1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What's wrong with the NKJV?

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by neal4christ, Jan 21, 2003.

  1. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    1,098
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And none of them would be proven. This is the same boilerplate that we've seen over and over and over, albeit in "lite" form.
     
  2. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The NEW KING JAMES VERSION (nKJV)
    meets this Biblical criteria:

    2 Corinthians 2:17 (nKJV):
    For we are not, as so
    many, peddling the word of
    God; but as of sincerity, but as
    from God, we speak int he sight
    of God in Christ.


    We see clearly that the KJVO peddlers
    are against the nKJV thus proving
    that the nKJV is the pure innerrant
    word of the Living God.
    [​IMG]

    [ January 28, 2003, 09:07 PM: Message edited by: Ed Edwards ]
     
  3. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    John 17:17b (nKJV):
    "Your word is truth."

    Thus the nKJV testifies of itself
    that it is the true word
    of our Blessed Lord and Savior:
    Messiah Jesus.

    This verse proves that the nKJV is
    the inerrant word of God!


    [​IMG]
     
  4. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen, Brother Ed Edwards -- Preach it!

    Further, the nKJV speaks of itself
    when it says, Jesus speaks of the
    nKJV when He says:

    Matthew 5:18 (nKJV):

    "For assuredly, I say to
    you, till heaven and earth
    pass away, oen jot or one tittle
    will by no means pass from the
    law till all is fulfilled.
    "

    This verse also proves that
    the nKJV is the inerrant word of God!

    [​IMG]

    (edited cause i can't type well tonight [​IMG] )

    [ January 28, 2003, 09:18 PM: Message edited by: Ed Edwards ]
     
  5. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    Steve K; Pure Words,
    The fact is that the KJV bible is slowly being replaced by the superior modern versions. Regardless of all your arguments, it is just a matter of time till the KJV is retired along side other versions, such as the Geneva bible.
    It must be upsetting to realize that there is nothing you can do about it. If the Lord tarries another 100 years, even your very own offspring will be using a modern version, maybe even the New New International Version.
     
  6. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    The New King James Version contains
    the words of Jesus who said
    in Matthew 24:35 (nKJV):

    Heaven and earth will
    pass away, but My words will
    by no means pass away.


    The nKJV is the true words
    of Jesus and thus contains
    the inerrant written word of God!
     
  7. Jude

    Jude <img src=/scott3.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sure you COULD go on all day. But the fact is your views are ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS. And I wonder why any of us waste time responding to these views.
    :mad:

    [ January 29, 2003, 09:28 AM: Message edited by: Jude ]
     
  8. Steve K.

    Steve K. Guest

    Terry you and the Devil both wish that the KJV would be done away with but no way.The truth is they have had to come up with 250 new versions just to find someone to read them.Those seeking the Book with God's blessing on it stay with the KJV!!
     
  9. neal4christ

    neal4christ New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,815
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like your name change, Steve. It looks like a mouthful. :D

    Neal
     
  10. Johnv

    Johnv New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2001
    Messages:
    21,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Steve, you ignore the fact that, by placing faith in the 1611 KJV as the ultimate biblical authority, you place it higher than the texts from which it was translated, which is heretical.
     
  11. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    1,098
    Faith:
    Baptist
    All in all, I cannot remember such a concentrated anti-MV blathering on so many threads at one time, even if the anti-MV "arguments" are the exact same repetition and cut-and-paste material on all the threads in question.
     
  12. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Makes me wonder why
    i bother to post here. The anti-MV
    blathering totally ignores my arguments/points.
    They must be cutting their replies
    from the how-to-do-it-book at some
    anti-MV board.

    Makes one wonder about their intellectual
    level. Note this is a generalization
    and not a specific comment about any particluar
    person. However, i still get a tad bent
    out of shape at the Bible bashers bashing
    my Holy Bible: the New King James Version
    (nKJV1982).
     
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pure Words: "He (God) knew which
    nations would send missionaries
    to the africans who were
    eating each other."

    In 1982 the number of African Christians
    equaled the number of
    North American Christians. In the past
    ten years i've seen more missionaries
    FROM Africa than TO Africa.
    Maybe the written word of God is now
    written in Zulu? [​IMG]

    Also in 1982 the nKJV was first published.
    Therefore the nKJV is the inerrent written
    word of God for the Twenty-first Century.
     
  14. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Alex Mullins: "The NKJV translators put in
    the footnoes of the Study editions
    that the source texts also included
    the corrupt Critial or Minority Text
    of Westcott and Hort ... "

    This is a correct statement except
    "corrupt" is the authors opinion.

    Regarding the Sinaitic and Vatican
    manuscripts, the Preface to
    the nKJV says: " ... some scholars have reason
    to doubt their faithfulness to the
    autographs".

    The nKJV is faithful in it's footnotes
    and Preface. By contrast, many editions
    of the KJV do not have translator foot notes
    (as did the AV) or translator preface (as
    did the AV). I've never seen any explanation
    of why the "translators" of the
    KJV1873 even bothered to change the KJV1611.
    Total dishonesty in the KJV camp;
    total honesty in the nKJV camp.
    The nKJV is not deceptive and the
    the true and inerrent writeen word
    of God preserved error free for our
    generation.
    [​IMG]
     
Loading...