Revmitchell said:
When you look at the history of liberals such as Briggs what we see is an unwillingness to be up front. Liberals have been willing to agree to fundamental oaths in our Seminaries all the while teaching contrary to the oaths. Such was the case wtih Briggs at Union, later others at Fuller, and such as we found during the 80's in many of the conventions seminaries.
In recent days we have those liberals who claim fundamental beliefs openly all the while working to hold on to liberal beliefs openly. The liberal of the past said Christ ministry was only about social reform. In these days they combine the two. Given that His ministry was strictly about redemption and the glory of God what we have is liberals who claim a fundamental doctrine in this area but add to it. Given the history and the clear contradiction in the two missions it is quite suspect that they actually hold to the fundamental doctrine on this and actually only hold to the liberal view that Jesus was only a social reformer. This is just one example of one doctrine.
Then we have liberals in these days who claim to "use' the word inerrant but go to the matt for those who do not. And defend them as believeing in fundamentals.
You cannot be conservative or hold to fundamental doctrines and deny inerrancy. In every case where errancy was held to the seminary fell deep into liberalsim shortly there after secularism. One follows the other every time.
This is a familiar passage in which Jesus told us how to live our lives and about achieving eternal life. It is reinforced by a very familiar parable.
Luk 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?
Luk 10:26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?
Luk 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.
Luk 10:28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.
What exactly does it mean to you to love our neighbor as ourself. To let the sick die and the starving go hungry? I'm sorry, I'm afraid you've gotten all tangled in in being a correct fundamentalist and lost sight of what it means to live a Christian life.
Luk 10:30 And Jesus answering said, A certain [man] went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded [him], and departed, leaving [him] half dead.
Luk 10:31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
Luk 10:32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked [on him], and passed by on the other side.
Luk 10:33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion [on him],
Luk 10:34 And went to [him], and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
Luk 10:35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave [them] to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.
Luk 10:36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?
Luk 10:37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.
You can call this the social gopspel or whatever you want to but you're not describing Jesus' gospel if you don't accept his commandments to do "social" things for our neighbor.
Jhn 14:21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
Luk 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.