Westcott and Hort

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by Mexdeaf:
/qb]

The NIV is not an Translation, it is a vesion[/QUOTE]

I am sure that this will be news to the NIV translation committee.

[/QB][/QUOTE]
I'm sure their commitee had tranlators, but why translate it again and again when the AV 1611 wasn't broken to begin with , why did they need "Politically correct" "Theologians" to Translate something that had already been translated; as I see it there are no more translations only revisions and copywrited versions in the English language. unless you some how want glory out of writting the TR in your own words.

 

[Forever settled in heaven]

Originally posted by william s. correa:

I'm sure their commitee had tranlators, but why translate it again and again when the AV 1611 wasn't broken to begin with , why did they need "Politically correct" "Theologians" to Translate something that had already been translated; as I see it there are no more translations only revisions and copywrited versions in the English language. unless you some how want glory out of writting the TR in your own words.

n why "translate" the KJB if the bibles before 1611 weren't broken either?

also, by the logic of ur kind, isn't it enuff for the Holy Spirit to make the TR n Bomberg text plain to any reader? why even make a "Vesion" in 1611?

why all the nifty arguments n serpentine hissin ("Yea hath God said") rather than accepting God's Word in our hands? sometimes i havta wonder who's doing the "mind-worship"?

 

[william s. correa]

Originally posted by Forever settled in heaven:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by william s. correa:

I'm sure their commitee had tranlators, but why translate it again and again when the AV 1611 wasn't broken to begin with , why did they need "Politically correct" "Theologians" to Translate something that had already been translated; as I see it there are no more translations only revisions and copywrited versions in the English language. unless you some how want glory out of writting the TR in your own words.

n why "translate" the KJB if the bibles before 1611 weren't broken either?

also, by the logic of ur kind, isn't it enuff for the Holy Spirit to make the TR n Bomberg text plain to any reader? why even make a "Vesion" in 1611?

why all the nifty arguments n serpentine hissin ("Yea hath God said") rather than accepting God's Word in our hands? sometimes i havta wonder who's doing the "mind-worship"?

</font>[/QUOTE]Grow up talk and with your buddy TCassidy. Wycliff was right

 

[rsr]

Right about what?

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

I think this thread has served its purpose - it is now on page 12 and we have exhausted all of our dicsussion about Westcott and Hort.