webdog said:Since you are implying you know...enlighten us. There is no Scripture stating "And works henceforth shalt be defined as...". It's pretty basic, and common sense.
I have on several occasions posted my view on works. I will be glad to again. Currently I want to deal with the view of those who oppose JM based on some obscure definition fo works. If it is "basic' and "comon sense" then it should be no problem to present a scriptual definition of works. No scripture says the Trinity is defined as ..... but we can give clear scriptual support. Our explanations need to be more than just "it's basic and common sense". Such statements are weakend by the lack of scriptual support.
Last edited by a moderator: