Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I consider it a great song recording. I would buy a CD with songs like that on it. Note that the drum beats were only supporting and in the background and did not dominate the song, i.e. not beat-driven.
I wonder if this song is too tame for Havensdad.
I'm going to make a suggestion- what bothers you about rock music isn't the drums, but rather the guitar. The song I posted uses a rock drumming pattern. After comparing it to several hard rock songs, the drums aren't much lower in the mix on the choir song than the rock examples I compared it to. I'm a member of that choir and I was in this recording. The song has drums and electric bass, both of which can be heard very clearly. There actually is an electric guitar on this, but it's mixed fairly low. I think the reason you're okay with the song I posted is because there isn't a distorted guitar up front in the mix- not anything to do with the drums.
I wonder if this song is too tame for Havensdad.
I totally disagree. That song is not beat-driven. Yes, you can hear the drums as you should, but the drums are only supportive and are not dominate which would make the song beat-driven. Our church used to have that kind of music, and we loved it. Now the congregational music is loud, harsh and beat-driven. Our church still has an orchestra and a choir, although both are smaller along with the change in music. BTW, our drummer sits in a sound cage so the people sitting next to him can stand the drum noise.
I suspect that since you are in that choir, you don't realize what beat-driven songs have taken over in some Baptist churches.
#1 Thats not true. I know several people in their 70's, who prefer contemporary worship.
#2 The same goes in reverse. Our music is annoying to them, too. That's part of being a congregation. The worship music is (should be) a reflection of the various members, NOT excluding young people and youth.
Actually I prefer old reformed hymns, set to classic piano, or acoustic guitar with no augmentation.
My favorite song is actually "Mighty Fortress is Our God." If someone tried to put drums to it, I would probably peg them with my size 11.
I'm not trying to be argumentative; I'm just not really sure what makes a song "beat driven". Is it the volume of the drums, (Yes) or is it what the drummer is playing or some combination thereof? (probably) As an aside, we do use a sound cage for our drum set as it gives the sound people more control over the sound and better isolation.
Also, we do music that is a lot more traditional than that as well as some that is more rhythm driven than that. (To me, rhythm music does not drive the song, but supports the song. Beat-driven music drives the song; if I don't submit to the beat, it is irritating. I prefer to submit to the Lord)
What are your thoughts on using electric bass in church music? I've been learning that instrument for about six months now, and it can make something sound pretty beat driven.
I think others should be able to worship God through Praise and worship, and electric guitar solos (which sound so much better than a banjo!... )
I think you may have a point about the electric bass. In addition to our music being too loud and beat-driven, it also has a harshness sound to it that is also irritating. This morning I listened for the electric bass; and it may be what causes the harshness.
If so, why would anyone want an electric bass which causes music to have a harsh sound which irritates people?
We are 75% over 50 and we have an electric bass. Have had one for years and no one appears to be irritated. Maybe it's just you who is irritated. We think the bass and the drums add a great dynamic to the music. In fact, I'd be irritated if it were to go away.
It can sound harsh, but it doesn't have to. It's dependent on how it's played, the EQ settings, etc.
I don't think it irritates most people. Many church instrumental programs have too few bass instruments, so a lot of them go electric as a way to fill out the sound. Here's an interesting article on that: http://davidwinkler.com/static/the-bass-section-in-the-church-orchestra.html
Furthermore, most contemporary church music for choir and orchestra has a bass guitar part written. There are bass guitar parts for everything in the Baptist Hymnal.
As indicated in post #40, we have an arrangement where we can go to church and don't have to be in the service when most of the loud, harsh, beat-driven music is played. At home, we play the good songs that encourage worship for us. So we have learned to be content.
Than answer is simple: rock music has a polarizing effect. When it's introduced into a congregation, it either attracts or repels. It never unites.
If it moves your feet before it moves your heart is it worship music?
Do you start your songs off in acapella and then later add the music? What moves the heart can only be meaning, right? Either the lyrics ascribe to us what the meaning is or we ascribe to the music what the meaning is.
Seems to me that music requires an immediate physical response... either resonance or dissonance (this response applies to all physical matter affected, including the body and I would apply it to the mind as well). Some minds, or tastes if you will, are so preferrential and dogmatic that there is immediate mental dissonance.
So, if I tap my toe because the intro to the choir special is resonating with me and I am ascribing meaning to the music (the meaning being that God is great, exciting, wonderful, thrilling, etc.), what is the harm? Especially when the words are in agreement with such a musical intro. Should the choir/orchestra start out in acapella first so that I can be justified in tapping my toe when the accompanying music is played?