Where did the virus come from? A wet market? Or a Laboratory?

[Reynolds]

Maybe they have a stop button and don't consider it too bad yet. No one knows how many Mao murdered for sure. We have a better idea how many Stalin murdered because there are some sketchy records here and there. I think that they take the census records in Russia and from the birth records they know how many were added so subtracting the newborns and using whatever death records there may be, they can calculate the shrinking population. American Stephen Kotkin is the world expert on Stalin and this is what he said in a lecture once on YouTube. Also, Solzhenitsyn had good information in the Gulag Archipelago books.

Stalin killed those he saw as opposition. He didnt just indiscriminately kill for the sake of it.

 

[church mouse guy]

Stalin killed those he saw as opposition. He didnt just indiscriminately kill for the sake of it.

Where did you get that idea? I think that Kotkin said that the total was 36,000,000.

Canadian news, Rebel News, is reporting that the virus escaped from the lab and not from the market where wild animals were sold both alive and dead.

 

[Scott Downey]

Does where it came from make a difference? It is a poor killer if engineered as a bio weapon. But pretty good weapon for economic destruction
But we are our own worst enemy, the handling so far is not having a good outcome. The healthy have no need of a physician. The elderly and i suppose immune compromised should be locked away leaving people to continue with regular life. Again 95% of deaths are people over60.

 

[Calminian]

Does where it came from make a difference? It is a poor killer if engineered as a bio weapon. But pretty good weapon for economic destruction
But we are our own worst enemy, the handling so far is not having a good outcome. The healthy have no need of a physician. The elderly and i suppose immune compromised should be locked away leaving people to continue with regular life. Again 95% of deaths are people over60.

Yes, not the best killer for sure. But highly infectious. I suppose we could speculate that it's a few steps away from being a good weapon.

This is not to say it was a weapon, though. But if it's from a lab, you have to wonder what its purpose was.

 

[Gold Dragon]

Yes, not the best killer for sure. But highly infectious. I suppose we could speculate that it's a few steps away from being a good weapon.

This is not to say it was a weapon, though. But if it's from a lab, you have to wonder what its purpose was.

The purpose of a virus in nature is self replication and infecting as many hosts as possible. This is one of the most successful human viruses we have ever encountered at this and projections are it could end up infecting almost all of the world’s population before it is done. The most “successful” natural viruses are ones that don’t kill or incapacitate their host (at least not right away) because then the host can no longer spread it. The other factor for viral success is ability to hide from immune systems or treatments which is related to mutation rates. The faster a virus mutates, the more likely it eludes immune defenses and treatments.

 

[HankD]

Wuhan Virus - ITS a eugenics tool. most victims are not aware of infection. it kills selectively depending on the strain.

antichrist infant eugenics tool - abortion. ELDERLY - VIRUS.

 

[Calminian]

Wuhan Virus - ITS a eugenics tool. most victims are not aware of infection. it kills selectively depending on the strain.

antichrist infant eugenics tool - abortion. ELDERLY - VIRUS.

The problem is, all flu then should be considered tools, since most behave the same way, targeting the elderly.

 

[HankD]

The problem is, all flu then should be considered tools, since most behave the same way, targeting the elderly.

MY MY YOU DON'T SAY.