Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How about this one:
Phone rings, - call ID says it is the boss - Dad tells daughter to answer and say he is not at home
- Okay - that definitely would be a lie
But supposed she were to say -
"I'm sorry, he is not currently available, may I take a message and have him call you back."
My father-in-law had a mental disorder. He actually thought he was in England. I talked to him as if we were both in England,,,,I played the game. I lied, and I don't feel one bit guilty in that circumstance.
Cheers,
Jim
Read the whole item...Quote: I lied, and I don't feel one bit guilty in that circumstance......need I repeat for you....in that circumstance....circumstance
Cheers,
Jim:tonofbricks:
Sorry,,forgot you are perfect!
Cheers,
Jim
My father-in-law had a mental disorder. He actually thought he was in England. I talked to him as if we were both in England,,,,I played the game. I lied, and I don't feel one bit guilty in that circumstance.
Cheers,
Jim
Yes absolutely. Perhaps you have the wrong Jesus if you think He would flatter the child or be brutal to him as flattery is sin.
It is still a lie. Set the proper example for you child and answer the phone yourself, but don't ever push off on your child your responsibilities. This is why we do not have but very few real godly men today in the churches. Men need to be responsible! And by all means whatever the conversation be honest with your boss also.
It is possible, in this scenario, for the child to answer and not lie. The child does not need to give an excuse, nor should the parent ask them to give an excuse. A simple, "I'm sorry, may I take a message so that my father may return your call" is all that is necessary. Why WE think it is necessary to make excuses for other people is beyond me.
I think there's a lot of folks that need to read the book Respectable Sins by Jerry Bridges (self-edited the rest of what I was going to say here). There's a difference between telling a lie and rudely and crassly telling the truth. There's a difference between being encouraging in critique and discouraging in the same critique. For instance, my art teacher (in 6th grade) gave me a C. He told my mother, at parent-teacher conference, that my artwork was F work but he gave me a C because I believed honestly what I had done was great and that in art beauty was in the eye of the beholder. In HIS artistic opinion my artwork was lousy (now I realize he was right....I can't draw a straight line with a ruler) but he wanted to be encouraging. So did he lie? I don't think so...I DID think my work was great and turned each piece in with excitement and a smile.
Sometimes a little bit of tact in the words we use can go a long way....including on this board.
I think a lot of people today who claim to be Christians think they have figured out ways to circumvent godliness, but at their own great expense.
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
You're going to be pretty lonely up there in heaven all by yourself FAL.
No it will be filled with those who love and follow the Lord, and no false professors.
You just don't get it, do you FAL? I am actually in complete agreement with you about telling white lies, or any sin for that matter. The scriptures say for those who name the Lord to depart from iniquity.
But there are right ways and wrong ways to do things. Implying that everyone who does not agree with you is unsaved is the wrong way. That is not for you, or I, or anyone but God to judge.
Who did Jesus rebuke the most severely in scriptures? Was it the harlots and publicans? No, it was the self-righteous scribes and Pharisees he rebuked.
Jesus was kind and merciful toward sinners, and they were drawn to him. He was harsh to those who were self-righteous and believed themselves better than others.
You may not like to hear this, but you come across as extremely self-righteous, and that is a sin my friend.
Luke 18:9 And he spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others:
Who does that sound like?
Luke 15:1 Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him.
2 And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.
Who came to Jesus to listen to him? Who murmured against Jesus?
Just a little friendly advice, take it or leave it.
My father-in-law had a mental disorder. He actually thought he was in England. I talked to him as if we were both in England,,,,I played the game. I lied, and I don't feel one bit guilty in that circumstance.
Cheers,
Jim
I think a lot of people today who claim to be Christians think they have figured out ways to circumvent godliness, but at their own great expense.