1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Which KJV is Preserved?

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by Pastor_Bob, Nov 4, 2002.

Top Posters
Page 3 of 3
  1. Siegfried

    Siegfried Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    0
    Still waiting for an answer to this question, KJVO's. </font>[/QUOTE]Still waiting . . .
     
    #41 Siegfried, Nov 6, 2002
  2. BeeBee

    BeeBee New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2002
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pastor Bob,
    I would like to know if you have ever read the preface to the KJV 16ll?

    Thanks,
    In Christ,
    Bobby
     
    #42 BeeBee, Nov 16, 2002
  3. rsr

    rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    11,864
    Likes Received:
    1,098
    Faith:
    Baptist
    #43 rsr, Nov 16, 2002
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,401
    Likes Received:
    553
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since I have newly returned to the Translation Forum (after a year's sabbatical) I am enjoying the debates. Appreciate the good information and clear statements of belief.

    As far as I can summarize it some believe:</font>
    • AV1611 was the culmination of all English translations</font>
    • KJV1769 revision was the culmination of all English translations</font>
    • NKJV1982 was the culmination of all English translations
      or</font>
    • Many different English translations prior to AV1611 were all legitimate and God's Word</font>
    • Many different English translations after AV1611 were all legitimate and God's Word</font>
    Think I've got it. And still waiting for evidence for 4 of the 5! :rolleyes:
     
    #44 Dr. Bob, Nov 17, 2002
  5. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is axiomatic:
    All English versions of the Holy Bible
    are legitimate and God's Written Word
    and are infallible, being Divinely
    Preserved for us this hour.

    Being axiomatic, it requires no
    evidence or other form of proof.

    Romans 10:17 (nKJV):

    So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
     
    #45 Ed Edwards, Nov 22, 2002
  6. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,401
    Likes Received:
    553
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Don't know ANYONE who would agree with this and hold that position as "axiomatic".

    Except some Jehovah's Witnesses who would be THRILLED to have their intentionally-perverted English translation considered as "inspired".
     
    #46 Dr. Bob, Nov 23, 2002
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 3
Loading...