So what is the purpose of dying. You didn’t answer that.I have no idea why you think those of us who believe that by Christ's obedience, His blood shed for us, His death on a cross also think that we do not believe in a dying Savior. That is weird.
Your view is what is perceivable as weird. A pointless death? At least no explanation of it was included.
Isaiah 53 shows what you don’t want to see. But not in the same way you say it.No, sacrificing animals was not a payment for sins (Heb 10; 1 Sam 15:22; Hoz 6:6).
Matthew 12:7 is another key verse - But if you had known what this [a]means: ‘I desire compassion, rather than sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent".
What does God require? Sacrifice or obedience?
I would say your theory corrupts and minimizes not only the Old Testament sacrificial system but also the cross.
Where you see the Father as condemning the Righteous to death in order to justify the wicked, I see Christ completing a work to reconcile man to God, completely finished on the cross of Calvery.
Jesus gave Himself.
As with Abraham, the Father is there and as involved as the Son while not in the same capacity.
None of the animal sacrifices were worth anything because clearly, from the time of the patriarchs,Where you view Christ as a penal substitute I view Christ as a second type of man (a second Adam).
Genesis 22:8
And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.