Sorry, Craig- not this time! No half-quotes; no out-of-context cites; no running; no hiding behind some unidentified 'scholar' or 'scholars'; no redefinining anything "on the fly" to fit your own presuppositions; no bait and switch. Play games, if you choose. Even if I happen to be one of those who you would like to consider as one who does something
"based upon the grossest imaginable ignorance"
implying, of course, that YOU have arrived at YOUR contusions
"based upon many years of highly academic scholarship with a very detailed and comprehensive knowledge of the original languages, the original culture, and 2,000 years of biblical scholarship",
or at least borrowed the same, a la Joe Biden, from someone who has already done this, (without telling us how you know this to be accurate and correct, of course), I ain't joining in this game!
FTR, my post of Feb.17, 2006 - 5:19 PM , a third of the way down page four of this thread stands, as written, despite your opinion of it.
Craig quoted and wrote:
"Origin of the Concept: The term `fundamentalism' has its origin in a series of pamphlets published between 1910 and 1915. Entitled "The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth," these booklets... ".
Again YOU, not me, provided the link from which I quoted.
My post from Feb. 18, 2006 - 12:11 AM, halfway down the page, likewise stands, despite your comments. I plan on rebuttal to your remarks about the publications, but that will have to wait until tomorrow, as I'm falling asleep.
Until then, you finally quoted me and wrote:
Language Cop checked for spelling and could find no errors!
Ed
"based upon the grossest imaginable ignorance"
implying, of course, that YOU have arrived at YOUR contusions
"based upon many years of highly academic scholarship with a very detailed and comprehensive knowledge of the original languages, the original culture, and 2,000 years of biblical scholarship",
or at least borrowed the same, a la Joe Biden, from someone who has already done this, (without telling us how you know this to be accurate and correct, of course), I ain't joining in this game!
FTR, my post of Feb.17, 2006 - 5:19 PM , a third of the way down page four of this thread stands, as written, despite your opinion of it.
Craig quoted and wrote:
I responded by quoting 'Steve', [whom I suspect you know something of, but I AM guessing here. I also suspect you may know a certain cow-breeder from PA (who also knows Steve), who happens to be my closest friend. We'll see.] I noticed you did not acknowledge Steve's remarks about the-
"Origin of the Concept: The term `fundamentalism' has its origin in a series of pamphlets published between 1910 and 1915. Entitled "The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth," these booklets... ".
Again YOU, not me, provided the link from which I quoted.
My post from Feb. 18, 2006 - 12:11 AM, halfway down the page, likewise stands, despite your comments. I plan on rebuttal to your remarks about the publications, but that will have to wait until tomorrow, as I'm falling asleep.
Until then, you finally quoted me and wrote:
I was not referring to syntax!
Language Cop checked for spelling and could find no errors!
Ed
