webdog said:
How demeaning, but a typical pompous calvinistic remark. Thanks for gracing us with your abundant knowledge.
humm. well webdog, it was I that posted the OP and as you also know I am a Calvinist. I may be the pig here.
I call them as I see them and understand it. This one verse does not change my views, but if I'm not fair and open with my thoughts, who is the fool? To change the meaning as it is read, would be the same as what I say "freewillers do, and this would make me no better then them. When I read this one verse I can not change it. The verse above it I can deal with. This one verse is makes a very hard statement that goes down a another path then what I know to be true. Again..I'm still a Calvinist, for there are to many other verse that proves this doctrine.
I guess its just not meant for us to know everything.
BTW...in the Class I'm teaching, I told them that this made it hard on the so called ..limited atonement..view. Some of them about dropped their teeth when i said this. I'm well known for my stand on the doctrine of grace. There are only a few of us 5 pointers in the church. I just feel it is better to be up front about it then to twist around. By saying this (twisting), I'm not claiming others do. We all have to teach what we KNOW to be the truth. If you feel fine with it...go for it. I did not in this case.
In Christ..James