The believers in Acts 19:1-6 believed in the coming Messiah, had even been baptized by John the Baptist, yet they had not received the Holy Spirit.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The believers in Acts 19:1-6 believed in the coming Messiah, had even been baptized by John the Baptist, yet they had not received the Holy Spirit.
The New Birth had to be in operation in that day because the Lord would not demand that men 'must be born again' to see and enter into the Kingdom of God.
The believers in Acts 19:1-6 believed in the coming Messiah, had even been baptized by John the Baptist, yet they had not received the Holy Spirit.
"Regeneration" in the New Testament simply means "born again," and while we usually have someone make the statement "'Born Again' in John 3 simply means born from above," and that is true, it also remains true that when one is born again it is a given that they are born from above, or, as we see in many places, Born of God:
Titus 3:4-5
King James Version (KJV)
4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
We are saved by...
...the washing of regeneration, which speaks of the promised cleansing which takes place when one is made a "new creature," which itself effected by...
...the renewing of the Holy Ghost, which is the "reunion" of God with man. Rather than the Holy Ghost renewing us, which is already pointed out in the washing of regeneration.
Scripture does not teach a partial "new birth." While men effect "partial births," and we can see the abomination that is, God does not recreate men partially, but completely.
We are made new creatures, and what is taking place is a spiritual resurrection, which as Christ taught, is like the wind: we can see the effect, but not what effects that affect.
So what is your understanding of that verse?
I'm not sure. According to this:
Eph. 1:13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit,
and this:
Gal 4:6 Because you are his sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, the Spirit who calls out, “Abba, Father.”
...these people in Acts 19 were not regenerated. So neither were people in the OT that had not received the Holy Spirit. That's how it appears to me.
I'm wide open for teaching on this subject.
Depends on what it means to enter the Kingdom of God, and what it means to see it.
The church is indwelt with the HG. OT saints were not. The HG works internally through the church. In OT the HG worked externally.
Most believe we enter the Kingdom of God sometime during this life - typically at conversion.
Matt 5:20
For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven
Mark 10:15
Truly I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it at all
Sounds ok so far. Child-like faith and such. However.....
Matt 7:21
Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.
And Jesus said, "On THAT day..." (v 22)
Future, yet to come. On that day we will enter.
Look what Paul said after being stoned at Antioch - “Through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.” (Acts 14:22)
Are we to believe we must endure many tribulations before we are deemed worthy of being converted? No. Entering the Kingdom will be on THAT day.
2Pet 1:10-11
10 Therefore, brethren, be all the more diligent to make certain about His calling and choosing you; for as long as you practice these things, you will never stumble;
11 for in this way the entrance into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ WILL BE abundantly supplied to you.
And that was written to believers
What about seeing the Kingdom?
Mark 9:1
[ The Transfiguration ] And Jesus was saying to them, “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power.”
After it had come with power.
Jesus said to Nicodemus that He would not be able to see the Kingdom AFTER it had come with power, nor enter it on THAT day, unless he was born again.
And he was not born again until the perfect blood was shed
OK, so were the people in Acts 19 regenerated before they received the Holy Spirit via the laying on of hands by Paul? Or were they regenerated when they received the Holy Spirit?
Originally Posted by Darrell C View Post
"Regeneration" in the New Testament simply means "born again," and while we usually have someone make the statement "'Born Again' in John 3 simply means born from above," and that is true, it also remains true that when one is born again it is a given that they are born from above, or, as we see in many places, Born of God:
Titus 3:4-5
King James Version (KJV)
4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
We are saved by...
...the washing of regeneration, which speaks of the promised cleansing which takes place when one is made a "new creature," which itself effected by...
...the renewing of the Holy Ghost, which is the "reunion" of God with man. Rather than the Holy Ghost renewing us, which is already pointed out in the washing of regeneration.
Scripture does not teach a partial "new birth." While men effect "partial births," and we can see the abomination that is, God does not recreate men partially, but completely.
We are made new creatures, and what is taking place is a spiritual resurrection, which as Christ taught, is like the wind: we can see the effect, but not what effects that affect.
What is one washed of, when born again, thereby saving him?
Ezekiel 36:22-27
King James Version (KJV)
22 Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went.
23 And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord, saith the Lord God, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes.
24 For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.
25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.
26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.
But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. Romans 8:11
Is that the same, Spirit of Adoption of verse 15 whereby one can call God, Father? The same Spirit one has the first fruit thereof which brings forth, the adoption, the redemption of the body of verse 23? Is the quickening of the mortal body the same as the redemption of the body? Is that the hope of verses 24,25 of which one does not yet see?
Could from the receiving of the Spirit unto the redemption of the body be construed as the time spent in the womb?
That comes up every time, and is a legitimate point to be addressed.
The question asked is does this...
John 20:22
King James Version (KJV)
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
...speak of Christ giving them the Holy Ghost at this time, which would indicate the indwelling of the Comforter before Pentecost?
The answer is it couldn't possibly be stating that, as would bring conflict to one singular truth: Christ was still present with them and the Comforter could not come until He returned to Heaven. Then would the Comforter be sent, and not a minute before:
John 16:7
King James Version (KJV)
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
Secondly, and more conclusively, we see that realized in Scripture as a truth that is without controversy here...
Acts 1
King James Version (KJV)
4 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.
We know the Lord returns to Heaven just after making this statement, and He states it will be "not many days hence."
That precludes fulfillment of the sending of the Comforter at the time of John 20:22.
So what do we make of it? It isn't that difficult, really, it is simply viewed in the prophetic, as many of Christ's teachings and statement are.
For example...
John 15
King James Version (KJV)
1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.
4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
Many who read this see this (abiding in Christ) as something the disciples could accomplish at the time of the teaching.
We know that is not the case because the disciples, to the man...would abandon Christ in just a few short hours, Peter cursing and denying he even knew Christ.
Kind of hard to impose an "abiding" on the disciples in fulfillment of a command that looks to the future, as most of John 14-16 does. If we understand that in the same context we understand the teaching of the coming of the Comforter, we do not erroneously impose fulfillment in that day.
And the Lord knew that in that day they would not abode:
John 16:31-32
King James Version (KJV)
31 Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe?
32 Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.
That is correct, but the "contradiction" is cleared rather easily if we maintain the proper context.
And that is not the only point of division in the Body of Christ concerning Scripture which is cleared up. Take the Free Will controversy that has resulted in not only division in the Body, but hatred and murder. This too is easily cleared up if we apply Christ's teaching in it's proper context:
John 16:7-9
King James Version (KJV)
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;
We see that when He is come He will convict unbelievers. Simple as that.
And that is in accordance with how all men have been ministered to by God throughout the various Ages. We see that here:
Acts 7:51
King James Version (KJV)
51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
God has always ministered in the hearts of men by His Spirit, and the distinction we see in the various Ages is the revelation provided to men in those various Ages. In this Age it is the Gospel. And when we couple this with the fact that the Gospel of Christ was a Mystery, a previously unrevealed truth, we can see that there is a difference in God's Ministry in regards to man's Redemption.
We already know the answer to that...not at all. The Comforter could not come, and we see He did not come, until "not many days" after the Lord's Ascension.
The controversy and seeming contradiction is cleared up in maintain Christ's teaching as He gave it to His disciples.
And I would just throw this in, which has relevance to a Trinitarian belief (of which I affirm adamantly): when we are indwelt by God we are indwelt by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
We already know that the Spirit is said to be the One Christ and the Father would send, but have you considered...
John 14:23
King James Version (KJV)
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
The Son once again testifies of the unity of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
God bless.
The water here, as well as in John, is not physical water which "puts away the filth of the flesh," as Peter makes clear, but is the same water we see used for cleansing here:
Ephesians 5:25-26
King James Version (KJV)
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
Who is and was, the firstborn from the dead Col. 1:18, ascended to the right hand of the Father
and received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, Acts 2:32,33
that then could shed, poured out, on us John 16:7?
Bro. Darrel, et.al. ---
I think our last couple posts on the activities of the HS are to some extent starting to stray from the intended subject of the OP. With this thought in mind, I think it best to open up a new thread rather than to continue hijacking this thread.
I'll try to do this as soon as I can get the time to do this because Saturdays are usually very busy days for me.
---WPE3BQL
Originally Posted by Darrell C View Post
The water here, as well as in John, is not physical water which "puts away the filth of the flesh," as Peter makes clear, but is the same water we see used for cleansing here:
Ephesians 5:25-26
King James Version (KJV)
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
I was an inch away from bringing up the same point.
What does the washing in Titus 3:5 look like?
Don't forget about verse 27.....
25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her,
26 so that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,
27 that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless.
The washing of regeneration is a cleansing
Heb 9:13-14
13 For if the blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling those who have been defiled sanctify for the cleansing of the flesh,
14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?
Bro. Darrel, et.al. ---
I think our last couple posts on the activities of the HS are to some extent starting to stray from the intended subject of the OP....
---WPE3BQL