O.K.All I am saying is that I sen no reason to exclude one to the other. Not even sure why anyone would believe why that is not bared out in the passage. as you say.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
O.K.All I am saying is that I sen no reason to exclude one to the other. Not even sure why anyone would believe why that is not bared out in the passage. as you say.
What law is written on their hearts?The Bible says that the gentiles have the law of God written on their hearts.
What law is written on their hearts?
.Heb 4:8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
There is no Sabbath here at all. You have missed the mark completely
The anonymous author of Hebrews found different ways of describing the superiority of the Lord Jesus Christ. One of them, which forms the underlying motif of chapters 3 and 4, is that Jesus Christ gives the rest that neither Moses nor Joshua could provide. Under Moses, the people of God were disobedient and failed to enter into God’s rest (3:18). Psalm 95:11 (quoted in Hebrews 4:3) implies that Joshua could not have given the people “real rest” since “through David” God speaks about the rest he will give on another day (Heb. 4:7). This in turn implies that “There remains a sabbath rest for the people of God” (Heb. 4:9).
In speaking of this rest (3:18; 4:1, 3-6, 8) the author consistently used the same word for “rest” (katapausis). Suddenly, in speaking about the “rest” that remains for the people of God, he uses a different word (sabbatismos, used only here in the NT) meaning specifically a Sabbath rest. In the context of his teaching, this refers fundamentally to the “Sabbath rest” which is found in Christ (“Come … I will give you rest,” Matt. 11:28-30). Thus we are to “strive to enter that rest” (4:11).
.I do not know how you have determined that I believe commandments are suggestions, but I can assure you that was not implied
okI understand your position (thanks for the explanation) but here you have severely misunderstood mine. Perhaps this will help clarify.
No...men are under the Decalogue period.......not as reflected, but actual.All men are you under God's moral law as reflected in Torah and embodied in Christ.
AgreedGod is immutable, his standard of morality does not change from person to person.
No....that is not the question at allSo we are not taking about whether or not all men are under God's moral law (they are) but whether or not this covenantal Law applies universally.
They existed since creation as far as man is concernedDo you deny that the Ten Commandments were given through Moses to Israel within a specific and exclusive covenant?
.I understand you believe Scripture to imply these Ten Commandments as given at Creation to men
You have not stated my view yet, so to defend what you are speaking about is an "unintentional" strawman.But your mistake here is twofold.
First, when Paul speaks of the Law and those under the Law he is speaking of a covenant relationship (notice, there are some outside the Law).
Second, God's moral Law exceeds these literal commands. What you are missing is that God Himself is revealed to Israel through the Law.
That is what I meant in the PM yesterday.In principle we do agree, whether you recognize it or not, that God's moral law is inherent in men being created in His image.
Where did I say anything that leads you to believe that I do not think God deals with men in terms of Covenant?We disagree in that I believe God relates to men throughout redemptive history in covenantal terms rather than universal generalities and the Law is covenantal.
Iconoclast said: ↑
What other law should he use? Swedish law? French law? Were the ten commandments God given?
Question begging
Maybe because the very basis of the Gospel itself is based on Law Keeping.Why should the law, any law, be used at all?
The best missionary/evangelist to the Gentiles in history did not use the Law in his efforts and that point is useless to prove my argument that using the Law is not the preferred method to evangelize....
Okey, dokey.
Yes, and they being Jews, didn't have to be told that they were sinners, or that they had to repent of specific sins. They had lived by the law all of their lives. No man can keep the law and they, more than any other nation or person, knew it.
opps....here it is again;Follow along...
Jesus preached primarily to the Jews.
Paul preached to the Jews first, then to the Greeks (Rom. 1:16). Paul was primarily sent to the Gentiles (Gal. 2:8)
Since most of us witness to Gentiles, if anyone in the Bible should be our model for evangelism, it should be Paul.
Paul did not use the Law to evangelize to Gentiles (that we know of).
Ergo, using the Law is not the "preferred" way to evangelize Gentiles.
Nowhere, brother, for the very good reason that there is no example whatsoever of anyone in the NT coming to a town and telling the unsaved, "Jesus loves you soooooo much! Now won't you love Him back? The message I picked up from that sort of witness as a young man was that God was a bit of a loser and that I ought to feel sorry for Him. It was a bit like being told that the ugliest girl in the class has a crush on you.Where does scripture say this affirms that.Martin Marprelate said:Telling people that God loves them before they have repented and trusted in Christ merely affirms them in their sin.
I know; I was that man.
I am finding that "the moral law" means different things to different people. How do you define it?Moral law
I am finding that "the moral law" means different things to different people. How do you define it?
It is your quote that misses the mark. Even the word "sabbatisimos means "rest."DHK,
.
Actually as we look at it, you are once again in complete error,lol...and yet look to lecture us and inflict error upon us.
YOU HAVE COMPLETELY MISSED THIS;
http://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/sabbath-rest/
That doesn't answer my question. But if you mean the "Sabbath Day" is included in the Decalogue, and man must keep it, why don't you keep it? Read my response to Icon. There isn't an individual on this board that keeps the Sabbath Day. Therefore no one keeps the Ten Commandments. The totality of the Decalogue is not the "moral law."Exodus 20
You are off topic. I went through the entire sermon with you. I explained each and every verse. Paul did not quote any of these verses, so why do you. You are off topic, and these scriptures are all red herrings. Paul did not quote the entire 39 books of the OT but you seem at liberty to use them. Use the scripture that Paul used in the sermon that he preached in Acts 13.DHK,
Every prophet told them they needed to repent;
1 The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz, which he saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.
2 Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the Lord hath spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me.
3 The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider.
4 Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward.
5 Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint.
6 From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.
7 Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.
8 And the daughter of Zion is left as a cottage in a vineyard, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city.
9 Except the Lord of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, and we should have been like unto Gomorrah.
10 Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; give ear unto the law of our God, ye people of Gomorrah.
11 To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats.
12 When ye come to appear before me, who hath required this at your hand, to tread my courts?
13 Bring no more vain oblations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting.
14 Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth: they are a trouble unto me; I am weary to bear them.
15 And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood.
16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;
17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land:
20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.
21 How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers.
That doesn't answer my question. But if you mean the "Sabbath Day" is included in the Decalogue, and man must keep it, why don't you keep it? Read my response to Icon. There isn't an individual on this board that keeps the Sabbath Day. Therefore no one keeps the Ten Commandments. The totality of the Decalogue is not the "moral law."
Brother, you say that the Ten Commandments are the moral law, minus the 4th Commandment (so it seems to me you mean the Nine Commandments). What gives us the authority to separate the 4th from the rest, or to take as principle the 4th, if these themselves are God's moral law?Sorry I meant to say minus the sabbath rest. So you do not believe the 10 commandments is the moral law? Why? Explain.
Look it's not keeping the 10 commandments that makes one righteous its Christ. The 10 commandments just show us our sin.
The "Law" is never referred to as "The Nine". Yet we know that that the Gentile is not obligated to keep the Sabbath as the Jew is. That creates a problem for those adhering to a strict definition of the "Law," as some also would refer to it as including all 613 commands that the Jews were obligated to keep. But the Gentiles were never under those either.Sorry I meant to say minus the sabbath rest. So you do not believe the 10 commandments is the moral law? Why? Explain.
Look it's not keeping the 10 commandments that makes one righteous its Christ. The 10 commandments just show us our sin.
Everything is funny to you Icon. You laugh at all these posts concerning the Sabbath. That is sad. You don't care about the Word of God? Is that right?You are off topic. I went through the entire sermon with you. I explained each and every verse. Paul did not quote any of these verses, so why do you. You are off topic, and these scriptures are all red herrings. Paul did not quote the entire 39 books of the OT but you seem at liberty to use them. Use the scripture that Paul used in the sermon that he preached in Acts 13.
Your answer holds no weight and has no bearing on Paul's message. He did not refer to the Law of God.
http://www.biblestudy.org/godsrest/when-does-the-bible-sabbath-begin-and-end.htmlGod's rest in the Arctic
Trying to observe God's day of rest using sunset, within the Arctic circle, is virtually impossible. This is because the sun does not set below the visible horizon for a period of time in the summer and does not come ABOVE the horizon during parts of winter. The problem of observance is also compounded by the fact that, just before the sun goes below the horizon for a period in winter, it sets at noon. Under such factors the keeping of God's Sabbath day is a real problem since it requires the abrupt stopping of all work before noon on Friday and the starting of a regular day on noon Saturday.