seems terribly weak.
Here is something that is not an assumption.
The Scriptures state that God would come to Adam to fellowship with him in the cool of the evening and they would walk and talk, together.
The Scriptures teach that no man has seen the Father except the Son.
Who daily walked with Adam in the cool of each evening?
OK, allow me to rephrase, as I was not intending "assume" to be an "assaultive" word. Is it your "speculation" that they were not "saved" or in anyway covered by the grace of God?
I think that was the point I was trying to make, the scriptural record is often silent on things that "we think we would like to know". As for these things, we are left only to our speculation.
God "took responsibility" for the fall of Adam and Eve,
therefore he did not condemn them but provided a
"covering" for them.