Where does Cheney put his money?

[carpro]

Until then what? Wait until we find out the truth and that the dollar is going to get hit? By then it's too late.

It's ashame you guys can't even take a well written article and discuss it rather than just mock and joke about it. As I said before history never lies... time will tell.

Jamie

Until you have evidence of Cheney's collusion, you have nothing. Agreeing with Tom means you also agree with me. :laugh:

Being well written doesn't necessarily means it delivers all the facts.

Your response indicates there is no proof and apparently you expect everyone else to go on a rant just to please you.

It's not going to happen.

 

[JamieinNH]

Until you have evidence of Cheney's collusion, you have nothing. Agreeing with Tom means you also agree with me. :laugh:

I agree that everyone should not wait for SS to save them. If that happens to be your stance too, then yes we agree. However, where we disagree is the fact that the article from Kiplinger paints a clear picture, where or not you want to listen to it or not.

CounterPouch may be left wing, but their article is base off of the Kiplinger's article, so until you can dispute Kiplinger, you have nothing but your rants.

Being well written doesn't necessarily means it delivers all the facts.

What facts did the Kiplinger fail to deliver? Do you have any proof? Kiplinger's article is based off Chenney's public records. What do you have?

Your response indicates there is no proof and apparently you expect everyone else to go on a rant just to please you.

It's not going to happen.

My response is to the Kiplinger's article of which you haven't even addressed. You're the one ranting and wanting everyone to believe you.

I am not looking to please anyone, but only a person with blinders on would read the Kiplinger article and not see where we are headed.

Again, you don't want to talk about the article, just rant and rave and point fingers and derail a thread with "kid style" postings.

Jamie

 

[777]

It's always interesting when socialists talk about finance. It's even more interesting when there's an action - i.e., Soros buying two million shares in Halliburton.

You are correct in that there is nothing we can do about it. But that shouldn't stop people from knowing the truth. Hard working people that invest their moneies in our country, and yet he is banking on failure.

That, my friend is no joking matter and we will see that it's not in the coming years.

Jamie
History always tells the truth...

Hyperbole. From the ten-month-old Kiplinger article that only kewl people read:

Vice President Cheney's financial advisers are apparently betting on a rise in inflation and interest rates and on a decline in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies

Betting on a rise in inflation and a weak dollar isn't "banking on failure", it's investing. Collusion here is impossible, macroeconomics does not bend to Dick Cheney's will.

 

[carpro]

My response is to the Kiplinger's article of which you haven't even addressed. You're the one ranting and wanting everyone to believe you.

I am not looking to please anyone, but only a person with blinders on would read the Kiplinger article and not see where we are headed.

Again, you don't want to talk about the article, just rant and rave and point fingers and derail a thread with "kid style" postings.

Jamie

Your posted article from Kiplinger is not the subject of this thread.

Start another thread if you'd like to talk about the Kiplinger article and let James Newman discuss the one he posted.

 

[JamieinNH]

Your posted article from Kiplinger is not the subject of this thread.

Start another thread if you'd like to talk about the Kiplinger article and let James Newman discuss the one he posted.

Nice Dodge...

Tom asked for the link, which the article in this thread had referred to, and so it became part of the thread.

If you can't debate the links and Kiplinger report, then at least stop playing games.

Now, what did the Kiplinger report fail to reveal? Since you seem to think something is hidden or just not quite right with it, please shed some light on it...

Jamie

 

[777]

Dodging WHAT? The Kiplinger article was just analysis of Cheney's financial disclosure statements from last year. It's no smoking gun.

 

[JamieinNH]

Dodging WHAT? The Kiplinger article was just analysis of Cheney's financial disclosure statements from last year. It's no smoking gun.

Carpro knows what he is doing, and what he is dodging. You have just come into this thread, so go back and read the post between us, and you will have a better understanding what we are talking about.

Clue one: It's not about the article in the first place.

You guys are hard set in your ways, and nothing will change, after 6 years you all still have blinders on.. Oh well...

I am done with these games on this thread....

Jamie
Smoke and mirrors.. what will get you through the next 2 years... you hope.

 

[StraightAndNarrow]

Not hardly.

Where does Cheney put his money?



He'd probably like to know as well. In about 2 years, he'll find out.

So you're claiming that all of his money is in a blind trust? Any evidence of that?

 

[hillclimber1]

Anything that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions is always labeled ''Liberal." I guess this is easier than actually commenting on the facts.

For you and Carpro, this administration can do no wrong.

He's exactly right. There is not a thing wrong with Cheney's investments. The article is simply a smear by the leftists, and integrity is nowhere near them. And you yet again align yourself with the maligners.

 

[Petra-O IX]

He's exactly right. There is not a thing wrong with Cheney's investments. .

Here is what may be wrong with the way Dick Cheney makes his investments.
Cheney is a Global player and has a better insight than the regular Joe has.Cheney's recent investments are dependant on the on the U.S. economy going down considerably, if he knows this then why isn't he taking steps to protect American investments in American stocks and funds but the Global player isn't concerned about the average Joe he only concerned about his own welfare. Cheney is a Globalist first and being American is at the low end of his priorities.

 

[EdSutton]

In a short answer to the thread title, I'd say Vice-President Cheney puts/keeps his money in four places, just like all the rest of us. In a bank, in his pocket, in his investments (like most major figures in the political world, in a so-called "Blind Trust"), and I'd have no idea of how many 'grand' he keeps under his mattress!

Ed

 

[EdSutton]

I would guess that now he puts it is (sic) Dubai.

:laugh: :laugh:

Ed

 

[Terry_Herrington]

He's exactly right. There is not a thing wrong with Cheney's investments. The article is simply a smear by the leftists, and integrity is nowhere near them. And you yet again align yourself with the maligners.

I proudly align myself with "the maligners" as you call them. I think it is better than being aligned with people like Cheney and Bush.

Don't worry though, I don't expect you to understand, you are blinded by hatred for anything you deem "liberal" and that makes you a hopeless case, unfortunately.

 

[hillclimber1]

I proudly align myself with "the maligners" as you call them. I think it is better than being aligned with people like Cheney and Bush.

Don't worry though, I don't expect you to understand, you are blinded by hatred for anything you deem "liberal" and that makes you a hopeless case, unfortunately.

I called no one maligners that I can remember.
I admire and respect the office of POTUS, and realize that the men that serve there are fallible. I have an enormous amount of respect for President Bush and Vice President Cheney, when comparing them with any Democrat President this side of Kennedy.

This administration has faced terrific challenges and has conducted itself in an admirable way. The Democrats in power must be very thankful they haven't had the presidency these last 6 years, cause they'd be lost. All they've done is to become the biggest enemy this administration has yet faced.

I'm a "hopeless case" because I appose the liberal religion? I revel in that. The liberal religion stands up for and promotes many many evil ideas and programs. We fight against spiritual wickedness in high places and the liberal religion is part of it. And I know you can know little of it.

 

[Petra-O IX]

There is not a thing wrong with Cheney's investments. The article is simply a smear by the leftists, and integrity is nowhere near them. .

It is not only the lefties who have a problem with integrity. Cheney is free to invest his money however he wants but he is betting on the U.S. economy to tank. Isn't it his job to watch out for the interest of American people. All this reflects is that he has zero confidence in the American financial markets and zero respect for the American people, it is an "every man for himself " attitude.

 

[TomVols]

I don't think you can reasonably draw that conclusion just because Cheyney's fiduciaries have a balanced portfolio. I guarantee that if people have blended funds in their portfolios, the same charges could be levied at them. Indeed, you could almost make the argument against anyone who has moneys in certain bond vehicles. What if you're growth oriented and have money in International equities? Are you anti-American then? It's a specious and ill-informed argument.

What cripples a discussion like this is so few people know anything about financial planning. As I said before, everyone needs to get sound financial planning advice from a reputable source so that everyone can adequately be good stewards of their finances.

 

[Petra-O IX]

I don't think you can reasonably draw that conclusion just because Cheyney's fiduciaries have a balanced portfolio. I guarantee that if people have blended funds in their portfolios, the same charges could be levied at them. Indeed, you could almost make the argument against anyone who has moneys in certain bond vehicles. What if you're growth oriented and have money in International equities? Are you anti-American then? It's a specious and ill-informed argument.

What cripples a discussion like this is so few people know anything about financial planning. As I said before, everyone needs to get sound financial planning advice from a reputable source so that everyone can adequately be good stewards of their finances.

Wey well put Tom. I find little to disagree with you on this point. From the article it appeared that Cheney was heavily investing into markets that would beniefit him if the economy goes down the tubes and my concern (was and is) that because Cheney is in a position to affect how the American economy performs is he just using this as a means to cash in on his own personal wealth at the expense of running down our country.