Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't know what you think. However I know what you have posted. I assume that what you posted somewhat resembles your opinions, but I could be wrong. Perhaps you just post random things.How do you know what I think?
Actually, I don't think you should run out and buy it. I don't really care for study Bibles. By having someone's opinions on the page next to the scriptural text, I think that for many people it undermines the necessary time of struggling with the scripture to understand it and fosters dependency upon human teachers instead of the Spirit. There's nothing wrong with human teachers, but you should first sit at the feet of the Spirit when reading the scriptures and let the Spirit guide you. Then, if you don't understand, seek the assistance of human teachers - through books and other resources - as well as living, interactive ones.And why don't you educate us on the wonders of this work and why we should make room for it on our shelves?
I don't know what you think. However I know what you have posted. I assume that what you posted somewhat resembles your opinions, but I could be wrong. Perhaps you just post random things.
I don't know what you think. However I know what you have posted. I assume that what you posted somewhat resembles your opinions, but I could be wrong. Perhaps you just post random things.
You felt the need to post that Campolo recommends the study Bible which seems to indicate that it is a significant fact for us to consider.
Then you informed us that the "...reference to Campolo is not a positive thumbs up..." to clarify that your previous post was a negative endorsement.
I am reading your words and taking them seriously. Is that a mistake? Should I not take your words seriously?
Actually, I don't think you should run out and buy it. I don't really care for study Bibles. By having someone's opinions on the page next to the scriptural text, I think that for many people it undermines the necessary time of struggling with the scripture to understand it and fosters dependency upon human teachers instead of the Spirit. There's nothing wrong with human teachers, but you should first sit at the feet of the Spirit when reading the scriptures and let the Spirit guide you. Then, if you don't understand, seek the assistance of human teachers - through books and other resources - as well as living, interactive ones.
For seven years I used a Ryrie Study Bible and for the first six of them believed everything that Ryrie had written. That last year, I started realizing that the notes he had did not teach the same thing as the scripture - specifically Jesus. I was looking to see what the gospel message that Jesus taught was all about since I didn't recall ever hearing Jesus use something live the "four spiritual laws" or the "Roman road" in His interaction with others. After great struggle, I realized that Ryrie had made some great errors with his theology of salvation. A couple of years later, John MacArthur brought out the same conclusion in his book, "The Gospel According to Jesus." However, MacArthur didn't go far enough because of his Dispensationalist theology (doesn't allow for him to see that the Kingdom of God is a present day thing - which is what Jesus clearly teaches).
The "Life With God Study Bible" has a proper understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom, along with helps on how to enter the Kingdom in very practical ways. If someone is going to get a study Bible, they might as well get one that lines up with the teaching of Jesus.
That being said, there may be others out there that also have a proper view of the Kingdom of God (or "the Heavens" as in Matthew), but I'm guessing they are few and far between.
For seven years I used a Ryrie Study Bible and for the first six of them believed everything that Ryrie had written. That last year, I started realizing that the notes he had did not teach the same thing as the scripture - specifically Jesus. I was looking to see what the gospel message that Jesus taught was all about since I didn't recall ever hearing Jesus use something live the "four spiritual laws" or the "Roman road" in His interaction with others.
After great struggle, I realized that Ryrie had made some great errors with his theology of salvation. A couple of years later, John MacArthur brought out the same conclusion in his book, "The Gospel According to Jesus." However, MacArthur didn't go far enough because of his Dispensationalist theology (doesn't allow for him to see that the Kingdom of God is a present day thing - which is what Jesus clearly teaches).
Yes. I'm far from the only person who believes this. John MacArthur wrote "The Gospel According to Jesus" in response to Zane Hodges and Charles Ryrie back in the late 1980s, and they each followed up with books of their own explaining their positions in greater detail.Ryrie has his theology of salvation wrong? Really?
I made no such claim. You are making wild assumptions.So tell us how you brilliantly deduced that the gospel taught by Jesus is different than that taught by Paul, who, btw, received the gospel directly from our risen Lord.
My internet connection is down and I don't have the time or patience to give the appropriate response from my mobile device. I will respond to this later today.Let me hear you explain the gospel of Jesus.
Essentially Ryrie believed that one did not need to repent to be saved...
Wow... This is not an obscure discussion. There was a massive dust-up about this in conservative Christian circles in the late 1980s. You can easily Google up vast amounts of information about it.Kindly provide a referenced quote
Crossway
______
Furthermore, Ryrie wrote a book called "So Great a Salvation" that addressed this very point in detail. I own a copy of the book somewhere and I read it very carefully when it came out.
You shouldn't just rely on out of context quotes. You should investigate things for yourself and use the brain God gave you.Well when you stumble on the book, put up a reference. I can wait.
You shouldn't just rely on out of context quotes. You should investigate things for yourself and use the brain God gave you.
We're done. You just want to argue.Are you talking to yourself again?
As i have written previously, I have made no such claim.So tell us how you brilliantly deduced that the gospel taught by Jesus is different than that taught by Paul, who, btw, received the gospel directly from our risen Lord.
Let me hear you explain the gospel of Jesus.